Yeah, the comments on that post are pretty much inane drivel. I suppose democraticunderground is the freerepublic for the left.
That said, why has it taken so long for Congress to make any attempt to enforce its subpoenas? Why has Conyers, who was holding impeachment-like hearings in the House basement during the last Congress, refuse to investigate when he has the power to do so?
I have read any number of conspiracy theories about why the Democrats have failed to impeach, have failed to stop funding the war, have failed to end the ever-increasing attacks on our civil liberties by the Bush administration. I have yet to read a coherent explanation of their failure. Fear of the media or focus on winning back the presidency just don't hold up in my view. Have an alternate theory?
Sorry. Those two illiterate comments -- bravely anonymous, as always -- should have been deleted long ago. Alas, I had an important task.
Look, CDers and progs -- why do you even come here? I keep telling you: DIG OR SPLIT. I simply don't need you. I have zero interest in building up my readership stats. I'm not interested in dialog with people who have nothing new to say.
You have plenty of other places to infect. When will you get the message and GO?
ya know, the previous two comments really expose the rude, adolescent, and discourse-destroying attitude that joe continuously warns us about.
and is kind enough to protect us (and himself; good on ya!) from.
comments like those are not worthy of response, and i know i'll get slammed with their knuckle-dragging poop fest.
hell, bring it on. after this momentary suspension of ignoring them in order to point out to readers just what we're being spared, i'll happily return them to the cannonfire oblivion they deserve.
clearly they don't get what a real discussion is all about. clearly they failed kindergarten, and likely life in general.
too bad so sad for them.
and too bad so sad that joe must field all that infernal crap to keep this site civilized.
may i say here how grateful i am that he enforces this rule? sorta like having a sgt at arms who tries to keep things at the grown up level, right?
so where was our sgt at arms today when the childish repugs interrupted the US House memorial to tom lantos just so they could impose their infantile hissy-fit?
because i know the cretins will not get the connection, i just drew that parallel between you and the mean-spirited repug babies.
oh. just one more thing. need i remind these baboons intruding on our civilized conversation that joe is in the middle of tending to a very sick friend?
would it be too much to ask for you to show just a little bit of class?
apparently so.
go get 'em, joe. escort their sorry asses straight out the door. good riddance.
10 comments:
Yeah, the comments on that post are pretty much inane drivel. I suppose democraticunderground is the freerepublic for the left.
That said, why has it taken so long for Congress to make any attempt to enforce its subpoenas? Why has Conyers, who was holding impeachment-like hearings in the House basement during the last Congress, refuse to investigate when he has the power to do so?
I have read any number of conspiracy theories about why the Democrats have failed to impeach, have failed to stop funding the war, have failed to end the ever-increasing attacks on our civil liberties by the Bush administration. I have yet to read a coherent explanation of their failure. Fear of the media or focus on winning back the presidency just don't hold up in my view. Have an alternate theory?
Sorry. Those two illiterate comments -- bravely anonymous, as always -- should have been deleted long ago. Alas, I had an important task.
Look, CDers and progs -- why do you even come here? I keep telling you: DIG OR SPLIT. I simply don't need you. I have zero interest in building up my readership stats. I'm not interested in dialog with people who have nothing new to say.
You have plenty of other places to infect. When will you get the message and GO?
ya know, the previous two comments really expose the rude, adolescent, and discourse-destroying attitude that joe continuously warns us about.
and is kind enough to protect us (and himself; good on ya!) from.
comments like those are not worthy of response, and i know i'll get slammed with their knuckle-dragging poop fest.
hell, bring it on. after this momentary suspension of ignoring them in order to point out to readers just what we're being spared, i'll happily return them to the cannonfire oblivion they deserve.
clearly they don't get what a real discussion is all about. clearly they failed kindergarten, and likely life in general.
too bad so sad for them.
and too bad so sad that joe must field all that infernal crap to keep this site civilized.
may i say here how grateful i am that he enforces this rule? sorta like having a sgt at arms who tries to keep things at the grown up level, right?
so where was our sgt at arms today when the childish repugs interrupted the US House memorial to tom lantos just so they could impose their infantile hissy-fit?
because i know the cretins will not get the connection, i just drew that parallel between you and the mean-spirited repug babies.
oh. just one more thing. need i remind these baboons intruding on our civilized conversation that joe is in the middle of tending to a very sick friend?
would it be too much to ask for you to show just a little bit of class?
apparently so.
go get 'em, joe. escort their sorry asses straight out the door. good riddance.
Where's yr sense of humor Joe? Queeg's comment was the funniest I've read in weeks, and you trashed it.
Post a Comment