Sunday, November 12, 2006

Lib-rule

The hard copy version of this Los Angeles Times story has an unwelcome sub-head. The headline reads "Liberal groups expect postelection results," and the sub-head (as seen on newsracks) reads: "Abortion, gun control."

Excuse me?

I've been following progressive web sites fairly closely -- some would even say that I run one -- and neither abortion nor gun control has topped the agenda. We've been fighting for Bush control. We want the abortion of fascism in its fetal stage. We seek the return of search warrants, the Geneva Convention, habeus corpus, and privacy rights. We want an end to torture. We want punishment for officials who lie us into war. We want an end to massive borrowing from Asians and Arabs. We want our country to make things again.

Once again, the mainstream media has conjured up a "boogeyman" image of liberalism which buttresses dangerous and misleading stereotypes.

Nancy Pelosi's emergence forces us to confront a particularly pernicious stereotype, one which deserves the earliest possible death: The belief that San Francisco has become a game preserve for gays, socialists, hedonists and ne'er-say-die hippies. Many Americans who have never visited the Bay area think they know what goes on there.

Of course there are lots of gay people in SF, although most residents are hetero, as in every other city. Aficionados of hedonism will indeed find some nasty strip clubs in the Tenderloin district -- almost as nasty as the ones in Jeb Bush's Florida. (Or so I am told by those with expert knowledge of such matters.)

But...hippies? Commies? Do they really run the joint, as popular imagination would have it?

In a word: No.

When I was younger, friends of mine moved to that area because Beat literature and old Robert Crumb comics had conjured up the delusion that the Summer of Love still held sway in Golden Gate Park. Man, were they surprised.

Upon his return, one friend said that he could sum up San Francisco in one word: Capitalism.

For some reason, tourists hopping from Chinatown to Fisherman's Wharf mentally block out the office buildings. They don't quite understand that people work in those buildings -- 50-plus hours a week. Rents in that area are sky-high, and there's always some other guy who wants the job.

Life in Los Angeles tends to be rather more easygoing. In San Francisco, it's always the Summer of Long Hours. People wear ties, not tie-dye.

Both San Franciscans and Los Angelenos (and this is a point I never tire of repeating) are producers. They give much more to the Federal treasury than they receive. Folks in Alabama and Mississippi and Texas are leeches. They drain much more from the federal government than they contribute.

Yet those same southerners have the sheer gall to accuse their funders -- Nancy Pelosi's constituents -- of being socialistic suckers of the guv-a-mint teat.

My southern friends, it's time you understood that you owe your pork to some hard-working Californians. Think about that next time you carp about Nancy Pelosi's alleged "San Francisco values." Moochers don't have the right to carp about their benefactors.

8 comments:

DrewL said...

Okay, okay. We get the point. But just because Texas may be a red state (sadly), don't forget that there are many of us progressives here in Texas, too. Believe me, I get plenty sick and tired of seeing all of those W04 stickers on the backs of the gas-guzzling SUVs and pickup trucks all around the DFW area.

The good news is that Dallas County had a watershed election year for progressives last week, with Democrat judicial candidates winning just about every race - 42 in all. Dallas also elected its first black District Attorney, Craig Watkins, a Democrat. In 2004 Dallas County elected an Hispanic lesbian - Lupe Valdez - as Dallas County Sheriff.

Don't get me wrong, there's a long way to go to turn red into blue down here, but progress is being made. And I'll do my best to make sure it continues!

Anonymous said...

Hey, DrewL. If it makes you feel any better, I feel for you progressives stuck in red state hell, even though I have seen the inherently reactionary element to most states-gone-red turn out some awesome liberals. My favorite Democrats in the world are either Georgia Dems, or Texas Dems. You're never going to hear those folks bitching about leaving the Democratic Party, that's for sure. Continued best of luck trying to get through to your neighbors.

Anonymous said...

Only slightly OT, I just found out today that here in Oregon the Dems in the state House picked up four or five seats and for the first time since 1989 the Dems control the Senate, House, and Governor's office. Any more details on this, Jen? I don't follow state politics very much, but maybe you do.

Anonymous said...

Holy crap, unirealist, you're in Oregon with me? I didn't realize that. Or, maybe I did and forgot. I was a little busy these last couple of months. I do follow state politics as much as I can, but I'll admit that our victories in the state house went right by me. I'll have to go look that up. Ted and Darlene kept their seats, which, I confess, was pretty much all I cared about, so after they'd secured their re-elections I went to bed. I wonder if that means Karen Mennis is out. Hmmmm.

Anonymous said...

Not that you should let facts get in the way of your argument, but based on the latest data available, Texas is a net contributor to the Federal treasury. And I guess, based on your nomenclature, you'd have to include Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont, in to the leacher category.

Joseph Cannon said...

Where's your data, anon? The Texas thing deserves a cite. And if your argument comes down to "Texas stopped picking your pocket last year, for the first time in twenty years, so they now have a right to say snooty and smug things about Californians and New Yorkers" -- well, that's no argument at all.

Anonymous said...

http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/347.html

http://thelowestdeep.blogspot.com/2004/11/federal-spending-per-tax-dollar-by.html

http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/07/political_bacon.html

Anonymous said...

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:ZmW9zKfxY8QJ:psweb.sbs.ohio-state.edu/faculty/hweisberg/conference/Lacy-OSUConf.PDF+Federal+Spending+Received+Per+Dollar+of+Taxes+Paid+by+State&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=8