Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Apology: I was wrong about Obama

Well, it takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. The time has come for me to confess that everything the Kossacks predicted has come true: Obama has indeed proven himself to be a wise and courageous president. He is an exemplar of the progressive spirit. What a difference from the administration of George W. Bush!

Obama's economic team formulated their plans according to the presumption that we would be experiencing 7.9% unemployment at this time. And that's just what happened! We all owe a debt of thanks to Barack Obama for the sharp reduction in personal bankruptcies.

I can only applaud Obama's foresight in his decision to place the "too big to fail" banks into receivership. Obama had the courage to stand up to the Wall Street crowd. If Hillary had gotten into office, she probably would have handed our financial future over to guys like Larry Summers and Tim Geithner.

Perhaps Obama's most important accomplishment was pushing Congress to write new regulations for the financial industry. These rules which will insure that nothing resembling the recent economic disaster will never occur again. Without those regulations in place, Wall Street would surely fall back into its old ways. Wisely, Obama understood that he had only a brief period in which to act -- had he waited, regulatory reform would soon have become politically impossible.

Obama understands that we live in a "trickle up" economy. He knows, as FDR knew, that if the average worker has extra cash in his wallet, he will use that money to purchase goods and services, thereby promoting economic activity. (By contrast, overpaid bank executives simply stash their loot overseas.) That's why Obama's team has concentrated on jobs, jobs, jobs -- putting millions of ordinary Americans back to work.

Those three words have become Obama's mantra: Jobs, jobs, jobs! Now, whenever he says those words during a speech (as he often does), the crowd chants with him: Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!

Obama's institution of a HOLC-style protection plan for homeowners facing foreclosure has shielded thousands (perhaps millions) of Americans from disaster. You know damned well that Hillary would never have done such a thing.

Speaking as a Californian, I must express my thanks to Barack Obama for all the help he has given my troubled state. We will remember. California, with its massive number of electoral votes, is sure to vote Democratic in the next election.

I'm also extremely grateful to Obama for his courageous stance on health care. Instead of bowing to the insurance industry, Barack Obama has fulfilled the promise he once made:
I happen to be a proponent of a single payer universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its Gross National Product on health care cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody... A single payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. And that’s what I’d like to see. But as all of you know, we may not get there immediately. Because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House.
Mission accomplished!

Everyone knows that Barack Obama was a fervent opponent of the Iraq war. He strongly condemned the invasion during his 2004 address to the DNC. His calls for troop withdrawal became the cornerstone of his campaign for the Senate. He was never the sort of cowardly politician who spoke out against the war only when it was politically easy to do so. So it came as no surprise when he fulfilled his pledge to make withdrawal his first priority. Our brave young men and women in uniform are finally coming home!

All lovers of the Constitution should thank Obama for overturning the outrageous Bush-era assault on our right to privacy. No longer will the government be able to eavesdrop on our private conversations without a warrant.

This administration, unlike its predecessor, will not attempt to hide abusive behavior under the "state secrets" rubric. In three important court cases, the administration has declared that it will not use the scurrilous "state secrets privilege" to impede justice.

Not only did the Obama administration immediately call for an end to the illegal detentions at Guantanamo, our president has pledged never to reverse that decision under any circumstances. From now on, all prisoners will receive a fair trial in which they will be able to face their accusers and to see the evidence against them.

America will no longer torture. America will no longer covertly ship prisoners to corrupt regimes in order to have others perform torture at our behest.

The American psyche underwent a difficult period of soul-searching when the Administation fought for the release of photographs and videos documenting the rape of a boy at Abu Ghraib, under the supervision of American military authorities. We also saw photographic evidence documenting even worse abuses at that facility and elsewhere. Thousands of horrifying images were released. We were forced to ask ourselves: "How could Americans allow such things to happen? How could we participate in such actions? Are we no better than the Nazis?" Asking such questions may have been difficult, but I feel certain that the national conversation will, in the end, have a cleansing and healing effect. It will also insure that such atrocities will never again occur under an American flag. We will be a better nation after having had this debate -- a debate which would not have occurred if Obama had kept the evidence under lock and key.

As you will recall, candidate Barack Obama told Planned Parenthood that signing an abortion rights law would be one of his highest priorities. Sure enough, he acted with boldness on that front during his first hundred days.

I am so grateful that Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame will finally have their day in court.

Obama promised to reform "Don't ask, don't tell" -- and now he's doing just that. Of course, we all recall the courage he displayed when he came to California and campaigned against Prop 8.

Finally, we must always be grateful to Barack Obama for seeking justice against the miscreants who flouted the law during the Bush administration. I, for one, eagerly look forward to heaing Dick Cheney defend himself before the World Court. Now that Cheney is facing a prison sentence, he sure us spilling a lot of beans, isn't he? We would never have learned the truth about the Bush administration's conspiratorial activities if Obama had decided to pursue "reconcilation" instead of retribution.

On all these issues, and on so many more, Obama has proven that I was a fool to oppose his nomination. I owe my readers a massive apology. Hillary Clinton would have been far worse.

It's a bright new day!

26 comments:

dakinikat said...

Wow, that is what a really liberal/democratic/progressive presidency would look like now, wouldn't it? What does that mean we got? (Besides shafted)

zaphod said...

Obama invokes Jesus more than Bush

He’s done it while talking about abortion and the Middle East, even the economy. The references serve at once as an affirmation of his faith and a rebuke against a rumor that persists for some to this day.

As president, Barack Obama has mentioned Jesus Christ in a number of high-profile public speeches — something his predecessor George W. Bush rarely did in such settings, even though Bush’s Christian faith was at the core of his political identity.

In his speech Thursday in Cairo, Obama told the crowd that he is a Christian and mentioned the Islamic story of Isra, in which Moses, Jesus and Mohammed joined in prayer.

At the University of Notre Dame on May 17, Obama talked about the good works he’d seen done by Christian community groups in Chicago. “I found myself drawn — not just to work with the church but to be in the church,” Obama said. “It was through this service that I was brought to Christ.”

source politico

Peter of Lone Tree said...

(Uh, any of you folks that are close to Joe wanna maybe call the Crisis Hot Line? Around here it's 911, but I dunno what the number is in his area.)

NYSmike said...

Well done Joseph! Well done!

Anonymous said...

I thought for a minute you had been kidnapped by the Kool-aid cultists, then I noticed you were using snark font.

Anonymous said...

Jeezus! I nearly had a jammer when I read this post's title.


juststoppingby

John Smart said...

My, My when you are good, you are very, very good.

Great post.

Nadai said...

Meanwhile, back in this universe...

::sigh:: I really wanted to be wrong about Obama.

MrMike said...

I thought my calender was broke and today was 4/1/09.
It isn't so it must be true.
Obama is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

Snowflake said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgWPbotqJt8

Obama also made America safe for gays.

I find amazing that these people suddenly have discovered that Obama is a liar when it was obvious from day one. The complete hypocrisy of these people is so unbelievable my mind almost gives in under the strain of absorbing it.

Anonymous said...

That graphic at the top is really creeping me out.

kenoshamarge said...

Not funny Joseph, you scared me half to death!

I thought another freedom fighter had been held down, forced to drink the kool-aid and was now just another afflicted, addicted Bot.

Thank goodness you are still fighting the good fight and pointing out the lies, inconsistencies and just plain bull$hit of the Obama Administration and his faithful cult.

Anonymous said...

For 3 seconds I thought you had had a lobotomy. You could add that the prez has put honesty and decency back into business by having the government take over the automotive manufacturing industry and reordering 500 years of US and common contract law, which will also basically end the useless bond industry in the US, and allow the taxpayers to finance all business and fed. state and local government projects and expansion. It will also keep those greedy, stupid pensioners and endowment financed college students where they belong--broke.

Seriously, the Chrysler precedent regarding secured bonds has the potential to be one of the most dangerous unintended consequence of this whole messiah tent show. Demonizing bond holders, and then stiffing them is so short sighted and stupid that I am stunned. Regardless of the other crap they have lied about (with exception of torture), this may have the largest impact on all of us. It is really that bad and Congress will have to correct it if they have the guts.

Anonymous said...

We're united now. Hopeful. Standing for change... with a cup on a street corner. I'm so old I remember when the Democratic party's agenda belonged to all of us. Now it's just about Him.

Anonymous said...

Sorry ulv46, it's been my experience AS a fundamentalist pentecost that the more one uses Christ for their own ends (i.e., in speeches) the less devoted of a follower of Jesus they are. I would like to know the exact date this conversion to Christ/baptism occurred. Mine happened when I was 8 years old, and I'll never forget it. I think it is absolutely sick that Obama uses this imagery when he also knows that so many consider him the Black messiah. What he really is doing through the references to Christ is continuing that connection that he is messiah like so that idiots like Newsweek's Evan Thomas call him a sort of God. Nobody who is humble in the ways of Christ would allow those references to persist without putting them to rest & Obama even refuses to acknowledge them.

Joseph, you made me laugh and cry. What a wonderful world real Liberalism could be! But the forces behind Bush/Obama will not let that be the case.

FembotsForObama

b said...

I thought you weren't into irony! :-) Still, I thought you were into consistency, until you backed the Repuglican candidate for the US presidency.

To focus on a serious bit inside the ironic wrapper:

"He knows, as FDR knew, that if the average worker has extra cash in his wallet, he will use that money to purchase goods and services, thereby promoting economic activity."

There's a big difference with the 1930s. In that decade, simultaneously with the Depression, there was an industry-based technological revolution going on.

By industry, I mean actual manufacturing of stuff, taking lots of labour-time and resources, using new technology and permitting the growth of both productivity and intensity of labour (those last two trends usually being confusingly rolled into one, even by the cruder 'Marxists'). In the 1930s, that meant the development of mass production and the beginnings of mass consumption.

An industrial revolution also started up during the previous Depression (previously known as 'Great') in the 1870s and 1880s.

This time, there's Depression but no industrial revolution. Today's technological change is based on information and communications technology, in the sense that includes genetic tech. None of it requires loads of labour hours to produce. The world economy is set to shrink for decades.

In the productive powerhouse of the world - China - there will be no Keynesianism... Sure, the middle class is "big" in certain terms. 100 or 200 million people who might buy cars or flash sofas or flat-screen TVs or whatever... But there won't be mass consumption as took off in the US, the UK and several other countries in the 1950s.

Keynesianism - or to give it a better name, Fordism - was a productivity deal (or productivity-plus-labour-intensity).

That won't happen again.

There won't even be the sort of 'recovery' there was after 1973. How many people in America are going to buy computers who don't already have them?

Compare the green twaddle of today with the energy savings drive of that time. Similar in many respects, but with a much darker backstory of the poor being dirty and unnecessary.

Famine within 10-15 years max, I reckon.

As the chances of proletarian revolution fade away, its necessity becomes ever more burning. Which is a true irony - the social question burning most intensely when its chances of being answered are falling to zilch...

Anonymous said...

Seriously, the Chrysler precedent regarding secured bonds has the potential to be one of the most dangerous unintended consequence of this whole messiah tent show.

Not to mention the precedent of Obama and Rattner illegally (since the Nixon-era ERISA law) raiding the GM workers' pension fund to pay back its loans from Citi et al; that sets the precedent for any company in bankruptcy to do the same.


Sergei Rostov

Anonymous said...

What lies behind this change? Alien probes? MKUltra?

What ever it is you are now one of us one of us one of us

Sophie said...

Excellent post, Joseph.

Snarkfont indeed!!

Zee said...

Fun post!

ulv46 and Fembot:

“I found myself drawn — not just to work with the church but to be in the church,” Obama said. “It was through this service that I was brought to Christ.”
==========

I'm surprised Fraudbama even brought this up. Because the unasked question is....if Rev. Wright "brought him to Jesus" (yeah, right) as an adult....what was he before?

Someone's gonna ask him that if he brings this up too much. Personally, I think he was atheist, like his mom, but he was also raised as a Muslim by his stepdad.

Perry Logan said...

Great blog, Joe.

I was seriously wrong about how Obama would conduct his Presidential campaign. After the low-down sleaze of the primaries, I thought he would conduct the dirtiest Democratic Presidential campaign ever.

But as far as I know, his Presidential campaign was almost as clean as his primary campaign was dirty. This puzzled me so much that I thought I might be completely wrong about Obama. Maybe he was a Democrat after all...

Then Obama proceeded to screw up big-time, and the relatively clean Presidential campaign once again threw me into confusion.

Then I figured it out. The answer lies in the Obama people's abiding hatred of Democrats.

The Obama people hate Democrats more than anyone in the world. After all, only someone who hates Democrats more than anyone in the world would call his/her fellow Democrats racists.

This explains the dirty-primary-clean-election paradox. It's painfully simple: The Obama Dems will do anything to hurt their fellow Democrats--especially a woman. But they would never harm a hair on a Republican's head.

Snowflake said...

I guess we can add that Obama passed legislation creating a single payer health care system to this imaginary list.

I see some dems are trying to avoid this life saving legislation and are pushing a new kind of health care proposal-a sort of coop, which I imagine will sort of provide cancer treatment and sort of save lives-sort of.

The argument that repubs and sympathetic dems use to advance this effort to save the private health care industry (as opposed to the American public) is ....that the private health care industry can not compete with government!!!!!


This is the opposite of the argument that the same people have used for decades that government is inefficient and can not compete with private industry.

The basis for the vast waves of privatization of former government roles in the military, prisons and other areas over the past 30 years was based on the republican "government is inefficient" argument. The repubs still want to replace social security with private investment accounts based on this idea.

In fact since Reagan the repubs have attacked every aspect of government as inefficient, only private industry has any merit.

Now they argue that private industry that cant make it.

And no one points out this about face-my head is really just going to explode.

Anonymous said...

Aristotle said one cannot say whether another has had a happy life until it's over. Zhou Enlai, when asked by Nixon what he thought of the French Revolution, replied it was too soon to tell.

I am reminded of when the NY Times declared the Clinton presidency had a stench of failure (and that was in the transition period prior to his taking the oath of office). Possibly some readers here do not have an adult recall of the early Clinton years. It wasn't pretty.

As of mid-'93 (about where we are now), his job approval was down to 36%. Deservedly so, or at least understandably so, in the wake of incompetence, false starts, immediate turnarounds on key campaign pledges (the middle class tax cut, abruptly and immediately deemed unaffordable, no high-tech stimulus spending, no gays in the military, no success on national health care, two failed Attorney-General nominees in a debacle of non-vetting, etc.).

There was a mass defection of Democratic office holders to the GOP, and many liberal voices said that not only was the Clinton presidency self-immolating, but destroying the party itself in the process. The House became majority GOP for the first time in 40 years or more.

The classic Clinton triangulation policy used traditional liberal Democrats as a foil, deliberately distancing himself from policy positions held by the left wing of the party, instead pushing 'centrist' policies such as NAFTA and GATT, vastly expanding the federal death penalty by some 60 crimes, signing onto welfare reform. He and Reno decided to give the GHW Bush administration a pass on their IraqGate crimes almost immediately, and I do not recall his going back to prosecute the thousands of S&L criminals either.

Despite these most unimpressive opening omens, Clinton's presidency still garners high marks OVERALL, NOW, given their EVENTUAL good results (few of which were in evidence during his first term, let alone his first year).

Politics is far more a moiety than most people realize, more akin to the give and take of the obscure Asian board game 'GO' than any linear game familiar in the West.

Perhaps Obama may end up the turncoat to the left he now appears to be (on early returns), but perhaps not. And perhaps his eventual success, like Clinton's, will actually depend on disappointing some on the left's most fervently held wet dreams for what was surely an empty vessel for whatever voters may have had in mind.

I will note one thing he promised, which he just fulfilled, and which, all by itself, may be about the most courageous and important act out of the Oval Office ever in our collective lifetimes.

He has gone to a major Arab nation capital and delivered the address he promised, and he has insisted that Israel actually perform what it has agreed to multiple times in multiple negotiations, and which UNSC Resolution 242 laid out so long ago as the precondition for an international settlement of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict: namely, the dismantling of the settlements which violate the Geneva Conventions.

XI

DancingOpossum said...

Only a fervent, Kool-Aid-besotted Obot could dare to find similarities between Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. "Delusional" doesn't even come close. For one thing, Clinton governed exactly as he campaigned--and did so in the face of crazed, unhinged, Republican intransigence (by a party still very powerful then), media hatred, and Dem insecurity. Obama has NONE of these factors to contend with, and in fact, his much vaunted "popularity" should give him an easy way to push through the "liberal" policies everyone who voted for him seemed to think he embodied.

As for his speech in Cairo, spare me the doting. His words echo almost exactly the same words that George Bush used, over and over and over. As John Caruso showed in his brilliant takedown, they could have read from the exact same telemprompter--the words are almost identical.

You really think that Obama--whose first official acts included bombing the crap out of Pakistani and Afghani civilians--is opposed to our bloodthirsty empire building? That he's really going to exert hard pressure on Israel? Not gonna happen. He and his "special envoy" Mitchell are pushing the doomed "two state solution" that nobody really believes is going to work. His SOS (much as I admire Hillary) has already talked about a preemptive strike on Iran.

The great "antiwar" president that you all bleated about has shown himself to be just as bellicose as McCain would have been, if not worse.

Hillary was deemed unacceptable by you lot because of her "vote for the war," so let me ask you, in the face of what Obama has done in the ME, and to paraphrase e.e. cummings, "How do you like your blue-eyed boy, Mr. Death?"

Anonymous said...

DancingPossum:

You've read me, and the history that backs up my statements, entirely incorrectly. You say, only an Obama acolyte would compare Clinton's early presidency to Obama's? Really? Were you an adult who paid close attention to politics in '93 onwards, or are you relying on reading about it retrospectively?

There were any number of things that Clinton reversed his campaign pledges on, or failed to accomplish what he had promised, and many of them were key promises that gained him critical votes. (At the same time, he was accomplishing his campaign pledges at a near-record rate, despite the many disappointments and reversals to which I accurately allude. You see, if you can do nuance, sometimes both things are true simultaneously!)

On NAFTA for instance, he had promised in the campaign that he would 'fix' it, to substantially overhaul it before giving it his support, to improve its provisions on environmental concerns, unfair competitive advantages, etc. To my recollection, no such 'fix' was in sight, and Clinton never pushed for it. But Clinton's campaign promises were key to protect himself against the forthrightly anti-NAFTA stance of Democrats in the Congress and throughout the country, to gain the nomination and the presidency using them, despite his true pro-NAFTA (minus improvements) stance.

Middle class tax cut? So that (middle class) people who play by the rules could get some help? How long in office was Clinton before he jettisoned that one, on the lame excuse that he had no idea how large the deficit had become (although the last fiscal year, whose deficit he was referring to, ended September 30, 1992, 2 months before the election, and more than 4 months before he took office)?

Clinton wanted a BTU tax, and forced Democrats in the House to make that painful vote in favor of it, only to burn them as he quickly allowed it to be stripped out of the bill in the Senate by one senator, David Boren.

Clinton promised a multi-billion dollar multi-year high-tech investment campaign for high-speed rail and other capital projects, especially valuable to his urban constituencies. He quickly trimmed the size of the package he was asking for, to the point that its opponents could discount it as entirely too small anyway, and that campaign promise quickly disappeared as well.

Eventually, with the luck of having incorrigible political foes, most of these early stumbles receded into the rear view mirror and out of memory, but AT THE TIME, Clinton looked every bit the mendacious pol as one by one, many crucial and central campaign positions were essentially dropped.

XI

Anonymous said...

Dude/dudette, I think you missed the part about Clinton having to deal with a repub Congress and a anti-Clinton media, thus having to wheel and deal...and Obama having to deal with a dem Congress and pro-Obama media, and...having to wheel and deal?. Get it? He's doing the same thing as Clinton did as though he had the same obstacles as Clinton did but he actually doesn't. Get it? Get it before it's too late.