Thursday, June 11, 2009

The worm turns and turns...

Feeling puckish, I submitted my sarcastic previous post about Obama to Buzzflash. I thought that my offering would make the progs furious. Surprisingly, it received a reasonably warm welcome, although it did not make the front page.

I was fascinated to learn that most of the recent submissions to Buzzflash listed under the "Barack Obama" heading reflect severe disappointment in the Lightbringer's administration. What a strange development! (As you will recall, Buzzflash was a prime dispenser of Hillary-hate during the primaries.)

Here are some examples:

Watching Obama Morph Into Dick Cheney
America has lost her soul, and so has her president.
Obama has defended the Bush/Cheney warrantless wiretapping program run by the National Security Agency and broadened the government’s legal argument that "sovereign immunity" protects government officials from prosecution and civil suits when they violate US law and constitutional protections of citizens. Obama’s Justice Department has taken up the defense of Donald Rumsfeld against a case brought by detainees whose rights Rumsfeld violated.

In a signing statement this month, Obama abandoned his promise to protect whistle-blowers who give information of executive branch illegality to Congress.

Obama is making even more expansive claims of executive power than Bush. As Bruce Fine puts it: "In principle, President Obama is maintaining that victims of constitutional wrongdoing by the U.S. government should be denied a remedy in order to prevent the American people and the world at large from learning of the lawlessness perpetrated in the name of national security and exacting political and legal accountability."

Obama, in other words, is committed to covering up the Bush regime’s crimes and to ensuring that his own regime can continue to operate in the same illegal and unconstitutional ways.
Will the O-fans call the author of this piece a racist?

AP report: Source claims Obama intel pick tied to CIA torture program
A former Bush administration official nominated by President Barack Obama to serve at DHS was linked to the CIA’s torture program, a source tells the Associated Press.

An AP article claims that a congressional aide “who spoke on condition of anonymity,” and wasn’t “authorized to discuss the matter publicly,” has “confirmed that [Philip] Mudd, who was deputy director of the Office of Terrorism Analysis at the CIA during the Bush administration, had direct knowledge of the agency’s harsh interrogation program.”
In 2006, FBI agents feared Mudd wanted them to engage in ‘ethnic targeting’ and mocked him as ‘Rasputin’; Once allegedly ordered FBI agents to search falafel sales records to find Iranian terrorists
Team Obama/Cult Obama
Yet, these commentators are impressed, in many cases very impressed. In the world at large, this frame of mind borders on a cult.
I could go through the talk Obama gave in Cairo and point out line by line the hypocrisies, the mere platitudes, the plain nonsense, and the rest. (”I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States.” — No mention of it being outsourced, probably to the very country he was speaking in, amongst others. . . . “No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.” — But this is precisely what the United States is trying to do concerning Iran and North Korea.)
Writer William Blum then goes on to compare Obama to Hitler -- something that even the Confluence would probably consider out of bounds.

Obama May Allow Even More Arms Exports Than Bush
A Boeing executive predicted that the Obama Administration would allow exports of even more advanced US weaponry than his predecessor George W. Bush did.
When you think about it, this development provides some substance for the right-wing "Obama's a socialist" meme. Military contracting is arguably the most socialized aspect of our economy.

The Privatization of Obama's War
The President asserted in his Cairo speech on Thursday that he has no desire to keep troops or establish permanent military bases in Afghanistan. But according to Jeremy Scahill, “I think what we're seeing, under President Barack Obama, is sort of old wine in a new bottle. Obama is sending one message to the world,” he told Moyers, “but the reality on the ground, particularly when it comes to private military contractors, is that the status quo remains from the Bush era.”
A Bush In Sheep's Clothing
"It is also undeniable," the president said, "that the Palestinian people – Muslims and Christians – have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than sixty years they have endured the pain of dislocation."

Suffered in pursuit of a homeland? The pain of dislocation? They already had a homeland. They suffered from being ethnically cleansed and dispossessed of it and prevented from returning on the grounds that they are from the wrong ethno-national group. Why is that still so hard to say?

He lectured Palestinians that "resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed". He warned them that "It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered." (Note: the last suicide attack targeting civilians by a Palestinian occurred in 2004)

Fair enough, but did Obama really imagine that such words would impress an Arab public that watched in horror as Israel slaughtered 1,400 people in Gaza last winter, including hundreds of sleeping, fleeing or terrified children, with American-supplied weapons?
Time to Look Past Obama’s Words and Face-up to His Action
On Israel, Obama has created a small divide with Israel. He is urging Israel to stop expanding the settlements, something that is not a breakthrough in new policy. Israel is refusing, as they always have. But, Obama is saying nothing about the illegal security wall, the ongoing abuse of the people of Gaza, the continued demolition of homes in the West Bank and Jerusalem nor is he threatening to do anything if Israel continues on its land-stealing path. Indeed, he promises to continue to provide all the funding Israel has sought as well as provide all the weapons they need. Thus, Obama’s actions continue to make the U.S. a facilitator of Israel’s abuse of the Palestinian people.

When it comes to the military budget, the Obama administration is seeking more funds – not less. And, the budget submitted by the administration continues the practice of falsity with the understating military and homeland security costs. He is, so far, continuing the practice of seeking supplemental funding for wars.
Perhaps the worst news is the relative silence of the peace movement. Yes, some are criticizing, but some are still holding out hope that Obama is different. Others of us pointed out that buried beneath the peace-friendly rhetoric during the campaign were Obama’s promises of escalation. Now, more and more are seeing he meant what he said when it came to his support for a hawkish U.S. foreign policy.

Can you imagine the uproar if President Bush had taken these actions?
Well. Well well well.

If you want to see stories castigating the president, there's no need to visit Cinie or the Confluence or Red Dragon or No Quarter or even (gulp) Cannonfire. Everything you need to know is being collated on a site that once publicized nothing but pro-O puff pieces.

Still no apology...

Added note: From Joan Walsh in today's Salon...
I was on "Hardball" today talking about the climate of extreme right-wing rhetoric today, and whether it had anything to do with Wednesday's tragic shooting at Washington's Holocaust Museum, or the May 31 murder of Dr. George Tiller by an antiabortion crackpot.

I tried to choose my words carefully. Unless it's shown that either man had accomplices, we have to be clear that the men responsible for those murders are the ones who pulled the trigger. Still, it's hard not to think about the extreme right-wing rhetoric, especially about Barack Obama, and whether it could conceivably lead to more right-wing violence.
What about the tons of hate-talk offered by the pro-Obama forces during the campaign? What about the transformation of Kos, D.U., AmericaBlog and TPM into festering cesspools of cyber-rage? What about the death-threats?

Apparently, that genre of extremist rhetoric does not trouble Joan Walsh...

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sounds like it's time to start short-selling Kool-aid stock.

MrMike said...

Are those submissions to Buzzkill the work of O-bots on kool-ade withdrawal or the more moderate (oxymoron?) Obama supporters?
I'm sure there are good and decent people who honestly thought Obama was the best choice during the primaries, at least 4 or 5 in number.

Marsha said...

Walsh is using a classic ploy - try to make everything about Obama. Remember the primaries and if Bill Clinton hiccuped, they claimed he was belching about Obama and went on a rant.

Tiller the the Museum killings are the result of the conservative social agenda this country has moved toward for the past 30 years and, IMHO, the rise of the "Christian Country" mentality (which are both things that Obama embraces himself).

Trying to say it was about Obama is BS.

Just Me said...

Joan Walsh, the msm, and all of the prog folks are all over the Museum shooting, trying to lay blame upon anyone but the deranged shooter, and of course still placing responsibility for Tiller's murder on everyone who did not vote for Obama.

I am not denigrating the outrage, nor minimizing the tragic consequences of either of those insane acts.

However, I certainly would like to ask Ms. Walsh, the msm, and the dozens of aforementioned bloggers when, if ever, does the hue and cry of outrage start regarding the terroristic killing of Pvt. William Long, 24, of Conway, Ar.and the wounding of Pvt.Quinton Ezeagwula, 18, of Jacksonville, Ar.

They, and their families apparently do not even merit empathy, muchless remorse or outrage.

Dr.Tiller has been mentioned much in all of the hudreds of writings re the Museum tragedy, yet I found not a single reference, not even in comments, regarding the soldiers.

Such an omission is not surprising, given the prog agenda. However, it is deeply disturbing, and certainly indicative of how every insane, senseless, violent act, that can be somehow be politically useful, will be seized upon by the far left as a conspiracy.

Surely the perpetrators could not just simply happen to be nuts. they had to have been inspired by opponents of Obama, and the far left.

Unlike the killer of the soldier, who most likely was a victim of repression, and acted solely out of frustration. Nevermind the fact that he trained to vent his frustration.

Searching Google, I found only one instance where Salon even mentioned the death of Pvt. Long, and that was merely by publishing an AP article re the funeral.

We are in for a long, turbulent ride. And, I thought Bush and his fanatical followers/apologists were as bad as it could get. I think I may have "misunderestimated".

glennmcgahee said...

"If Obama does not get the nomination, there will be blood" - Donna Brazille, May 31, 2008.

Anonymous said...

"Just Me" -


First, how many stories Salon (or even the MSM) are publishing in the cases mentioned here is almost completely a result of what gets ratings: for reasons which should be obvious, the killing of soldiers "isn't news" relative to the killing of an abortion doctor.


Surely the perpetrators could not just simply happen to be nuts.


I note that you are saying what right-wingers say when this type of thing happens: it's just the actions of individuals in a vaccuum (it couldn't possibly be a result of some deeper issue, so don't look for one).



But done by "nuts" or otherwise, these incidents are indicative (and symptomatic) of what is going on in the society of which said individuals are a part. People go on TV and erroneously rant unchallenged about how abortions are murder - that leads to the demonization of women who get them (with all the results thereof) and even the killing of doctors who perform them; wingnuts spout Jewish-world-conspiracy nonsense, Bush and many prominent right-wing evangelists belong to Christian sects which say all Jews must be killed - that leads to shootings at a Holocaust Museum.


I'm not going to lay the blame on "everyone who did not vote for Obama", but I will place it where it belongs: beliefs either endemic to the right-wing philosophy or encouraged (sometimes embraced) by the right-wing leadership.


At this point, however, I'll also note that the "far left" is really a sort of mirror-image of the mainstream right: opposite views on issues, but same tactics (dishonest, unethical, even criminal), same view of goverment (don't ask anything of me, leave me alone, but give me money), and same inward desire (rule the masses with an iron hand 'for their own good').


Sergei Rostov

Just Me said...

Sergei Rostov,

First let me say that I always enjoy your comments, including this response, and most always agree.

Also, I am glad that you choose my favorite, must read blog (followed by TC and Somerby), to do so.

I admire most on here for their ability to ably contribute.

I, on the other hand, though a devout reader seldom comment. As a life-long, provenly successful, public speaker (except for failure of ERA), I find it hard to be succinct, concise, and brief enough to feel that I am less than a bore.

In speaking, I have always relied on infinite detail, redundancy, positive rhetoric, and even a bit of down-home, satirical homiletics to make my point. I tend to write as I speak, and said practices do not seem to translate very well to blog commentary.

Blog commenting (and of course blogging itself), as speaking, seems to be an art, and as stated earlier I admire those who do it well. I consider Joseph to be the master blogger!

Having said the above, I will now try to respond, in a second post, to a couple of your comments referencing mine, S.R.

kenoshamarge said...

I left BuzzFlash over a year ago and never looked back. They emailed me and wanted to bury the hatchet after the elections and I let them know that I would neither forgive nor forget. And that they wouldn’t like where I would like to bury the hatchet.

As for blaming either right or left-wingers for the actions of insane individuals what results in effect a muzzle on freedom of speech. If the hatred drenched words coming from both sides were responsible for violence then this country would be blood drenched from sea to shining sea. More blood is spilled in a single day by gang related violence and greed than in all the right or left wing ranting put together.

Demented individuals doing demented things are the ones responsible for their actions.

Reprehensible as David Letterman's words were about Willow Palin being impregnated by Alex Rodriguez do we then blame him for the next rape of a 14 year old girl? Much as I loathe what he said I will not.

Joan Walsh was too clever by half with her slimy phrasing. Her "I don't want to blame them but I'm gonna do it subtly” is hypocrisy I would have once thought her incapable of.

Unfortunately in Obamanation there is no hypocrisy too obvious any more than there is in the GOP.

Anonymous said...

Glad to hear it Marge. I started reading comments on Buzzflash shortly before you left, but I've seen several commentors lamenting the fact that "Marge from Kenosha" had left. Can't say I blame you, although I drop in occasionally to rub the Clinton-haters noses in it. Nothing even remotely like what they said about Hillary Clinton during the primaries, but enough to get them riled up. Mark has laid off of Hillary now that he has his guy in office, particularly around fundraising time, which these days is all the time at BF. While many commentors and even writers have acknowledged their disappointment in Obama, Mark has been very mild in his criticism. He blames his fundraising difficulties on the economy, as opposed to the fact that he drove away a good portion of is readers through his ridiculous attacks. Anyway, glad you told 'em where to put the axe.

It's kinda fun. :)

Zee said...

"And that they wouldn’t like where I would like to bury the hatchet."

~:) Heh. Indeed, kenoshamarge!

Mark O-fluffer Karlin was worse even than John Aravosis (who is pitching a fit these days as if any of Fraudbama's moves are a surprise).

It would've been one thing had he merely had a mancrush on the fraud. But I knew when he completely skipped "Blue Dress Day" that he was going to actively join in the Clinton-bashing as well.

No forgiveness for him, ever. And, the war is now Obama's war and by extension all the Obots war, too. The torture photos, the no accountability, the no Freedom of Choice, the DADT, all of it on the O-Dupes.

And, "Just Me," if BuzzlipstoObuttflash is a "must read" you need to detox from Hopium.