Pursuant to my research into an odd (very odd) bit of Nixon-era skullduggery, I have been looking into the life and works of an author named Robin Moore, best known for his classic book about the Green Berets.
At age 80, Moore is still writing about military and national security issues. Two years ago, he came out with a book titled The Hunt for Bin Laden: Task Force Dagger On the ground with the Special Forces in Afghanistan. In this work, Moore complains about the CIA's activities in Afghanistan. (Oddly enough, I've heard rumors that Moore himself has had linkages to the American intelligence establishment.) An online review of the book includes a passage worthy of wider attention:
Moore’s treatment of the CIA is nothing short of scathing. He essentially calls them wimps, and harshly criticizes the conduct of "Dave", the CIA officer who worked with Mike Spann, the Agency operative who died in an uprising of Taliban and al Qaeda prisoners. Moore reveals details about the riot and Spann's death that were kept secret at the time. He also reveals that Spann's widow, Shannon, was herself a CIA officer, and that the two had met in 1999 while attending a Clandestine Service Officer’s training course. Whatever Moore's opinion of the Agency, that last revelation, if true, seems unnecessary and irresponsible.Irresponsible indeed! One cannot read these words without thinking of the name "Valerie Plame."
Plame, of course, was "outed" as a CIA operative by columnist Robert Novak in an exactly similar fashion. The outing of Shannon Spann may be even more troubling since she appears to have functioned as a covert agent overseas.
Which brings us to the obvious question: Why do some writers find themselves able to swim freely through waters that most of us would find scalding hot?
Robin Moore, with his lifelong ties to this nation's special forces, will not see the inside of a jail or a courtroom -- and not just because the Justice Department does not wish to bring charges against an octogenarian with Parkinson's disease. If you or I (at any age) had revealed the identity of a serving undercover CIA officer, we might well have to explain our actions to a prosecutor.
Robert Novak, who has lived by way of the leak since the Watergate era, also seems to possess a "Get out of jail free" card. Yet he faces no charges in the Plame affair.
Nevertheless, the Supreme Court recently ruled that the hapless Judith Miller of the New York Times and Matt Cooper of Time magazine face jail for refusing to disclose their sources on the Plame story. Neither Miller nor Cooper revealed Plame's identity in the first place; Novak did. Miller did not even write about the issue. She simply spoke to a source -- who may or may not have been credible -- while attempting to do research.
The obvious questions:
1. What did Robert Novak and Robin Moore do to merit immunity?
2. Few now deny that a "war" has existed between CIA and the neocon movement. Were the revelations by Moore and Novak intended as skirmishes in that war?
4 comments:
It's possible Novak pleaded the fifth. Since he could be liable to criminal prosecution for outing Plame (unlike Miller), this legal strategy is probably available to him.
Or he might have "cooperated". He has no principles, so that wouldn't be surprising.
As for Miller -- it's a pity she's going to jail for what she didn't report, instead of for being Ahmad Chalabi's Minister of Disinformation. This was the woman who (on the front page of the NYT) cited "a man in a hat", seen at distance of 100 yards, as a source of information about chemical weapons in Iraq.
I believe that Robin Moore was the co-author of a book "LBJ and the JFK Conspiracy" by Hugh McDonald and Robin Moore, a "novel" implicating the KGB in the Kennedy assassination. McDonald also wrote a book "Appointment in Dallas",describing how he tracked down and interviewed the assassin. It is widely believed to be disinformation.CIA document #104-10124-10103 refers to a request for a QKENCHANTT clearance for Hugh Chisholm McDonald. The memo is dated 8/3/76, after that book came out. This memo states:
"Office of Security records do not support Mr. McDonald's claims to
Agency employment or involvement in clandestine operations. From 1955 to circa 1961 Mr. McDonald, as an independent contractor, assisted Technical Service Division/AuthenticationDivision/DDPin the development of the Identikit.." In May 1969 McDonald formed World Associates, Inc. The memo states:
"In June 1969 Central Cover Staff evidenced interest in Mr. McDonald
under Project QKENCHANT."
Gary Buell
The fact that Shannon Spann met her husband while both were employed by CIA was reported in the Washington Post at the time of his killing.
Rarely have I been so grateful to commentators as I am today.
The information about Shannon Spann is news to me -- I don't recall seeing this data nugget during the initial reporting of the death of Mike Spann -- but I will presume that the anonymous reader is accurate here.
The Hugh MacDonald book was known to me -- jeez, did I once own a copy? -- but the Moore connection was something I had forgotten. A little web-searching reveals this odd factoid, from a review of "Passport to Assassination," by former KGB Colonel Nechiporenko (whom I happened to meet briefly, during the book's release):
"...the author reveals the mind set of KGB and Western intelligence and counterintelligence agencies: To his surprise, he says, he found himself named in two American books-- KGB (1974), by John Barron, and L.B.J. and the J.F.K. Conspiracy (1978), by Hugh MacDonald and Robin Moore--as Oswald's KGB ``manager'' in Mexico City. Nechiporenko contends that both books were drawn in part from information supplied by Western intelligence agencies..."
So that is the reason why rumor holds that Moore is, as they say, "spooky."
And why is his spookiness importance? My friends, therein lieth one HELL of a tale which I hope to tell soon. For now, I will direct the curious to Anthony Summers' superb Nixon bio, "Arrogance of Power." Ponder the footnotes.
Thanks again...
Post a Comment