Against: Fascism, Trump, Putin, Q, libertarianism, postmodernism, woke-ism and Identity politics. For: Democracy, equalism, art, science, Enlightenment values and common-sense liberalism.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Why I'm for Edwards
As regular readers of this blog know, we've seen many indications that the neocons hope to gin up evidence of Iranian WMDs -- and I'm not just talking about nukes. At the debate, Edwards was the only candidate to address these ominous signs.
Your man says things that Ralph Nader says, and I'm not using hyperbole (both parties are controlled by lobbyists and corporations is his latest tack). He's acting desperate, and it shows. Do you have any video from 2004? I wonder if he wore his pants so low (at hip level) back then. He's saying things the Republicans will use next year against Hillary. The guy's in crash and burn mode. I blame Kerry's people for that, for reining him in the last time. Edwards is an honest guy and a good guy, but it's his last chance, and he's hurting 'the party'. I hope you're right and I'm wrong.
Edwards may be selected this time around. In 2004 he flew to meet the this Bilderberg group. They select the President. In 2004 the Bilderberg group selected Bush to stay in charge. Edwars is a good puppet for the Bilderberg group. Also he voted for the invasion of Iraq. Also he voted for the patriot act. Also he worked on patriot act Legislation with Joe Lieberman to take away even more of our civil rights.
I shouldn't have printed this (a rule 1 and a rule 4 violation) but I thought I'd give a flavor of the kind of comment I've been getting lately. For some reason, the nuts are coming out again.
What gets to me are the ones who keep sending me variants of SIBPATS. What's weird is this: Every time I see a SIBPATS message, the sender genuinely seems to be of the opinion that I've never encountered that thought before -- even though the SIBPATS speech hasn't changed since I rejected it three decades ago.
4 comments:
Your man says things that Ralph Nader says, and I'm not using hyperbole (both parties are controlled by lobbyists and corporations is his latest tack). He's acting desperate, and it shows. Do you have any video from 2004? I wonder if he wore his pants so low (at hip level) back then. He's saying things the Republicans will use next year against Hillary. The guy's in crash and burn mode. I blame Kerry's people for that, for reining him in the last time. Edwards is an honest guy and a good guy, but it's his last chance, and he's hurting 'the party'. I hope you're right and I'm wrong.
Update from AitchD: I found some 2004 videos of Edwards, the trouser rise is inconclusive, but this bite bites because it's the Edwards I remember...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKKnFVg-6b4
Edwards may be selected this time around.
In 2004 he flew to meet the this
Bilderberg group.
They select the President.
In 2004 the Bilderberg group selected Bush to stay in charge.
Edwars is a good puppet for the Bilderberg group.
Also he voted for the invasion of Iraq.
Also he voted for the patriot act.
Also he worked on patriot act Legislation with Joe Lieberman to take away even more of our civil rights.
Re: Anon...
I shouldn't have printed this (a rule 1 and a rule 4 violation) but I thought I'd give a flavor of the kind of comment I've been getting lately. For some reason, the nuts are coming out again.
What gets to me are the ones who keep sending me variants of SIBPATS. What's weird is this: Every time I see a SIBPATS message, the sender genuinely seems to be of the opinion that I've never encountered that thought before -- even though the SIBPATS speech hasn't changed since I rejected it three decades ago.
Post a Comment