Monday, February 17, 2014

Ayn and Sears

Salon has a new piece on Sears CEO Eddie Lampert, former Goldman honcho and noted acolyte of Ayn Rand. The argument: Rand-ism failed because Lampert has pretty much destroyed the company.
Lampert is now known as one of the worst CEOs in America — the man who flushed Sears down the toilet with his demented management style and harebrained approach to retail. Sears stock is tanking. His hedge fun is down 40 percent, and the business press has turned from praising Lampert’s genius towatching gleefully as his ship sinks. Investors are running from “Crazy Eddie” like the plague.

That’s what happens when Ayn Rand is the basis for your business plan.

Crazy Eddie has been one of America’s most vocal advocates of discredited free-market economics, so obsessed with Ayn Rand he could rattle off memorized passages of her novels. As Mina Kimes explained in a fascinating profile in Bloomberg Businessweek, Lampert took the myth that humans perform best when acting selfishly as gospel, pitting Sears company managers against each other in a kind of Lord of the Flies death match. This, he believed, would cause them to act rationally and boost performance.
As his company was descending into Randian mayhem, Lampert continued to cheerfully inform stockholders that his revolutionary ideas would soon produce earth-shattering results. Reality: Sears has lost half its value in five years. Since 2010, Sears has closed more than half of its stores. Sears Holdings is financially distressed and Lampert’s own hedge fund has reduced its stake in the company. The Sears store in Oakland, California, open for business with boarded-up windows, has even been cited for urban blight.
The counter-argument: Perhaps Eddie's craziness demonstrates the success of Randism. After all, a true disciple of Ayn cares only about Number 1. Has Eddie's personal bottom line suffered or profited from the gutting of Sears?

I'm not sure. But we do have this:
“Almost since the day he acquired control of Sears, he has been milking the company for cash as opposed to maximizing its performance as a retailer,” says Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners. “Its decline began way before Eddie Lampert, but look at the stuff he’s done. He hasn’t invested in stores, in marketing. He’s doing nothing to grow the business.”
True, Lambert says that he hasn't sold his personal shares. I don't think he was under oath when he made that statement, and I don't know how many shares he personally owns. He has been working for $1 a year. Instead, he got stock, taxed at a lower rate. And as noted, he controls the hedge fund.

It is not unheard-of for a CEO to short the stock of his own company. Check it out. I'm not saying Lampert did that. I'm just...exploring possibilities.

2 comments:

Alessandro Machi said...

I recently entered a contest to produce Sears Commercials. I made four entries, three of them I thought were really good and of the three, two of the three would have struck a chord with middle america.

Unfortunately there was only one prize in the category I entered and there were a couple of dozen entries.

What I find interesting in your article is the quote..."Lampert took the myth that humans perform best when acting selfishly as gospel, pitting Sears company managers against each other in a kind of Lord of the Flies death match. This, he believed, would cause them to act rationally and boost performance." End quote.

I stupidly thought if I doubled down and was able to promote two different divisions of the company within the same commercial, it would be viewed as a lot more bang for the buck.

But not if a company is being trained to eat its own.

seymourblogger said...

You and everyone else needs to start rethinking Ayn Rand. Rand is a fervent disciple of Nietzsche. Nietzsche advises that to get rid of something carry it to excess and it will implode.

Zizek formulates it differently as an "over identification" with the ideology adhered to.

Another way of looking at Rand is through the concept of the "unknown knowns" as IMO Rand knew, but didn't know she knew.

And in fact she has done what Francisco did, pull the whle thing down and expose that capitalism has no clothes on.

Ayn Rand has brought us to the "End of Capitalism" and although its ghost will be around for a long time, just like Nietzsche's "death of God" we owe her a great service for exposing it to us.

http://aynrand2.blogspot.com/2012/05/zizek-actuality-of-ayn-rand-journal-of.html