Ann Coulter apparently does not like the photograph of her now adorning the front cover of Time magazine. She shouldn't complain. The photo shows no trace of the alleged "five o'clock shadow" which some cite as evidence for the thesis that she was born male.
However, Time deserves criticism for not confronting Coulter directly about the "Ann's-a-man" accusation, unfounded though it may be. Until she addresses the issue directly, until she issues an on-the-record denial, this country will continue to wallow in speculations which may, in fact, prove groundless.
Reporters have a duty to force Ann to speak up. It's the only way to get this sordid matter behind us.
3 comments:
Picked it up at the drugstore, leafed through it (wasn't going to buy the damn rightwing rag)...
Was looking at the picture of her/him as a child with sibling... It did occur to me to wonder which one was really the sister and which was the brother?
Was that her in the dress? Or was that her brother?
Come to think of it, in a media industry so poisoned by ideology and money, who knows if that photo's even the genuine family or just some anonymous kids who looked like a likely match?
Best not to bank too much on any apparent reality coming from that direction.
Joe, you can see some remnants of Coulter's failed hormone therapy here:
http://tinyurl.com/9nxq6
Try as 'she' might, Coulter still drags her knuckles like an old silverback. With mutant hands like that, she can't help it. Bit like Mikie Jacko's nose.
Very good page, nice nawigation, many things to read. And i have for you cool pages. See it!
raw xxx action*
groupsex swinger party*
captanstabin porn*
captanstabin vanessa*
asian brunette*
asian hot whore*
back seat thumbs*
bareback interracial*
xx anal*
guys fucking tranies*
Post a Comment