Terror, nukes and Sibel Edmonds

I haven't much time to write, but I must pass along a couple of possibly-related items from Gary Buell's Covert History. Kill the Messenger, a new documentary about Sibel Edmonds, will shed some light on the revelations that the Bush administration has tried to muzzle. The official site, I should warn you, is a disaster area of poor design -- Edmonds' full name does not even rate a mention until you get to the small type.

But check out this paragraph from the promotional materials:

What she discovers is mind-boggling. The targets of FBI wiretaps are not only foreign individuals supected of espionage and terrorism in the U.S. but also their accomplices, that is...top officials at the State Department and at the Pentagon. These people are clearly engaged in criminal activities such as technological espionage, nuclear black market, heroin trafficking, money laundering, corruption of high-ranking officials, particularly in the U.S. Congress.

I remind readers that Bush's ally, Pakistan, still harbors and protects not just Osama Bin Laden but A.Q. Khan, the terrorists' favorite nuke-seller. Before 9/11, R.G. Abbas, a key agent of Pakistan's ISI -- that nation's CIA, closely tied to our CIA -- told an FBI informant that "those towers are coming down," indicating the Twin Towers. The ultra-important documentary 911: Press for Truth has much more information on the connections linking Pakistan, Al Qaeda, and the American neocon/intelligence networks.

An earlier Covert History post leads us to this remarkable story from the Canada Free Press site.

Urgent news from Abu Dawood, one of the newly appointed commanders of the al Qaeda forces in Afghanistan:

Final preparations have been made for the American Hiroshima, a major attack on the U. S. Muslims living in the United States should leave the country without further warning

(Emphasis added.) Buell voices all proper suspicions of this announcement. But the journalist responsible for the data is Hamid Mir, who has some major credits on his resume.

Mir's earlier reports regarding the resurgence of the Taliban with support from Iran and Russia and an unofficial truce (reported by some Western sources) between President Pervez Musharraf and al Qaeda have been panned out by the press in recent months.

Bush, who often comes thisclose to saying more than he ought, has pretty much confessed his foreknowledge of an imminent terror attack. (Scroll down for my post on the "time is running out" speech.) Meanwhile, the Navy is readying itself for a naval blockade of Iran.

As I've said before, a nuke going off in an American city will provide plenty of excuse for re-institution of the draft as well as an attack on Iran. The result will be World War III.

I find credible the assertion that a high-level network, including officials at the State Department and the Pentagon, have known about and abetted the acquisition of nukes by terror groups.

What can Democrats do? We need some pre-emptive action -- even pre-emptive rhetoric will do. The White House already pushes the line that anyone who criticizes Bush must be a ally of terror. Here's the counter-play:

BUSH CAN'T KEEP AMERICA SAFE.

BUSH LOST THE WAR ON TERROR.

Bush has engineered open borders. The administration refuses to secure our ports. This government has coddled Pakistan and Osama Bin Laden. The Bushites have hushed whistleblowers like Sibel Edmonds instead of encouraging them to speak.

Every Dem in the country should speak to these concerns, as loudly as possible, as soon as possible -- and they should do so before the next terror strike reconsolidates neocon power.