Why does Slate promote anti-white racism?

Here's a passage from a Slate story by a woman named Julia Craven, who tells her readers why she took up riding a stationary bike.

But setting up the bike to work with my body took too much energy, and it had to be done each time I walked into a studio. And I often felt those classes were just too white. I can’t recall having a Black instructor or even someone of color. These instructors exist, of course, but so scarcely that I never ended up in one of their classes even though I tried.

Julia Craven, you are an anti-white bigot. 

 

I don't want to hear your excuses. I don't want to hear any bullshit along the lines of "But...history!" I reject all use of the word "history" to rationalize offenses against Equalism.

 

What do I mean by Equalism? I mean the Golden Rule. The idea is easily grasped if you conduct this simple exercise: Mentally rewrite Julia Craven's passage with the words "white" and "Black" reversed. 

 

(Being a bigot, Craven capitalizes Black while leaving the hated word white in lowercase. Yes, I've heard the arguments justifying this practice. Those arguments are racist gibberish.) 

 

What would we conclude about a white writer who offered the following text?

And I often felt those classes were just too black. I can’t recall having a White instructor or even someone brown or Asian. These instructors exist, of course, but so scarcely that I never ended up in one of their classes even though I tried.

What would people say about me if I expressed so inexcusable a sentiment about a black instructor in any field -- fitness, art, literature, music, cooking, math, auto repair, biology, anything? I would be excoriated, and properly so. 

 

And yet nobody will castigate Slate for publishing this bigot. Our society's insane tolerance of anti-white racism will have -- has had -- a completely predictable backlash. The hated will hate back: Such is human nature. Critical Race Theory is a machine that makes racism. 

 

The machine was deliberately engineered for that very purpose. The bigots who promote Critical Race Theory want separatism. Having succeeded in re-segregating dorms on many college campuses, they won't rest until they've enacted Farrakhan's dream of a re-segregating all of society. 

 

CRT advocates make no secret of the fact that they hate liberals like me far more than they hate the Proud Boys. Anti-white bigots are every bit as dangerous as anti-black bigots; the two should be considered allied forces. I've said it before and I'll say it again: Hitler was the ultimate exemplar of Identity Politics.

The purpose of CRT is to distract progressives from thinking about class. Forget about the One Percent; ignore Peter Thiel and the Kochs. Your true enemy is some inarticulate white dude working the midnight shift at 7-11. That's the message.

 

Do you honestly believe that Robin Di Angelo would have any support from corporate America if her message was "Return tax rates to 1964 levels"?

Do you know how I get my exercise, Julia? I walk. I walk because I rarely can afford bus fare these days. Do you have any idea how decadent an article like yours seems to eyes like mine?

 

Who speaks for the struggling -- a guy like me, who rides the bus (when he has the fare) and who buys clothing from thrift stores (but only the half-price items)? Or a hopelessly bourgeois narcissist like Julia Craven, who drives her nice car to the gym and who can afford luxury items like exercise classes and Pelotons? When was the last time you rode the bus, Julia? When was the last time you subsisted on biscuits in gravy?

Who does your nails?

CRT is used by the oligarchs to divide an ever-more desperate working class against itself. The academics and writers who promote CRT do not speak for the oppressed class; they serve the oligarchy. 

 

And they are well-compensated for their efforts. For this truly privileged cadre, life is a swirl of lattes, Pelotons, iPhone upgrades, gallery openings, lovely vacations, designer clothing labels and shopping excursions to Whole Foods. And throughout it all -- hilariously, obscenely, infuriatingly -- they snarl and sneer at those who live in basements and eat rice and beans from the food bank. 

 

They dare to call me privileged. Well, I'm gonna exercise my privilege to say go fuck yourselves.

 

There is only one way to expose their propaganda for what is: We must identify and castigate any writer, of any race or sex, who propagates a non-Equalist view. Only Equalism is legitimate; only Equalism is moral; only Equalism serves the working class. All else is bigotry disguised by casuistry.