Friday, February 09, 2007

The Edwards imbroglio: Left eye open, right eye blind

If Edwards can fairly be castigated for hiring bloggers who have published material offensive to Catholics, then why doesn't the Republican party suffer for its connections to Tim LaHaye, who has been deriding the Pope as the Antichrist since the 1970s?

How bigoted is LaHaye? Check it out:
It came to light that LaHaye's church in San Diego throughout the 1970s had sponsored an anti-Catholic group called Mission to Catholics. One pamphlet produced by the group asserted that Pope Paul VI was the "archpriest of Satan, a deceiver, and an antichrist, who has, like Judas, gone to his own place."
I started watching LaHaye in the 1970s. I can assure you that his Pope-bashing at that time was of the most primeval and superstitious variety.

He also has a problem with Jews, whom he has blamed for killing Jesus. A LaHaye quote: "Brilliant Jewish minds have all too frequently been devoted to philosophies that have proved harmful to mankind."

What kind of role does Timmy play in the conservative movement? Check it out:
In 1981 LaHaye founded the Council for National Policy—claiming, at one time, some 600,000 members. In the 1980s, the CNP was quite the political/religious machine; spawning countless campaigns and organizations. Included among its members were Ed Meese, John Ashcroft, Pat Robertson and, of course Falwell—as well as key think tanks, and activists like Grover Norquist and Oliver North. A lot of the "right-wing jihad" against President Clinton in the 1990s was funded by CNP supporters like Texas oilman and silver manipulator, Nelson Bunker Hunt, Richard DeVos of Amway and beer magnate Joseph Coors (the same crowd that funded the contras in Central America).

Impeaching Clinton was allegedly conceived by the CNP in Montreal in June of 1997. Falwell touts the CNP for helping raise hundreds of millions for ventures like Liberty University (the second largest Evangelical Christian University in America—surpassed only by Baylor (Baptist) University in Waco, TX). President Bush attended a CNP meeting at the start of his 1999 presidential campaign, and Rumsfeld took part in the group’s gathering last April in Washington, D.C. Republican political strategist, Paul Weyrich, once said: "Without [LaHaye], what we call the religious right would not have developed the way it did, and as quickly as it did."
(Emphasis added.) Also see here.

LaHaye was a key member of the John Birch Society in California. The JBS revived the ludicrous "Illuminati" conspiracy theory, previously the domain of such notorious anti-Semites as Gerald Winrod and William Guy Carr. In his books, lectures and other writings, LaHaye transported that canard into the "Christian" mainstream.

LaHaye was also one of "behind the scenes" figures involved with the creation of Fundamentalism's most notorious fake, Mike Warnke's The Satan Seller. That's the one which launched the whole Satan-gonna-getcher-kids meme which pseudo-Christians love so much.

Much of the paranoia which now characterizes Fundamentalism traces to the sick, sick Tim LaHaye -- recipient of Reverend Moon's funding and stalwart of the modern conservative movement.

Speaking of hate speech by bloggers connected to candidates, what about Free Republic participant and John McCain hireling Patrick Hynes? You should see what Media Matters has dug up on that guy.

It's the old, old story: Left eye open, right eye blind.

9 comments:

WWB said...

I think the answer is pretty simple: LaHaye doesn't work for a presidential campaign, and is not a public spokesman for any candidate.

That's not to downplay the awful things that LaHaye seems to believe, but to explain why LaHaye isn't getting the same kind of criticism.

If, say, Brownback did hire him, I'm sure you and plenty others out here on the Internets would have something to say about it.

Joseph Cannon said...

This makes sense, WWB, but I think we can still step back and look at things from a larger perspective. Melinda Henneberger today argues in the Huffington Post that Edwards' decision will alienate Catholic voters. Why shouldn't LaHaye be sued to alienate Catholics from the Republican Party as a whole?

I've been asking for just that since the 1980s. All it would take would be for a prominent Dem to make it an issue.

And ya know what? Edwards, if he were wise, maybe oughtta do just that. Might stir thinks up in interesting ways.

Imagine if Kerry had made an issue out of LaHaye when the Swiftboaters got going. Nobody would have CARED about what the swifties had to say. The public debate would have turned on a dime.

WWB said...

I still think LaHaye would have needed a close tie to the Bush campaign for it to be worth emphasizing -- the conservative groups he sits on aren't enough.

Unfortunately for Kerry, the Swift Boaters made an issue of him specifically -- a much broader effort would be needed to make LaHaye (or Robertson or Dobson) a major issue, and a presidential campaign probably isn't the best context. It would have to be ongoing.

Anonymous said...

This represents at least one more reason why I respect John Edwards -he understands how important it is to set a tone and to be consistent. Announcing his candidacy in New Orleans was a good start. Now, he's basically saying that he will not structure his campaign around the whims of the religious reich. You give these a-holes an inch and they take 100 miles. Edwards seems to get that. I wish more Democrats would follow suit.

Joseph Cannon said...

Anon, your point would be well taken if the Catholic Church were part of the "religious reich." In my view, it is not. Please see the comments in the post below about psychological displacement -- getting pissed off at Pat Robertson, taking a swing, and hitting the Pope in the nose. Americans do that ALL the damn time.

Anonymous said...

LaHaye, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, James Robison, James Kennedy and Rex Humbard and there ties to Moonies:

http://www.iapprovethismessiah.com/2004/04/left-behind-authors-fawning-letter-to.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1423175

All these "evangelicals" rubbing shoulders with a guy who openly SAYS he is the Messiah:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61932-2004Jun22.html

Evangelicals + Rubbing Shoulders w/Moon the Messiah = AntiChrist Fake Christians

ijits

Anonymous said...

sofla said....

The founder of Lutheranism, Martin Luther, exhibited virulent anti-Semitism. Are Lutherans going to be required to answer to that charge against the founder, and perhaps forced to deny their faith?

Mitt Romney is a Mormon, as is Senate Leader Harry Reid. The Latter Day Saints lump together the Catholics, the Eastern Orthodox (Greek and Russian), AND ALL PROTESTANTS (!) as apostates from true Christianity. Are we now going to witness pressure on them to deny these tenets of their faiths as well, or be accused of religious bigotry?

This guilt by association can get ridiculous. Actually, I cannot recall anyone being forced out because of such sensibilities except for the 'ethnic outreach' guy or guys for the first Bush administration, and they were basically unreformed neo-Nazi fascists.

In a rare sensible moment, when Reagan was asked to defend the positions of some of his various supporters, he explained THEY supported him and his policies, not the reverse, and their endorsing him didn't mean he was endorsing them at all, let alone all their views.

These kinds of demands that people make a show of firing people or publicly denouncing them remind me of Stalinist thought crime trials. People demanded, and thought it reasonable, for Mel Gibson to denounce his father's expressed views (although he refused).

That said, it seems to me that Edwards' statement ought to be sufficient to put this 'issue' to bed. So long as his bloggers didn't criticize Israel, at least.

Anonymous said...

sofla said....

The founder of Lutheranism, Martin Luther, exhibited virulent anti-Semitism. Are Lutherans going to be required to answer to that charge against the founder, and perhaps forced to deny their faith?

Mitt Romney is a Mormon, as is Senate Leader Harry Reid. The Latter Day Saints lump together the Catholics, the Eastern Orthodox (Greek and Russian), AND ALL PROTESTANTS (!) as apostates from true Christianity. Are we now going to witness pressure on them to deny these tenets of their faiths as well, or be accused of religious bigotry?

This guilt by association can get ridiculous. Actually, I cannot recall anyone being forced out because of such sensibilities except for the 'ethnic outreach' guy or guys for the first Bush administration, and they were basically unreformed neo-Nazi fascists.

In a rare sensible moment, when Reagan was asked to defend the positions of some of his various supporters, he explained THEY supported him and his policies, not the reverse, and their endorsing him didn't mean he was endorsing them at all, let alone all their views.

These kinds of demands that people make a show of firing people or publicly denouncing them remind me of Stalinist thought crime trials. People demanded, and thought it reasonable, for Mel Gibson to denounce his father's expressed views (although he refused).

That said, it seems to me that Edwards' statement ought to be sufficient to put this 'issue' to bed. So long as his bloggers didn't criticize Israel, at least.

Anonymous said...

John Edwards is no different than what else is out there. He will not even help the sick people in his own backyard. His home state of NC stopped all care and treatment for Americans with Lyme Disease, which is caused by a spirochete. Mr. Edwards has been asked to help Americans go to the doctor for years, he refuses to get involved. Sounds familiar doesn't it? John Edwards is busy promoting his two Americas.