We don't need light bulbs, we just bask in the glow of Barack Obama.
Seriously, though at what point did you completely lose your sense of humor? As well as all perspective. You voted for Obama in the California primary at a time when you must have known most of what you don't like about him now. In other words it doesn't seem to me that you ever thought he was the Messiah and then became disillusioned. It would be difficult to make a case that he is any worse than Hillary Clinton (or Bill) or John McCain. He is certainly better than McCain on policy.
Obama is not as great as some of his more devoted followers may think, but not nearly as bad as you seem to think. Or so it seems to me.
Ah, the race card! But of course. We must now modify our joke:
"One does the screwing, while the other calls you a racist if you don't see the light."
gary: The comment about losing a sense of humor is very cute, coming as it does directly after that faked-up New Yorker cover "controversy."
No, I did not know what I should have known at the time of the primary.
Obi is not better than John McCain on policy, for one reason: Given BHO's well-established penchant for lying (and you know damn well you cannot defend him on that charge; he lies INCESSANTLY), you cannot trust him to follow any stated policy.
One: One to take credit for changing the lightbulb.
-or-
One to claim that they would have changed it the last time it burned out if they would have been charge of changing light bulbs at that time even though they have a track record of not changing this or any other light bulb.
-or-
Two. One to tell that they are opposed to changing the light bulb and promise to filibuster any attempt to replace the bulb and One to inexplicably change the lightbulb without further comment whether or not it has burned out.
-or-
It's a trick question, all of this talk of Change is smoke and mirrors and you're naive if you think the next light bulb is going to somehow be magically different from the last one.
-or-
(to follow up on a previous post) One to replace the light bulb with a CFL in a breathtakingly fast 10 years vs. the alternative who will replace it with another incandescent in an unbearably slow 7 years.
13 comments:
I have to say that yours sounds right on spot. Are all cults this focused and driven?
We don't need light bulbs, we just bask in the glow of Barack Obama.
Seriously, though at what point did you completely lose your sense of humor? As well as all perspective. You voted for Obama in the California primary at a time when you must have known most of what you don't like about him now. In other words it doesn't seem to me that you ever thought he was the Messiah and then became disillusioned. It would be difficult to make a case that he is any worse than Hillary Clinton (or Bill) or John McCain. He is certainly better than McCain on policy.
Obama is not as great as some of his more devoted followers may think, but not nearly as bad as you seem to think. Or so it seems to me.
Oh, and one more thing. He's going to win.
And it takes 3 anti-Obama bigots to speculate on where they might have stolen the bulb.
Ah, the race card! But of course. We must now modify our joke:
"One does the screwing, while the other calls you a racist if you don't see the light."
gary: The comment about losing a sense of humor is very cute, coming as it does directly after that faked-up New Yorker cover "controversy."
No, I did not know what I should have known at the time of the primary.
Obi is not better than John McCain on policy, for one reason: Given BHO's well-established penchant for lying (and you know damn well you cannot defend him on that charge; he lies INCESSANTLY), you cannot trust him to follow any stated policy.
701.
One who fumbles, peers and clumsily twists the object.
And 700 who cheer for change and hope.
Being as I am a proud Obotte, I don't screw in a lightbulb, I suck.
Belinda
One:
One to take credit for changing the lightbulb.
-or-
One to claim that they would have changed it the last time it burned out if they would have been charge of changing light bulbs at that time even though they have a track record of not changing this or any other light bulb.
-or-
Two.
One to tell that they are opposed to changing the light bulb and promise to filibuster any attempt to replace the bulb and One to inexplicably change the lightbulb without further comment whether or not it has burned out.
-or-
It's a trick question, all of this talk of Change is smoke and mirrors and you're naive if you think the next light bulb is going to somehow be magically different from the last one.
-or-
(to follow up on a previous post)
One to replace the light bulb with a CFL in a breathtakingly fast 10 years vs. the alternative who will replace it with another incandescent in an unbearably slow 7 years.
wow, a politician who lies !!! call keith !
Obama would be white and you would still be an anti-Obama bigot. You are the one playing the race card.
How many Obots does it take to change a lightbulb?
None. They just HOPE for change.
I hope that was copyright free - I just sent it to Donna Brazile and 200 of my closest friends.
Obamites don't screw in light bulbs.
They just stand around in the dark, blaming Hillary for it.
Hope you don't mind but I HAVE to repost this. It's hilarious.
Q: How many Obamabots does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A: You probably don't know because you are a racist, feminist, war-monger!
Post a Comment