Tuesday, June 17, 2008

He's back!

Thanks to a reader, I've learned that Jeff Gannon -- everyone's favorite he-ho turned "journalist" -- has a blog at the National Press Club's website. He doesn't contribute often -- once a month. Still, there he is, treated like a real journalist.

More than that. The chairman of the National Press Club, Steve O'Hearn, seems weirdly fascinated with Larry Sinclair, the fellow who has been making inane allegations against Barack Obama. Basically, Sinclair accuses Obama of being a Jeff Gannon -- with charges of drug usage thrown in.

Check out O'Hearn's blog, where he defends his decision to have Sinclair speak. Gannon, in the comments section, also likes the idea of giving Sinclair a stage. I wonder -- would O'Hearn and Gannon also have supported granting national attention to Marjorie Schoedinger, the late nutcase who charged George W. Bush with rape?

You will recall that the Obama campaign took its biggest hit when Jeremiah Wright defended himself at a National Press Club breakfast.

Something's up, methinks.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

In between sordid anal encounters of the republican kind and shaving his nutsack clean, Jeff Gannon is an outstanding journalist and much needed voice in today's corrupt media world.

Anonymous said...

BEST IDEA GOING

We can shut this Sinclair up for good and here's how:

PROVE HE IS LYING

Get it! It's frickin geeenyus. Go ahead and take a shot. I'll wait.

<>_<> HIDE AND SEE

Anonymous said...

Can't believe I'm writing this, but I've posted this Jeff Gannon article (Obama Unleashes Flying Monkeys, JeffGannon.com, June 17, 2008) in tomorrow's RW hotlist. He's spot on.

Anonymous said...

Sinclaire FAILED a lie detector test on the subject at hand.

http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/4799

Joseph Cannon said...

I know, Scott. Calm down. You did see the word "inane," didn't you? I'd apply that word even if he had passed the test, which isn't wholly reliable.

Anonymous said...

God. Just when I thought things could not get any more bizarre.

Anonymous said...

"SHOWED DECEPTION" = FAILED?

Dear Scott: I Googled that one. Wasn't there. But the Newage Webster Hope and Change Edition had it under: Revisionist Posturing. So I guess you're right. Everything we know is WRONG.

Now go make me a sandwich.
<>_<>

Anonymous said...

Hi Joe, I wasn't objecting to your remarks. I think it is OK to cover this. I was posting in response to 'bubba'.

Anonymous said...

YOU'RE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION BUT NOT YOUR FACTS

SCOTT: Respond to this: The link you provided did not assert Sinclair "failed" other than the lurid graphic which contradicted the body of the story (in case that got by you).

FACT: Larry Sinclair did not "fail" the lie detector test. If you feel compelled to get edgy over semantics take a tour of Obambi "Smear" site. Barfbags at the door.

Now get outta here before I go hillbilly jihad on you.

<>_<> Obambi/Obambi '08-infinity

Anonymous said...

See this article all about Sinclaire . Why would anyone believe anything he had to say?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11164.html