Monday, June 03, 2019

Epstein: Why the cover-up will continue

From the Daily Beast:
But in February of this year, a federal judge ruled the non-prosecution agreement (NPA), which was concealed from the victims and their counsel, violated the law, specifically the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Now the feds are contacting victims to discuss possible remedies.

During these meetings, the government is reportedly asking one question in particular: Did Epstein’s abuse ever cross state lines?
In other words, the government is asking: Should this case be tried at the federal level?

Obviously, it should. I've studied the flight logs of Epstein's jets (he had two), which clearly show that the underaged Virginia Roberts and other girls accompanied him on various flights. Roberts went to both Epstein's New York palace and to his private island.

It must never be forgotten that Roberts, then 15, was recruited at Mar-A-Lago by Ghislaine Maxwell, who seems to have had some position of authority there.

(Despite what you've read elsewhere, there is no evidence that Roberts -- or any other Epstein girl -- ever shared a flight with Bill Clinton or that Clinton ever went to Epstein's island. Epstein gave Clinton a lift to various international conferences, and all of those trips were covered by journalists. You may also have run into a particularly bizarre claim that Stephen Hawking, of all people, attended Epstein's orgies. That absurd assertion traces back to a 2006 article which appears to have been just an exercise in dark humor -- albeit one in extremely poor taste.)

The evidence is clear that Epstein was involved not just in moving girls across state lines but in international trafficking. See here:
The private Caribbean island, called Little St James, allegedly became the scene of riotous orgies involving under-aged girls flown in from eastern Europe.
And here:
Which included, for the record: buying a 14-year-old Yugloslavian named Natalia Marcinkova from her parents in order to keep Marcinkova as his “sex slave”; paying a retinue of women to trawl Palm Beach for teenagers economically desperate enough to agree to give Epstein “massages” that often led to sexual contact; receiving two 12-year-old French girls as a “birthday present”; and befriending Michael Wolff.
(Wolff's in the news again, isn't he? We will talk about his latest soon.)

The same source quotes the Daily Beast:
Perhaps most disturbing, in terms of possible sex trafficking, was Epstein’s relationship with Jean Luc Brunel, owner of the MC2 modeling agency. According to a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, an alleged victim said that Epstein, [assistant and girlfriend Ghislaine] Maxwell, Brunel, [house manager Alfredo] Rodriguez, and Marcinkova ‘deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved luring minor children through MC2, mostly girls under the age of 17, to engage in sexual play for money.’
Finally, I draw your attention to this important piece by Vicki Ward:
Epstein is known about town as a man who loves women—lots of them, mostly young. Model types have been heard saying they are full of gratitude to Epstein for flying them around, and he is a familiar face to many of the Victoria’s Secret girls. One young woman recalls being summoned by Ghislaine Maxwell to a concert at Epstein’s town house, where the women seemed to outnumber the men by far. “These were not women you’d see at Upper East Side dinners,” the woman recalls. “Many seemed foreign and dressed a little bizarrely.” This same guest also attended a cocktail party thrown by Maxwell that Prince Andrew attended, which was filled, she says, with young Russian models. “Some of the guests were horrified,” the woman says.
As I've noted on more than one occasion, when it comes to the trafficking of underaged women from eastern Europe, the name of one crime lord stands out: Semion Mogelivich. He controls that racket -- or perhaps I should say "controlled" in the past tense, since he's getting on in years. He's pretty much untouchable. And he can be connected to Trump through various associates, primarily Felix Sater. This story from 2004 is worth citing:
According to Friedman, "Mogilevich's lieutenants are trained in intelligence operations and countersurveillance, and provide warnings of impending police actions...." They are experts at compromising Western security services, especially by making secret agreements to provide information on rival crime groups. Mogilevich's organization blends East Bloc intelligence professionalism with arms smuggling, money laundering, extortion, prostitution, drug trafficking and murder. Meanwhile, Mogilevich's "former" East bloc intelligence professionals are teaching al Qaeda how to set up safe houses and smuggle weapons.
Lots of people on the right and the left love to talk about Epstein's fixation on underaged girls, but far fewer people are curious about an even more important matter: How did he make his money?

That question has baffled Epstein-watchers for many years. We are told that he is some sort of "money manager" who works solely with billionaires, none of whom are named. I am not the only one to speculate that Epstein launders money for eastern European mobsters and oligarchs, and that he may have used their ill-gotten gains to back his own investments. Frankly, no other theory makes sense.

Several sources claim that Mogelivich uses "his" girls to entrap VIPs around the world. (It's easy to imagine a situation in which a girl's age is not revealed to the target until the morning after.) According to Virginia Roberts, Epstein also uses "his" girls to obtain blackmail material on important people. 

And that's why I doubt that the Florida authorities will be allowed to expand the Epstein inquiry to the federal level. Trump will put a stop to it. He has no choice.

I've quoted these tweets from John Schindler in a previous post:
You need to understand real estate finance, and Russian organized crime AND Russian intelligence...if you do, the picture is quite clear. Mogilevich is the biggest mob boss in Russia -- maybe the world -- and his capos+footprints are all over the Trump Org since early 1990s.

Mogilevich launders money in the West, including the USA, on a gargantuan scale; he is clever and good at this. FBI knows all about it.

In 1992, Mogilevich sent a capo to NYC to run his US show. That was Yaponchik AKA Vyacheslav Ivankov, who was murdered in Moscow in 2009. Yaponchik/Ivankov -- for 3 years until the FBI caught up with him -- was dividing his time between Trump Tower & Don's Taj Mahal Casino. There are literally dozens of Russian OC scams, some gargantuan, that we know were based at Trump properties -- quite a coincidence.

The real issue is how Mogilevich made the Trump Org one of his overseas subsidiaries, de facto, back in the 1990s. FBI knows this too.

Also, Mogilevich has a very cozy relationship with Putin & his special services, going back to KGB days. They help each other non-stop. Not long after Sasha Litvinenko told reporters about Putin's close links to Mogilevich, FSB gave him atomic tea. Another coincidence. There's an old IC joke about Russian organized crime: "Who do you think organized them?"

Trump being in bed with ROC = in bed with FSB
We are in very deep waters here. Again: Trump cannot possibly allow any of this to come to light. If Epstein is cornered on a federal charge, he may talk.

9 comments:

b said...

The simple fact is that in the late USSR the strongest organisation was not the CPSU (as countless western sovietologists assumed, both conservative and liberal) or the army (as Cornelius Castoriadis was led by ideological stubbornness to believe); it was the KGB. If the KGB had wanted to wipe the mafia out, they could have done. It would have been terribly bloody. Just sorting out the prison system would have meant widescale butchery, let alone the airports, antiques, hotels, sports clubs, car supply networks, legal system, and so on. Why didn't they? It's not because they were evil and it's certainly not because they were stupid. It's because the mafia was amazingly useful (it's really a no-bullshit world), because it was already essentially on the same page and involved in the same types of activity, and because if they had even begun to confront it they would have found they were setting something up that looked very similar.

In 1991 the KGB did not disappear like the party, nor did its leaders rush to flog off whatever they could, as certain senior army officers did. It got stronger. One can ask a question which goes even further than John Schindler's cited question regarding who organised Russian organised crime. Here it is: who organised all those regime changes in Eastern Europe?

Looked at from an FSB POV, the idea of Estonia in NATO is thigh-slappingly funny. The same can be said of Mogilevich's little possession Hungary (or wait - does he share some of it with George Soros?) and for that matter Poland.

(PS: Joe, some feedback: the ReCaptcha here drives me half mental.)

gadfly said...

In 1994, Trump went to a party with Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire who was a notorious registered sex offender, and raped a 13-year-old girl that night in what was a "savage sexual attack," according to a lawsuit filed in June 2016 by "Jane Doe." The account was corroborated by a witness in the suit, who claimed to have watched as the child performed various sexual acts on Trump and Epstein even after the two were advised she was a minor.

"Immediately following this rape Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I ever to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump's sexual and physical abuse of me, my family and I would be physically harmed if not killed," Jane Doe wrote in the lawsuit, filed in New York.

The lawsuit was dropped in November 2016, just four days before the election, with Jane Doe's attorneys citing "numerous threats" against her.

joseph said...

Is the Nader indictment for child pornography related?

Joseph Cannon said...

gadfly, I believe you are talking about the "Katie Johnson" case. I've written about that from the very beginning -- she was Katie before she was Jane -- and I've always been suspicious of it. One reason for my suspicion is that her tale was heavily pushed by Robert Morrow, a crony of Roger Stone.

I could swear that, around the time she withdrew, I ran into a story that revealed her real name. Can't find that article anywhere. Maybe memory is playing its usual tricks.

My earlier stories explain why I think that this story is a ringer. Bottom line, she reveals nothing that was not out there already, and her description of Trump is just too pat. The original complaint read like bad fiction.

As always, I'm willing to revise my opinion as new facts come out.

Anonymous said...

To Joseph, the creator of the most amazing artwork I've ever had the pleasure of viewing. Saw this on DU & thought of you:

https://www.chonday.com/16575/moneartist3/?



Fred said...

Joseph, seems that Aussie diplomat Alexander Downer (of the George Papadopoulos story) is part of a high level private company called Hakluyt staffed by former senior MI6 and NSA operatives: the Director of GCHQ, the Deputy Director for Cyber Defence Operations at GCHQ, the Deputy Director of the NSA and Nick Bidmead, who at one stage worked "as CEO of a Cambridge-based software company specializing in advanced fraud detection analytics."

The former NSA Deputy Director also ran a cyber security company called Darktrace with links to Cambridge University and UK intel groups.

Their International Advisory Board is unbelievably high level. And they are incredibly focused on cyber security.

>>> Hakluyt was caught out in 2001 funding a former German spy to infiltrate environmental groups in Europe allegedly on behalf of oil company clients and preparing analyses for an Australian mining group.

Most recently in 2012 it hit the headlines when one of its part-time investigators was murdered in a Chinese hotel room under mysterious circumstances involving a high-level Communist Party figure and claims of espionage.<<<

Trump fans are claiming these guys have been "fitting up" Trump over his Russia connections (ignore) but Hakluyt is still an incredibly interesting company. Cheers.

Alessandro Machi said...

Just because Trump says something, if it does not result in an immediate act, fogedaboudit. I stumbled upon the following excerpt that fortifies that position.

"Punishing speech because of later acts, Carney noted, also runs up against a venerable Civil Rights era precedent called NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware, in which Mississippi sought to punish a civil rights group because one of its leaders made “an impassioned speech, which was later followed by acts of violence.” Like the tort law at issue in Claiborne Hardware, he wrote, “the Anti-Riot Act criminalizes speech even if violence occurs weeks or months after the speech—or even if the violence never occurs.” Under a First Amendment doctrine called “substantial overbreadth,” a statute that can be used to penalize a good deal of “protected speech” is invalid in all its uses—even against speech (or acts) that could be punished under a properly drawn statute.

Anonymous said...

WTF?

"Jeffrey Epstein shipped a shredder from the U.S. Virgin Islands to his Palm Beach home in July 2008, shortly after reaching a non-prosecution agreement with then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, maritime records show. Then, in March of this year, shortly after a Florida federal judge invalidated that agreement, Epstein shipped a tile and carpet extractor from the Virgin Islands to his Manhattan townhouse, the records show."

https://theintercept.com/2019/07/09/jeffrey-epstein-sex-trafficking-shredder/

chum'sfriend

b said...

Stephen Hawking visited Little St James as Epstein's guest in 2006. He had a reputation for interest in young women, including club hostesses, although not in underage girls as far as I am aware.