We all know it's coming. The only question is: Will we believe the administration when it tells us to blame Iran -- the invasion of which (according to Scott Ritter and others) is scheduled for June?
I note that the CIA will soon conduct a three-day "cyber-terrorism" exercise called "Silent Horizon." This odd factoid reminds me of the under-appreciated "Vigilant Guardian" exercise NORAD conducted at the time of the World Trade Center attacks.
Basically, Vigilant Guardian was intended to simulate that which Al Qaeda did for real. On the same day. Pure coincidence, of course.
If I may be allowed to indulge in a bit of grim humor: Toward the finale of the wonderful new Star Wars films (my favorite of an erratic series), the evil Palpatine initiates the Jedi massacre by calling for "Order 66." Wouldn't it be ironic if the new 9/11 occurs on 6/6?
Of course, scheduling the event for 6/6 of next year would send our ever-predictable fundamentalists into ecstasy...
13 comments:
hey. what if the target of the new 9/11 (or new new pearl harbor) is the net.
what if, instead of a dirty bomb of a spray of bio-war they just claim the net has been attacked and they stop THE biggest thorn in their side?
their base will have its segment of complainers, but they'll all get behind the little prince as he trots us all off to another invasion, likely iran of course.
and since they have the remainder of the media licking their boots already, it will simply be all propaganda all the time.
no smoke, no dead bodies, just a lot of economic problems that they'd have had with the smoke and bodies anyway.
oh. i forgot. they like all that, the smoke and the bodies.
Keep on saying it for long enough and it will certainly come true. :)
FWIW,
June 7, 2005 is the 38th anniversary of the beginning of the Six-Day War.
Joseph,
What do you think about reports that our own gov/military conducted 9/11, that those planes were privately owned and equipped with missiles that hit the WTC and the pentagon? Most likely the actual hijacked planes were blown to smitherines by our military.
Do you think that the military exercise going on 9/11 had anything to do with setting up this self-inflicted attack so then Bush and Co could get the Patriot act passed and then start waging war against Afghanistan and then Iraq?
just wondering. I've seen some video clips of the plane that hit the South Tower and you can't see any United airlines logo on the side. The first plane also wasn't identified as a commercial jetliner.
your thoughts?
Interesting thoughts about missiles and non-commercial airlines, but how do you account for the collection of body parts at the sites? Trucked in from the actual crash site after our military shot down the planes? It would surely be the mother of all cover-ups. As for missiles hitting the WTC, hard to tell. I remember seeing footage from 2 vantage points of the 2nd plane hitting. One was from a rooftop, and the other was from the ground looking up at the tower (from a production crew that just happened to be in town filming a documentary on one of the fire deptartments). I don't recall seeing any "pre-explosion" right before the plane's impact.
My own personal belief is that 9/11 gave Bush & Co. the opportunity to go into Iraq. We have evidence that the discussions started soon after Bush got into office. I do think they knew 9/11 was coming, but I am not so convinced how involved Bush himself was. I think it was more Rove/Cheney/Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld's doings than anything else. Think about it: if Iraq was an imminent threat in 2002, then at the very least they were surely a gathering threat in 2000. We also had the previous attacks on the WTC and the U.S.S. Cole, each with Al Qaeda written all over them. Remember that during one of the debates, Bush said that the U.S. did not need to be the policemen of the world. Suppose instead that he said "Iraq has WMDs and is a threat to the U.S., both at home and abroad, and if I am elected President we will take him out and secure the safety of America and the world." He would never have been elected. They had to let 9/11, or something of that magnitude, happen, to justify the invasion of Iraq. Now, whether or not we invaded Iraq to avenge Bush Sr., one thing's for sure: it all but guaranteed his re-election.
I was thinking the same thing about these 2 "war game" excercises! Wierd. At first I thought to myself "naww...I'm just being paranoid...".
But now that you mentioned it too, kind of creeps me out. I wonder if the "new 9/11" will be some sort of cyber attack on the power grid, or a nuclear powerstation. I think that's what they are war gaming - and just like on the real 9/11, they'll say it was just a strange coincedence.
Those United Airlines and American Airlines planes could have been forced down and the passengers then reloaded onto private planes and then later destroyed. Bombs/missiles were supposedly strapped underneath the planes.
Why didn't the gov ever release any footage of a commercial jetliner hitting the Pentagon? that's what gets me. The Pentagon is the most protected and filmed building in the world and no film was released. The FBI/gov men actually confiscated the film out of a gas station's survelliance camera that may have caught the object flying into the Pentagon. From the looks of the hole left in the Pentagon, it does look like a cruise missile caused that destruction.
There have been reports about some of the lead Egyptian/Saudi hijackers eating/drinking whatever they wanted.
Knowing about the military practice exercise on 9/11 does make one wonder.
The Pentagon was damaged not by a cruise missile but by a new type of tank that was secretly developed. It was called Project Pentashoot. It is fronted by a photography supplies company called Pentaxshoot. The CEO is none other than Joe Namath, the former quarterback. This has been going on for the last twenty years. And the Trade Centre was felled by alien spacecraft, projecting images of crashing aircraft. It was very sophisticated.
There has been a lot of talk about another event happening very soon. I have read this theory at a few places and even heard some radio people talking about it, mostly as pure conjecture.. So what happens if this event actually happens.. Are these people just good guessers..
There have always been a few things about 9/11 that have always bothered me.. How did Mohammed Atta so easily move in and out of the country and travel on test runs when he is on a terrorist watchlist..
Why did the FBI and judges work so hard against Colleen Rowley so she could not get access to Mossauis laptop computer..
The last item was when they tracked down Mohammed Atta's father he made a statement that chilled me.. When shown a photo of his son, he said "that is not my son". The reporter took that as his son would never do such a terrible act.. I took it as the photo shown to him was not "mohammed atta". So who was Mohammed Atta actually working for? The Saudi's or the CIA?
Wikipedia's page on the war games.
The weirdest one is the NRO exercise on September 11th, in which a small corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure.
Re body parts: how many were actually identified? (I don't know the answer, but if body parts are what you need, they can be gotten in various ways, and don't have to be the genuine ones.)
Even if the actual aircraft (as stated) were used, it could still be a dummy operation carried out by elements of our government, or Saudi's, or Israel's, or someone's. Indeed it has always seemed to me that the "Arab hijackers" story could be at least partly true, but that they were probably CIA-recruited or in some other way brought in to serve a purpose, probably thinking they were genuinely carrying out a fanatic attack (but all the while unaware they were doing it for covert US intelligence masters---only their own leader needed to know anything at all)...it all plays together neatly enough.
Re the military exercises: this is the one means whereby the plotters behind Bush could most easily involve thousands of people in their treason without clueing in more than half a dozen. War games are the ideal foundation for coup activity! Everybody believes what he's doing is genuine, and only that last-minute twist turns it into a terror attack.
If you tried it in any other way you'd have at least hundreds of knowing co-conspirators and associated leaks. This way your tightly-knit cadre of Bush loyalists who actually run the operation can control precisely both the secrecy and the finesse, and all the rest of the participants believe it's just a war game.
Wouldn't this mean, then, that the real purpose of the coming wargame would need to be close to the stated purpose---power grid or whatever?
On the other hand I strongly believe the net either has to be an associated target, or else they will take command of the net immediately afterwards on grounds of national security...taking down the power grid, of course, takes down the net.
One way or another I believe they cannot afford to allow the net to remain free after another attack. Which cuts us off from one another and effectively destroys the information underground. Do we have any fallback? I don't think so. Once off the net, we are effectively neutralized, dispersed, out of contact, and without effective means of even token retaliation.
I hope I'm wrong about all of this, but sad to say, such a scenario seems increasingly likely. Should we be preplanning now, and if so how?
I'd recommend checking:
fromthewilderness.com
and then read Mike Ruppert's eye-popping book " Crossing the Rubicon".
You all get an insight what happened and why on September 11, 2001.
Hey Blogger, I am conducting some research on various Web Detective sites and ran across this page. Even though it wasn't "exactly" what I was searching for, I think the readers of "The next 9/11" still might be interested in reading our review of Web Detective sites and other similar websites. As you know, the more information people have before spending their hard earned money, the better. Sorry for the self-promotion, just trying to get the word out while looking for more sites to review. On to the next -- Thanks!
Post a Comment