Over at Awful Forums, a regular poster code-named Martin Random -- who claims to have a job inside the White House -- has spilled many an alleged secret about the people running the country. Mostly he relays humiliating dirt concerning personal habits and eccentricities.
His initial posts offered some revelations that seemed, on first whiff, quite over-the-top and difficult to believe. I have no problem accepting the claim that the president is hooked on anti-depressants, and I see no reason to doubt that Dick Cheney is an annoyingly "close talker" (that is, he leans in very close to anyone he addresses, pinning his poor targets against the wall). I also do not doubt that Cheney farts a lot.
But the stuff about Donald Rumsfeld -- well, you have to read it to believe it. Tom Ridge comes off even worse.
Should we give any credit to these tales? At first, I dismissed them. But as I kept reading, a few bits began to ring true. Especially the stuff about semi-legal "insider" trading: Apparently, pols and their aides make their real money trading on stocks that they know will be affected by current legislation.
But then again...the Rumsfeld thing... Man. I just don't know. I thought that guys with poor circulation in their calves were more likely to have E.D. problems...
By the way, one of the contirbutors to that thread says that he got to know Barbara Bush, the daughter. When asked if she or anyone else in the family was particularly religious, she answered "Not really."
I find that believable.
Read. Do not necessarily believe. Try to spot "tells" indicating fakery. I guarantee one thing: You will not be bored. This is political porn of the highest order.
(Oh yeah: He says Condi Rice smells good. Real good. "Random" is obsessive on the subject. Maybe that's why Rumsfeld is the way he is...)
5 comments:
The "insider trading" accusation isn't unfounded. Our Elected Leaders somehow manage to make far more in the stock market (on percentage growth basis) than 7 figure salary money managers (not to mention "ordinary" investors). This is a matter of public record.
As for the stuff on Rumsfeld -- well, it's not inconceivable, but how important is it? Nothing could more damning or ludicrous than the record of his public proclamations, and the disastrous results of his policies, and about those we have no doubt at all.
It is BS.
He mentions Rummy's "Secret Service detail."
Rummy's protective detail is DOD.
Well, to be fair, he DOES offer an explanation of sorts for that later on. Not that this necessarily makes things more credible. But it's definitely entertaining stuff, and he does make "suspension of disbelief" easier the more you read.
re: Condi
Synthetic pheromones? Likely.
"Smell good?" Give me a break.
The longer I read the less credible it became. It was an entertaining read, but it had several holes.
First he starts off with his white-house White-house thing, someone asks him why he hyphenates it and he says because every computer "where he works" has a macro for white-house so he never has to type it. SO I guess they have a macro for it with both an upper and lower case W.
He then says he never browses personal websites at work because it's watched very closely. Then he says he has posted enough and he has to try to get some work done.
True or not it's entertaining, that's for sure.
Post a Comment