Wednesday, June 16, 2004

Bush v. Bush

Capitol Hill Blue really is turning out to be one of the more interesting publications out there (and yes, I know that an editor was once misled by a con artist; we all make mistakes). This piece claims that the elder Bush was against the Iraq adventure from the start, hence his silence on the war. The evidence is shadowy -- "sources close to the family," that sort of thing -- but the allegation buttresses all we have heard from other media outlets. The story also provides additional light on what I have called the Langley/White House war.

No comments: