Why do Cantor, his press secretary, and Republicans everywhere deny what is plainly true? Because reality is terribly inconvenient: the GOP demi-god rejected the right-wing line on always opposing tax increases; he willingly compromised with Democrats on revenue; and the economy soared after Reagan raised taxes, disproving the Republican assumption that tax increases always push the nation towards recessions.It gets worse than that. The top tax rate was lowered as Reagan left office, which led to the recession that assailed Bush the elder. Clinton raised the top tax rate; not only did that move get our government out of the red (remember when the big issue was how to spend the surplus?), it initiated the longest period of prosperity we've known during the past five decades.
Here's another reality check: When you ask conservatives to defend the ludicrous notion that Obama is a socialist, they invariably will point to the stimulus package. But by far the largest item in that package was tax cuts.
If you say that the stim package did not work, you're saying that tax cuts don't work.
To make that admission is libertarian thoughtcrime. Many people prefer to rewrite history, to rewrite their own memories.
Libertarian theology is the constant triumph of hallucination over experience. Libertarians are stage magicians who keep thrusting their hands into an empty hat because their beloved theory -- which they can never allow themselves to question -- demands that a rabbit must be in there somewhere.
To be fair, though, this old-school libertarian was willing, back in 1987, to tell a few important truths about Reagan -- truths which modern conservatives like Cantor prefer to wish away.
Benen's article evinced a comment worth repeating, and even savoring.
I'm seeing the denial of reality in recent history, too. In response to the news that GM and Chrysler are planning to invest nearly $1BN in new plants and equipment in Ohio as the US auto industry rebounds, people are still trying to claim the bailout was a bad thing.
In particular, I'm hearing "if GM was such a good gamble, why didn't the private market loan them the money?" Which made me livid - these jack@sses have already forgotten that their precious markets were horribly, frighteningly broken lo those three years ago.
In all the "Obama is a Wall Street hating soshulist" garbage is one of the biggest real-time rewritings of history: the Kenyan communist saved capitalism's sorry butt. Big time.
But that cannot be the national narrative. Democrats must always be the party of government and Republicans the party of markets, even if the facts utterly support the opposite.
2 comments:
Or, both sides are full of BS and the way to heal main street is to let main street keep more of what they make by REDUCING interest rates on credit card debt and student loans for those who are PAYING down those debts, or COULD pay down those debts if the interest rates were lower.
This is THE NUMBER ONE ISSUE regarding debt, and NOBODY ever writes about it.
Alessandro, if the media wrote, or did a program on lowering the interest rates or reining in the big banks they would lose those viking commercials. No way are they going to bite the hand that feeds them. Those TV news anchors weren't swooning over Obama because he was the greatest thing since sliced bread, rather it was what Corporate America was putting in their wallets
Post a Comment