Tuesday, September 22, 2009

The acceptable bigotry

Salon wants to warn you about a menace to civilization. Another truly heinous act has been committed by the religion that all true Americans love to hate: The Catholic Church. This band of mind-controlling monsters has dared to request married couples to say -- get this -- a prayer!

Can you believe the audacity, the mendacity, the sheer venomous malignity? Requesting adherents of a faith to say a prayer?

My god, will this conspiracy never stop? Does the Vatican's wickedness know no limits?

Here, for the strong of heart, are the actual words of that (suggested) prayer. Warning: What you are about to read is sheer unadulterated Catholicism. NOT SAFE FOR WORK! Prepare a vomit bowl. Looking at this text is like looking at the charred remains of the victims of white phosphorus.
“Father, send your Holy Spirit into our hearts. Place within us love that truly gives, tenderness that truly unites, self-offering that tells the truth and does not deceive, forgiveness that truly receives, loving physical union that welcomes. Open our hearts to you, to each other and the goodness of your will. Cover our poverty in the richness of your mercy and forgiveness. Clothe us in our true dignity and take to yourself our shared aspirations for your glory, forever and ever. Mary, our Mother, intercede for us. Amen."
In the words of Joseph Conrad: The horror....the horror...

Now, some of you may be saying: What's the big deal? If the prayer bugs you for some reason, just don't say it. Nobody is required to utter those words. And if you're so very bothered, maybe you should simply attend another denomination's services. Or don't go to church at all.

Fools who say things like that do not understand the dangers of popery.

Sure, other religions may do as they please. Other religions can say: "How we pray is not the business of those outside the faith." Other religions may say: "If you don't like our beliefs and rules, simply leave." Other religions may say: "Although a church is not a democracy, nobody forces you at gunpoint to stay in the congregation." Other religions may say such things.

But, as Salon writer Francis Kissling wisely notes, Roman Catholicism is very different. The RCs are everyone's business, and those outside the church have a right -- nay, an obligation -- to insist that the Roman Catholics pray and believe only as directed by outsiders. Moreover, those raised within the faith who have decided that they don't like its teachings should not simply go elsewhere. They should stay and bitch, bitch, bitch. They should pretend that they are being held at gunpoint, because doing so allows them to indulge in their infantile persecution fantasies.

Thus, you are a bigot if you tell a Jew how to pray on Yom Kippur or if you tell a Muslim how to pray at Ramadan. But it is not bigotry to tell a Catholic how to pray.

Here's another important point: We must hold the modern Church responsible for any and all wrongs committed in its long history. But no other earthly institution, organization or group bears any responsibility for long-ago sins.

Thus, it is perfectly correct to keep reminding people that the Catholic Church burnt so-called "witches" -- but it is a grave error to note that Protestant churchman killed a larger number of "witches." (It is also necessary to inflate the number of victims from 50,000 or so to four or five million. That way, you can consider yourself persecuted simply by adopting the "Wiccan" label.)

The horrors of the Inquisition are a valid topic of modern conversation, because the Vatican remains responsible for that, and no amount of apology will ever suffice. But one must never bring up the mass murders of Catholics by Elizabeth and other British monarchs, because no-one alive today bears any responsibility for such things.

The Catholic Church stands damned forevermore because it did not completely abolish slavery in Catholic countries until the middle ages. Of course, one must never point out that slavery lasted until 1830 in Protestant England and until 1865 in the (mostly) Protestant American south. Never mention the fact that serfdom lasted longer in countries affected by the Protestant reformation. Obviously, all mention of 19th century serfdom under the Orthodox church is strictly forbidden.

Here's a test question: If you are an American liberal, which do you consider more evil -- the Catholic who opposes both abortion and the death penalty, or the Southern Baptist who opposes abortion but embraces the death penalty? I think you know the (politically) correct answer.

Those expressing their anti-Establishment leanings may proudly wear the Guy Fawkes mask. But don't ever bring up the issue that had Fawkes so hot and bothered.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Dear Lord, let us have lots of really intense orgasms."

Amen!

Anonymous said...

It occurs to me that the pre-sex ritual should be called "forepray"

Bookhorde said...

Marriage is one of the Seven Sacred Sacraments in the Catholic church* (remember St Paul's "It is better to marry than to burn"?).


*The other 6 are Baptism, Eucharist (Communion), Reconciliation (Confession), Confirmation, Holy Orders, Anointing of the Sick

Zee said...

Joseph, in general, I agree with you....anti-Catholicism is generally the only acceptable bigotry. Especially here in Massachusetts, where Catholic-bashing is a-ok, but you can't breathe a word against Mormon cult nuttery (oops! there I go again, myego2xu will be "publishing" another diatribe against my Mormon "bigotry")

But in this case, the writer is a Catholic. You could populate a few small states with the number of "recovering" Catholics whose #1 topic is theirs or other people's scarring experiences growing up Catholic. I personally don't get it, but I wouldn't lump it in with bigotry.

As for the prayer itself, what struck me is that who wants to invite God and the Mother Mary in bed with them to watch over the sexual exchange?
It reminds me of the Mooney cult, where the exact sexual positions are prescribed. What's with the spiritual peep show?

MrMike said...

Or four prey if you are a pedophile priest?

Zach said...

OK, well that begs the question.

I am always taken aback at the sheer degree to which otherwise acutely rational, insightful and even handed persons willingly allow their sensibilities to be so highly inflamed at perceived insult to their.. religion?

Why is that. No Im asking seriously. Not with regards just to your personal feelings but in general, this is an enduring mystery to me.

How is it that *this* should be the thing defended as the one last universally justified trigger to violent outrage? How, when the shouldering aside -- and skewering-- of provocations, the keeping of a good grip on ones horses, has been broadly agreed on as that virtue most fundamental to our durable civil safety and social contract? The thing which keeps the wheels turning, the lights on, and the carnage (mostly) off the freeways?

Really? Assault my physical, legal, personal liberties, property, ok. Threaten the safety or respect of ones family, ones good name or honor.. of course.

But should someone else, some irrelevant persons without actual power or leverage over one's immediate life, say or do something disrespectful or inappropriate regarding ones.. religion? *Thats* the button that shall always be freely pushed? the Line which Must Not Be Crossed, that one reserved provocation that may always be answered with overwhelming vehemence?

Really?

I surely mean no insult to you. And its common enough as well to Jewish and various kinds of Fundie protestant and Islamic people alike. I just cant get my mind around it. Now? Here, of all places? When that is our one gift, the one freedom we have always sheltered under that so few other nations have ever had? Freedom from affliction by those takings of everyday offense that always amplify into wave after unending wave of massive religious violence. Thank [deity], thats not how we do it here.

Of course I understand being pissed or insulted or offended by something. But thats not the question here.

lahana said...

Basically I find the idea of praying before sex to be most funny. But, as to why there are comments against the Catholic Church, maybe it is because they are the only major religion which has a single leader (the pope) in charge of the all the people in their faith worldwide, that he lives in a compound that is considered its own country, that nations send send ambassors to this "country", that historically the pope meddled in European countries' affairs and still feels that it appropriate to send out edicts as to how Catholic politicians need to vote accompanied by the threat of denying communion or excommunication if they do not comply. I'm sorry -- I do not like the idea of a German priest (now pope), deciding how my country should be run and what the laws should be regarding my life and reproduction.

Joseph Cannon said...

lahana: The Pope's "country" is one-third the size of the Los Angeles Zoo. His "compound" is guarded by laughable knights wearing comic-opera costumes.

Outside of those bounds, the Pope has no power. None. He decides nothing. He has no impact on politics. He has never sent out an edict telling Catholics how to vote as a matter of religious duty. He would not dare.

His only power lies in the use of words to persuade others. That's it. Honest. In other words, he has just as much power as you or I do, and therefore just as much right to say what he pleases.

People like you pretend otherwise in order to live out your infantile dream of persecution. This is psychological displacement at work: You want to project your own problems onto some foreign "other."

I've addressed all of this before, in the post and comments here:

http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2007/02/edwards-campaign-fires-anti-catholic.html

Excerpts (from the comments):

"I think I mentioned that I have no love for Benedict, and I wasn't crazy about Wojtilya, either. But there is, and always has been a Liberation theology movement, which cannot stay quiescent for long. And that is my point.

Americans think of the RC church as a monolith, as a factory producing robots, all programmed to think and behave and the same way. And it's just not true. There have been and will be Communist Catholics and Nazi Catholics and everything-in-between Catholics. There will be mystical Catholics and pragmatic Catholics. There will be doltish Catholics and ultra-intellectual Catholics. The Roman curia is the glue -- the very weak glue -- holding this insanely disparate group together.

Alas, not even a surgical operation could remove the "Rome creates robots" idea from the heads of ill-informed Prots. This perception bothers me, because within American Protestant Fundamentalism I see far less tolerance for variation, and far more robotic behavior."

Anonymous said...

Zee -

As for the prayer itself, what struck me is that who wants to invite God and the Mother Mary in bed with them to watch over the sexual exchange?

Well, I do, for one. I mean, God knows everything, so no matter how good I was, he could help me improve my technique. :)


Seriously, though, there are a lot worse things than having a being who is composed of more love than everything else put together actually there when you are making more of it.


----------------



Zach -

Why is that. No Im asking seriously. Not with regards just to your personal feelings but in general, this is an enduring mystery to me.

That's very simple. The When you insult someone's religion what you are really trying to do is intimidate them into giving up their belief. That's the first step on the road to - if I may use Orwellian terminology - not only thoughtcrime, but 'heartcrime' and 'soulcrime' as well. It's one thing to take away someone's mere physical rights, but to take away someone's mental, emotional, and spiritual rights, that's quite another. The mind, heart and soul are the inner bastions of the human being. If you allow those to be breached, there's no point in being physically free, since where it really matters, you would still be a slave.



---------


Joe -

I recall a Catholic leader pointing out that liberals didn't speak out when Catholics experienced bigotry, and someone on the AAR website responded:


"So what? They can defend themselves."


To which I replied:


"Hey, so I guess men don't have to speak out about sexism, or whites about racism, either. Good deal."


In my experience, of all the various Christians I know, I've found Catholics to be the most accepting...and the most fun. (In fact, I've commented to friends about how RC's are willing to ignore doctrine - no premarital sex, no contraception, to give some examples - if it means they can have more fun. :)



Sergei Rostov

Bob Harrison said...

The Learning Channel pinned the number of cooked witches in the millions. I am curious where you came up with the 50k number.

Joseph Cannon said...

The best book I've ever read on the witch-hunting craze was Norman Cohn's "Europe's Inner Demons." I seem to recall something like the 50,000 figure from that book, but memory may be tricking me. I do vividly recall that he used the words "fantastic exaggerations" to describe estimates over 100,000.

Brian Levack, author of the" The Witch Hunt in Early Modern Europe," estimates the number as 60,000. Wikipedia puts the number somewhere between 40,000 and 100,000.

The Learning Channel said it was millions? Boobs.

Anonymous said...

Bob -

Millions??? Would that have left any Protestants at all? (1/2 :))

TLC needs to have its "L" revoked.

(And that reminds me: the History Channel really needs to stop giving credence to every conspiracy theory it can find....)


Sergei Rostov

ginger said...

Joseph, nice post. I don't bother with Salon anymore since reading a really bad article that was obviously fictitious or at the very least it was not logically sound.

As for the Catholic church I have much more respect for that institution than I do for any of the Southern Babtists institutions that I am familiar with. I never understood the whole pro-death penalty thing with these folks. Heck, I don't even think most of them are familiar with the New testament strangely thinking that Moses teachings supersede Jesus' teachings.

As for saying a prayer before sex, especially sex for reproduction, seems rather sweet and loving. Right in line with the supposed concept of Christianity. Nothing wrong with that. Something seriously wrong with cheering at executions, praying for people to die, and so forth. Giving thanks for the best things in life is honorable and justifiable.

Joseph Cannon said...

ginger, I think we're on the same page here.

Look, people have accused me of being bigoted against southern Baptists. And maybe that is indeed a terrible fault of mine.

But I really do believe in what I once said before: Southern Baptists worship Ares, only they call him Jesus. (They'll deny it, but it's true.) Catholics worship Isis, only they call her Mary. (They'll deny it, but it's true.)

I'm not the kind to accept easily any claims of the supernatural. I don't believe that either Ares or Isis are real -- literally speaking. But poetically speaking, they ARE real.

And I have to admit that I much prefer Isis to Ares.

lori said...

What a lovely, sweet prayer. Humility is a lost virtue nowadays.

Zee said...

Joseph and Sergei, it may not be "scientific" or even "journalistically" true, but it's true nonetheless.

Catholics are more fun-loving people and the only ones to still worship a female deity. (Well....I don't know many Hindus, so I should amend that).

Anyway, I think that is connected in some way.

The Gay Swami said...

Joseph,

Persian crook Nemazee who is facing 30 years in the pokey for being on The One's payola dole is also gonna need a prayer.

'Nemazee' in Farsi means "one who prays.

Oh yes, Zee,

Hindus have more fun, although are much like Catholics in that when we screw up, we can always say "I'm soory" and get it off our shoulders in a next life. Or in a confessional - same diff.

DancingOpossum said...

Bear in mind, also, that the Catholic Church does far more charitable work than any other--and that service to the poor and downtrodden is a fundamental tenet of the church. Catholic Charities is enormous, well run, and does not proselytize when it sets out to help. The church has a long history of a lot of bad things but it also has a long history of alliance with unions and with working people (one of the sins that "cry to heaven for justice" is "defrauding the worker of his wages"-- yep, that's right up there with murder).

The stuff people believe about Catholics really makes me laugh; most of my Prot friends assume we're either neo-pagans who bathe naked in wine and worship brazen idols; or that we're all sexually repressed Opus Dei nutters who should be at home with their own fundie-ism. Many of them aren't aware that Catholics are not Bible thumpers (the joke among Catholics, in fact, is how ignorant we are about that tome). One friend of mine railed about how it isn't true that Catholic schools are any good because they still teach intelligent design--I had to point out that the Church incorporated evolution as part of its science teaching in schools looooong long ago, while the fundies are still duking it out over this one.

Yeah, I'm a Catholic. No, I don't subscribe to everything the church says nor do I even believe in the existence of a Magic Sky King, but I also acknowledge the good that the church has done, and continues to do.