Obama says that he doesn't care for the "tax holiday" proposal to provide relief at the gas pump. I'm not sold on the idea myself. Still, it is amusing to note that Obama was once a big fan of such notions, back when he was an Illinois State Senator (and before he began palling around with the Milton Friedmanites).
In 2000, when gas prices were rising in Illinois,
Obama voted three times for a tax holiday.
The version that ended up becoming law required a six-month suspension of the state’s share of the sales tax on gasoline, a 5 percent tax paid directly by consumers rather than gas stations. It also required gas stations to post signs on their pumps saying that the Illinois General Assembly had lowered taxes and the price should reflect that cut.
As a state legislator voting for a tax break, Obama even joked that he wanted signs on gas pumps telling motorists that he was responsible for lowering prices.Here's the part Larry Johnson leaves out.
When Obama and his wife worked for the Daley/Rezko/Davis/Blagojevich political machine, the gang ripped off taxpayers incessantly. The revenue returned at the gas pump in 2000 was small compared to the amounts pilfered from the pockets of average citizens.
(All the quotes and facts below can be found in the "Indictment" series highlighted in the upper left-hand column.)
Illinois citizens are sick of paying the cost of corruption. A September 26, 2007 News Release by Steve Stanek of the Heartland Institute carried the headline: “Proposed Tax Hike Would Give Chicago Nation’s Highest Sales Tax Burden”Steal a dollar; repay a dime at the gas pump.
“Chicagoans would face an 11 percent sales tax rate, highest in the nation, if Cook County officials go through with a plan to more than triple the county’s portion of the area’s sales tax,” Stanek wrote.
An October 14, 2007 Sun-Times report by Tim Novak and Fran Spielman noted that,Incidentally, Buzzflash's Mark Karlin, of Chicago, recently gave a verbal blowjob to the outlandishly corrupt Daley. I would never be so cynical as to suggest that Daley money has helped to pay Karlin's bills. I would simply note that Karlin doesn't beg as often as he used to.
“When Mayor Daley asked Chicagoans to cough up $293 million more next year to finance the cost of city government, there's one tax he failed to mention: The Corruption, Waste and Mismanagement Tax.”
“It's almost impossible to calculate the cost of the Hired Truck, city hiring, minority contracting and police corruption scandals,” they wrote. “More than 1,400 people have staked claims to the $12 million fund created to compensate victims of the city's rigged hiring system.”
A March 8, 2008 report by Stanek in Budget $ Tax News on a Cook County Board Meeting in late December 2008 reported that:Michelle Obama worked as an assistant to Daley. She was rewarded with a do-nothing job -- paying over $300,000 a year -- for a crooked "non-profit" hospital that overcharged the poor.
“Complaints from thousands of angry taxpayers and infighting among county commissioners have held off nearly $890 million of proposed tax and fee hikes in Cook County, Illinois.”
If you want to understand Barack Obama's role in the Daley/Rezko machine, you may want to rent The Departed. In Martin Scorcese's instant classic, a criminal mastermind based on Boston's infamous Whitey Bulger spots a promising young man, buys him some groceries and comic books, and soon grooms him to become the underworld's "man inside" the Boston police department.
Although Obama was not recruited at so tender an age -- Rezko spotted him during his Harvard years -- the same principle applies. Obama went to work directly for a 12-man law firm run by a close Rezko crony named Allison Davis.
As for the most recognized allegation against Obama, that [he] helped slumlords operate in Chicago, while accepting their campaign contributions, its true. Obama was a member of the political machine that helped a whole gang of slumlords funnel local, state and federal tax dollars, over the backs of poor people in need of affordable housing, to line their own pockets and fund the campaigns of politicians in positions to recommend and award contracts.The Daley machine handed out the contracts for these taxpayer-supported unheated slum apartments to people who lacked any experience in construction or property management.
Davis and his partners, which include his sons Jared and Cullen, have received more than $100 million in taxpayer subsidies to build and rehab apartments and homes over the past 10 years and have made at least $4 million in development fees, according to the Times.
The Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland law firm, where Obama worked for nearly a decade, served as a hub for a slew of slumlord deals, many that benefited the firm's founder, Allison Davis, and Obama's claims that he knew nothing about the inner workings of this small firm, represent an insult to the intelligence of the American public.In fact, Obama knew full well what was planned:
On June 13, 2007, the Sun-Times reported that as a state senator, "Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting his political patron Tony Rezko's successful bid to get more than $14 million from taxpayers to build apartments for senior citizens."
"Davis has gotten deal after deal from the mayor, helping to make Davis one of the city's top developers," Tim Novak noted in the November 7, 2007 Sun-Times.In a debate, Obama claimed that his association with Rezko amounted to no more than five hours worth of legal work. An FBI informant later revealed that the two men met frequently and spoke on a near daily basis.
Tony Rezko was Obama's political Godfather. Obama received his first contributions of $2,000, to launch his political career as a state senator on July 31, 1995, from Rezko. Obama started out saying that Rezko only raised $50,000 or $60,000 for his political career but after a year of lying his way through the primaries, the latest total he gave to the Sun-Times and Tribune during interviews on March 14, 2008, adds up to $250,000.
For a year, he also minimized his relationship with Rezko by telling the media that he only had dinner or lunch with Rezko one or twice a year. But when confronted by Sun-Times reporters during the March 14 interview, with the allegation that an FBI mole saw him coming and going to Rezko’s office often and that three sources said he talked to Rezko on the phone daily, Obama changed his tune.
And let there be no doubt, Obama is a member of this corrupt gang. On January 22, 2007 ABC News in Chicago announced that Senator Obama “is supporting Mayor Daley's re-election bid despite a series of City Hall corruption scandals.”Obama has made no secret of the fact that he intends to create a "White House Office of Urban Policy" which will foist these shemes onto the entire nation. Remember the corruption that marked the Katrina clean-up? What Obama has in mind will dwarf those shennanigans.
Mayor Daley endorsed Obama for president a few weeks ago and the mayor's brother Bill is now an Obama advisor, the report noted.
“So in the spirit of political payback, Obama is endorsing Daley for re-election over two African American challengers despite a series of City Hall corruption scandals that Obama called deeply troubling as recently as a few months ago.”
It has come out at the trial that Rezko originally had tabbed Governor Blagojevich to carry their corruption scheme over to the national level. But Blagojevich's history is a little too obvious and inescapable. Thus, attention turned to Barack Obama.
In Illinois, favored politicians are joined at the hip when it comes to fundraising. For instance, from 1999 through 2006, an analysis by the Chicago Tribune shows Obama took in more than $1.5 million from some 700 people who also contributed to Mayor Daley during his political career.The primary victims of Rezko's tenement housing scheme were black. Similarly, most victims of hospital overcharging, as sanctioned by Michelle Obama, are blacks.
A cursory review of Illinois campaign records shows Allison Davis and his family members giving close to $16,000 to Obama's presidential campaign. The Sun-Times reports that Davis has donated more than $400,000 to dozens of political campaigns, and the top beneficiaries include Mayor Daley, Blagojevich and Obama.
If North Carolina's black citizens knew just how well the Obamas have "served" the African American community, they might choose to stay home on election day.
Not since Lyndon Johnson has so corrupt a Democrat come this close to the presidency.
Added note: This just came in from the Rezko trial...
Ali Ata, onetime executive director of the Illinois Finance Authority, told how, at Rezko's demand, he would pull piles of cash from a safe for payoffs -- once to keep a lien from being slapped on Gov. Blagojevich's home, another time to pay the debt of an adviser to the governor.Let me repeat: Barack Obama was on the phone nearly every day with Tony Rezko.
Ata was the last major witness before the prosecution rests -- probably Monday. He testified that he bought his state job. Ata told jurors that, although Rezko wasn't a state employee, he had to report to Rezko while heading the finance agency, having to "take orders and listen," or "not show up to work the next day."
Barack Obama lied about knowing the man until an FBI mole fingered Obama as a frequent visitor to Rezko's office.
Obama worked for Rezko's close business partner as they pilfered millions from Illinois taxpayers.
Rezko and his wife arranged for Obama to buy a mansion he could not have otherwise afforded. (Compare to the handling of the Blagojevich house lien above.)
And now an eyewitness says under oath that Rezko keeps huge amounts of money in a safe to pay off politicians!
21 comments:
It'll be...interesting to see how many comments you get on this one, Joseph.
I also understand that there was gambling at Ricks.
I'm sorry (I really AM sorry, that this is true, and that I have to live in it and talk about it, and try to get people to see it.) But there is a much larger picture.
O-bots are not the only bots. We are all bots and subject to being hanged for our mothers or families to find, or kidnapped and tortured, or robbed at the gas pump or in a thousand other ways. (Oh! but we're still free to play on the internet!)
By corrupting a government and turning it against its people, fascism allows private financier and corporate interests to control a nation.
The USA is being turned into a police state. War and famine are spreading across our planet. Nations are being destabilized, populations are being destroyed. It is deliberate, it is genocidal.
Optimism seems out of place in today's world, where fear is used to manipulate the public into surrendering its freedom, where new technologies are mainly used for social control and warfare, where science is generally portrayed as a danger to humanity, or a source of new diversions.
This is a war of ideas, a war over the ideas which will determine the nature of the political system (fascism or democracy) which will dominate the planet in our children's lifetimes.
A Malthusian world of resource shortages, austerity, and apocalyptic population reduction, ruled by fascist financiers and corporate cartels (and big-city crooks), OR what the United States--that is, the American System of political economy offers: scientific and technological breakthroughs which will raise the standards of living both in the U.S. and abroad.
Some of us are old enough to remember living in a society that sent human beings to the Moon--in spite of a "cold War" which had us as students drilling how to protect ourselves under our school desks, and visualizing such horrific nuclear attacks as we drilled.
With the oil hoaxes of the 1970s, the spot market was created, which, in turn, created a huge pool of dollars centered around the London-based international oil cartel. Through this mechanism, the U.S. government essentially lost control of the dollar, which became a weapon for a speculative ("free-market") assault on the U.S.A. The market price for oil is not set by OPEC, but by the financial markets.
The Chicago corruption is only a very small part of this.
The ongoing stealth financial collapse, combined with the horrific and stupid neocon American Empire fantasy, and the fascist policies tolerated by the Pelosi Democrats, have neutralized the ability of the United States to have a positive impact on the world, or even manage its own affairs, leaving the field wide open for the Brutish Empire and its stooges.
The Brutish rule by the tyranny of stupidity, subjugating people by making them too stupid to understand how they are being manipulated. It works! But only if we let it.
There is a clear way out of this if we but turn our minds, and put our muscle to it.
www.larouchepac.com
I know a lot of people in the close circle of politicians at different levels (school board, municipal, state and federal gov) and it's like this EVERYWHERE. That's the sad state of our "democracies". Even in corporations you have these kind of "payback" schemes between buyers and sellers.
You could only solve this with an open and transparent government system that would allow to link political contribution to contract given by the gov + a public financing system of elections that would remove corporate money from the system. Otherwise, it cost too much to get elected in the US and they ALL have to take dirty money in order to win.
Are Hillary or McCain saints without sins ?
Joseph, you are awesome!
This comment is in response to gary, but it's also a response to some insult-fests that I've decided not to publish.
Political corruption stories are, I've noticed, all pretty much the same. A businessman forms a partnership with a pol. The business gives the pol lots of money. The pol gives the businessman a city/state/federal contract which the businessman may or may not be qualified to fulfill. The contract may even be pure bullshit busywork. The businessman does the job on the cheap or not at all, and he pockets millions.
That was the long and the short of the Wilkes case.
When I wrote about that scandal, everone in prog-land said: "Great work, Joseph!" People were excited. It all seemed so very new and interesting.
The exact same thing is going on in the case of Obama, Daley and the Rezko gang. The sums of money are even larger in this instance.
But anyone who writes about it runs into a wall of yawns.
"Oh, all politicians do that. Big deal."
So what made Wilkes so much more intriguing than Rezko? It's not as though Duke Cunningham ever had a chance to go to the White House.
I'd really like an answer to that question!
And stop saying that Clinton and McCain were/are part of a political machine getting these sorts of kickbacks. It just ain't true. Compare FEMA under Bill Clinton to the FEMA chash machine which GWB ran for his cronies.
Another point.
Let's continue with our comparison of Wilkes and Rezko.
Who really got hurt in the Wilkes affair?
We all paid a little extra to Uncle Sam. And I suppose Wilkes' wife got hurt.
Now ask yourself: Who gets hurt by the Rezko/Daley/Obama/Davis/Blagojevich circus?
Well, there were the taxpayers of Chicago. Their taxes will go sky high to pay for all this Daley-style corruption. (I guess Karlin likes paying taxes.)
But we should also talk about the people who lived in the Rezko/Davis tenement buildings. They went for, what, some 16 months without heat. I have never lived in Chicago, but I understand that the winters are murderous.
There are also the lenders. For quite a while there, Fat Tony simply stopped paying his mortgage contracts.
And there's at least one semi-mysterious murder floating around in this mess.
So why is Wilkes/Cunningham really, really important? And why is Rezko/Obama really, really yanwsville?
Why the double standard?
I'd be happy right now, or no later than May 24th, for a coup d'etat by the JCS and the convening of a Constitutional Convention, if and only if the Department of Treasury and its Bureau of ATF people either resign or accept house arrest and everyone in DEA pee into a jar every day. It's more or less the best we can hope for.
I don't doubt that Rezko was corrupt and if convicted he should and will go to prison. Nor is he the first corrupt politician to spread his money around, and to both parties. At this point Obama is mentioned in the indictment, and that's all, assuming that he is the candidate mentioned. I have seen no indication that he is a target of Fitzgerald's investigation, and so I think it is misleading to suggest that he is. He has not been accused of any criminal wrong-doing. If he were to be indicted I would urge him to step aside. Harry Truman had connections to corrupt political machines,and all the unsavory and criminal elements associated with them.
This is old-style political corruption. I'm not defending it but I'm more concerned about the real danger of fascism rising in this country.I'm not even sure fascism is the right word here, perhaps someone will come up with a new name for it, after it's here.
Hi Joseph,
I really enjoyed this. This is why I came here last election cycle, and this is why I still poke my head back in looking for something like this.
For awhile I was turned away by the perpetual string along of Obama "lies" you were uncovering that were on the same caliber as the Hillary "lies" that you were trying to brush aside. I was turned away by the blind eye you would turn on the issues with Hillary (granted, plenty of places were covering them). You were starting to sound like the people you despise, devoting too much time and effort to spewing venom at Obama the same way you criticize others for turning into the negative hate-fest we saw in 2004 from the right.
This however. This is the kind of post I look for, and this is the kind of post that gives me the sort of information on a subject that I can't easily piece together from other sources.
Thank you,
Zachary
Well, gary, we've had quite a come-down here -- from Obama-the-Messiah to Obama-the-not-named-directly-in-the-indictment.
How much of what we've had to suffer in the past seven years was old school machine-style politics?
You know about Boss Tweed, or at least we've all seen "Gangs of New York." At what point does machine politics segue into fascism?
I'd argue that the point is reached when a cult of personality crops up. When the adherents of that cult turn into a howling mob of intimidating bullies. When people who don't like what's going on are cowed into quiescence for fear of that mob, like certain cowardly bloggers I can name.
But you are right.
Harry Truman was a machine pol, and he turned out to be a good president.
Will Obama turn out to be another Truman? In the end, I can only hope so. But I look at Goolsbee, Liebman, Axelrod, McPeake and Zbig, and I don't feel optimistic.
"At this point Obama is mentioned in the indictment, and that's all, assuming that he is the candidate mentioned. I have seen no indication that he is a target of Fitzgerald's investigation, and so I think it is misleading to suggest that he is. He has not been accused of any criminal wrong-doing. If he were to be indicted I would urge him to step aside. "
I agree with Gary on this. Don't you think you're launching BIG accusations against Obama without a lot of evidence apart from your hate for Obama and his supporters ? Don't you think Fitzgerald would hesitate to bring him to court if he had proof of any criminal conduct by Obama ?
And Hillary or McCain never received money from a corrupt businessman who is currently in jail ?
I've just caught some sleep, having coffee. Took my brain a full minute to attach the words Cunningham and Randy, will have very little free time for the next 8-10 hrs probably.
Interesting questions. Reading them, my track was "Important to whom?" What forces guide the discussion in different venues (blogosphere - national news - joe sixpac's living room - progland - inside the beltway, etc. To me, LaRouche/EIR is a venue.)
What "issues" (diff venues tend to focus on diff issues) are the names attached to at diff points in time?
The military, race (I hate that word), presidential race or in the oval office...
How much of the JFK assassination was old school machine-style politics?
I think differently about Truman than probably everyone here, but was "same as you" 6-7 years ago. I've noticed the name Truman coming up more frequently in blogland in the last 6 mos or so. I have a mind-object forming on that phenomenon, but communicating it, even to a patient audience or in a discussion with openminded people not all that easy.
I got to run. Wish I could stay. See you later. It's noon here now. Comments above with "morning" coffee. Good questions Joseph. And good article (just compare to Larry Johnson's -- not to be critizising him, but different venue...) Not previewing this.
Here in Missouri, I've been astounded at Senator Claire McCaskill's endorsement of Obama, supposedly convinced by her teenaged daughter--and her very public dissing of Bill Clinton after he headlined a huge fundraiser for her. No one seems to make the link between her husband, multi-millionaire Joseph Shepard who is in the low-income housing business, with Obama's involvement with Davis and Rezko. If you look at her financial disclosures you will see literally hundreds of his companies listed in several different states. I'm sure there must be some kind of connection between low-income scam artists, as St. Louis isn't that far from Chicago. As far as I know, Shepard has never been indicted. But, keep your eyes open for any connection to Obama.
OMG,....I am trying to catch my breath....wait....nahhh I need something stronger than air!
bee, you're acting as though you've already partaken of something "stronger than air."
Truman was a good president like his daughter was a good pianist. The only reasons he didn't warn his fellow Americans about the influence of the military-industrial complex were that (1) it had too many syllables, and (2) he thought of it as the son he never had.
"Well, gary, we've had quite a come-down here -- from Obama-the-Messiah to Obama-the-not-named-directly-in-the-indictment."
First, I've never confused Obama with being anything close to a Messiah. But let me address the second part of this. I've said before that although I've read the 3-part article you link to, I have not read the indictment. I assume you have, so what does the indictment say about the "political candidate" believed to be Obama? Merely being mentioned in an indictment is not, in itself, an indication of any wrong-doing. I have objected to the headline "Fitzgerald targets Obama." In the Valerie Plame affair I recall a good deal of discussion as to whether so-and-so was a "target" of the investigation, and as I recall the "target" was required to be notified if that was the case. Apparently "target" is a legal term of some sort. Admittedly either my memory or legal understand could be off-base here. At the very least, your headline implies that Fitzgerald is after Obama, which may not be the case at all. "Cannon targets Obama" is entirely accurate, however.
"What made Wilkes so much more intriguing than Rezko? It's not as though Duke Cunningham
So why is Wilkes/Cunningham really, really important? And why is Rezko/Obama really, really yawnsville? Why the double standard?"
Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT)
Post a Comment