The D.C. rumor mill is thrumming with whispers that 22 indictments are about to be handed down on the outed-CIA agent Valerie Plame case. The last time the wires buzzed this loud — that Tom DeLay would be indicted and would step down from his leadership post in the House — the scuttlebutters got it right.(Radar's photo of Rove shows him making the "W" symbol with his fingers. I guess the straight-arm salute would have been a little too obvious.)
Can it be a coincidence that the White House appears to be distancing President Bush from embattled aide Karl Rove? "He's been missing in action at more than one major presidential event," a member of the White House press corps tells us.
Another rumor holds that Rove has already received a "target letter," which is a warning that you're about to be hit with an indictment.
The Washington Post reports that Fitzgerald will announce very soon whether or not he intends to bring indictments. Other sources believe that Fitzgerald will bring conspiracy charges. This information comes, apparently, from defense lawyers in the case. (It's worth noting that Rove's lawyer no longer denies that Rove is a target of investigation.) From a piece by Jim VenderHei and Walter Pincus:
Many lawyers in the case have been skeptical that Fitzgerald has the evidence to prove a violation of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, which is the complicated crime he first set out to investigate, and which requires showing that government officials knew an operative had covert status and intentionally leaked the operative's identity.Could such a conspiracy involve as many as 22 administration officials? Think Progress had earlier compiled a list of 21 administration officials involved with the scandal: Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, Condoleezza Rice, Stephen Hadley, Andrew Card, Alberto Gonzales, Mary Matalin, Ari Fleischer, Susan Ralston, Israel Hernandez John Hannah, Scott McClellan, Dan Bartlett, Claire Buchan, Catherine Martin, Colin Powell, Karen Hughes, Adam Levine, Bob Joseph, Cheney and Bush.
But a new theory about Fitzgerald's aim has emerged in recent weeks from two lawyers who have had extensive conversations with the prosecutor while representing witnesses in the case. They surmise that Fitzgerald is considering whether he can bring charges of a criminal conspiracy perpetrated by a group of senior Bush administration officials. Under this legal tactic, Fitzgerald would attempt to establish that at least two or more officials agreed to take affirmative steps to discredit and retaliate against Wilson and leak sensitive government information about his wife. To prove a criminal conspiracy, the actions need not have been criminal, but conspirators must have had a criminal purpose.
As most of you know, just a few days ago George Stephanopolis intrigued many when he muttered word from a unnamed source that the probe would result in indictments of Dick and Dubya. A close parsing of the Miller case offers indications that she was protecting someone above Scooter. So who's higher? Well, there's the Man in Charge. And then there's W.
Who, according to report, has been pretty damn high lately.
4 comments:
If I was a betting man, I'd be shorting the stock market right now. If Fitz actually issues 22 criminal indictments against the administration, the equity markets are going to tank like you've never seen in this lifetime.
I bet the market heaves a sigh of relief.
It's too good to be true. People who rise to positions of power in this country, including Republican prosecutors like Patrick Fitzergerald, know full well where justice begins and ends, which is long before the top.
The case would have to be overwhelming for a presidential indictment, and with public clamor for same. The conspiracy theory suggested by the WP doesn't begin to meet that standard.
Rove and Libby may well fall. That's their function. Note however that Bush I effectively pardoned himself in Iran-Contra, by issuing blanket pardons *before* the cases to trial and facts inconvenient to him (Bush) emerged.
Why would Bush, Jr. be any different? We'll be told Rove & Libby are "patriots" and "fine public servants", all victims of over-zealous prosecution.
Is the White House gang planning another attack in New York , as a distraction from coming developments in Rove-Plame-gate?
Or perhaps threatening such an attack, in an attempt to forestall certain developments?
NYPD are talking of an imminent 'credible threat' of '19 suitcase bombs'.
19? What's with the quoting of such an exact non-round number?
When you hear of a 'big drill', stay away. Does the current police operation count? You decide... Me, I'd stay away.
Agreed about the stock market. Sell futures now. But I'd probably say that anyway. The Dow is high and, hey, we're in October...
Post a Comment