The case against Oswald as the lone assassin depends on this theory, which holds that one bullet, found mysteriously intact on a stretcher at the hospital (!), caused all seven non-fatal wounds in President Kennedy and Governor John Connally. (I'm glossing over many subsidiary controversies; see here.) Both the Warren Commission and the House Select Committee on Assassinations insisted that a process known as neutron activation analysis linked the chemical make-up of the bullet fragments, recovered from the wounds, to the bullet itself. The HSCA scientists repeatedly used the phrase "to the exclusion of all other bullets in the world."
Well, not quite. Chemist Pat Grant and mettalurgist Erik Randich of Lawrence Livermore beg to differ:
Randich's training as a metallurgist told him there was something wrong with this reasoning.The implications go beyond the JFK case. We must continually call into question the very nature of the evidence used in our courtrooms.
"I realized these people could put my sons in jail with bogus science," he said. "I thought I ought to do something about it."
By analyzing years of data kept by lead smelters, Randich found that batches are not unique, and bullets from different batches of bullets poured months or years apart could have the same chemical signature. And bullets poured from the start of a batch could differ slightly, but measurably, from those at the end.
He has testified in about a dozen cases. Because of his work, courts now reject bullet-lead analysis and the FBI no longer uses it as evidence.
We must also continue to rewrite our history books. By the way -- Arlen Specter invented the single bullet theory. The past never dies, does it?
5 comments:
Never dies, indeed. Mr. Specter is long overdue for his instant karmic payback, methinks.
Boyohboyohboy!!!!! Is Jen right about Specter or what!!!!!
Posing as a reasonable kind of nice-guy centrist, not unlike Joe Lieberman, Arlen Specter is an example of a shit-heel, bad-hat career-Senator, the likes of whom should never darken the Senate's doors. He's been in too long and he's been allowed to do too much damage. And yeah, he invented that single-bullet bullshit and should long ago been thrown out of the Senate, if only for that.
Joy Tomme
Ratbang Diary at: http://ratbangdiary.blogspot.com
sofla said...
Back when I studied the JFK assassination, I got the impression that the neutron activation 'confirmation' never DID provide a definitive match, as the language used back at that time merely claimed 'no signficiant differences' in the samples. It was widely claimed in the Warren Commission skeptic community that ANY difference was signficant, given the sensitivity of the test, and this claimed null finding (no difference) was actually itself instead a confirmation that these were different bullets.
This current finding seems incompatible with both the prior claimed null finding and the skeptics' claim I mention.
Specter has always been a puzzle. He clearly possesses a brain -- anyone who listened to the Bork hearings won't be in any doubt of that -- but his apparent craving to serve power evidently overwhelms his intelligence.
The "single-bullet" theory may have been false noblesse oblige -- create a narrative for the public, so the country could "move on" (to more of the same usurpations of power) -- but his recent fawning on Bush & Cheney has no such excuse.
He's like the bullied school kid, who will do anything to win favor from the thugs -- lie, cheat, etc. What a miserable creature, how he looks at himself in the mirror is a mystery.
sofla said....
A definitive way to answer this question would be to exhume Gov. Connally's body and remove the fragments of bullets that remained in him by presumably his physicians' decision (I think in several wound sites, maybe his wrist area and thigh).
If the fragments merely weighed more than the smallish amount of material squashed out of the bottom of the slightly deformed magic bullet, bingo, Connally was NOT hit by that bullet, but by a different bullet (as he himself always believed, until the day he died).
It's important enough to do so, IMO, that the Connally family's objections ought to be over-ridden in the interest of knowing the truth.
Post a Comment