Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Did Israel support Hamas?

The following UPI story appeared on June 18, 2002. Make of it what you will:
Israel and Hamas may currently be locked in deadly combat, but, according to several current and former U.S. intelligence officials, beginning in the late 1970s, Tel Aviv gave direct and indirect financial aid to Hamas over a period of years.

Israel "aided Hamas directly -- the Israelis wanted to use it as a counterbalance to the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization)," said Tony Cordesman, Middle East analyst for the Center for Strategic Studies.

Israel's support for Hamas "was a direct attempt to divide and dilute support for a strong, secular PLO by using a competing religious alternative," said a former senior CIA official.
But with the triumph of the Khomeini revolution in Iran, with the birth of Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorism in Lebanon, Hamas began to gain in strength in Gaza and then in the West Bank, relying on terror to resist the Israeli occupation.

Israel was certainly funding the group at that time. One U.S. intelligence source who asked not to be named said that not only was Hamas being funded as a "counterweight" to the PLO, Israeli aid had another purpose: "To help identify and channel towards Israeli agents Hamas members who were dangerous terrorists."

In addition, by infiltrating Hamas, Israeli informers could only listen to debates on policy and identify Hamas members who "were dangerous hard-liners," the official said.

In the end, as Hamas set up a very comprehensive counterintelligence system, many collaborators with Israel were weeded out and shot. Violent acts of terrorism became the central tenet, and Hamas, unlike the PLO, was unwilling to compromise in any way with Israel, refusing to acquiesce in its very existence.

But even then, some in Israel saw some benefits to be had in trying to continue to give Hamas support: "The thinking on the part of some of the right-wing Israeli establishment was that Hamas and the others, if they gained control, would refuse to have any part of the peace process and would torpedo any agreements put in place," said a U.S. government official who asked not to be named.

"Israel would still be the only democracy in the region for the United States to deal with," he said.
By the way, the piece goes on to cite Vince Cannistraro and -- er -- Larry Johnson.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's not an issue in dispute. Of course, they did. They wittingly helped Hamas set up an extensive, hundred-plus building infrastructure (expediting permits, etc.).

XIslander

Anonymous said...

The Israeli's thought that Arafat wanted to make peace. Then he bailed, when the solution was offered of 2 states. Clinton was so close. The Nobel Prize was a freebie for Arafat, just to poke Israel with a stick.

Arafat would be so happy to read this blog, and know that he was right to refuse peace.

Anonymous said...

I have no problem believing that. US backed Bin laden in Afghanistan during the USSR occupation. US backed Saddam during the war with Iran....etc.
Israelis understand their Arab Brothers internal politics better than US ever has. Israel has practiced divide and conquer from the begining, with Egypt, Jordan and is secretley talking to Turkey now. Believe it or not, before the Iranian revolution, the Shah of Iran was the best ally of Israel in the region .

beeta

Anonymous said...

Short answer: yes, they did. Old news.

Blowback.

djmm