If you head to www.blackboxvoting.org, you'll discover that Bev Harris has laid into the Clint Curtis story, which she dismisses as disinformation. I have not yet had time to process her accusations, or to hear the other side of the story. At this point, I ask readers to read her bill of particulars and come to their own conclusions. Provisional conclusions.
I do think Harris is wrong about Madsen. She scores him for not writing "tight." Hell, if every investigative writer in progressive circles were punished for THAT particular sin, none would 'scape whipping.
2 comments:
You mention Bev Harris, but you neglect to mention that pillar of Progressive rectitude Keith Olbermann, who disses the Curtis story out of hand. My poll question is this:
All who think K.O. might be a smoke-and-mirrors media double-agent, raise your hands. He is as consistently dismissive of everything he "honestly" reports as he is suspect. After all, look at the program which precedes his...
His program would be a wonderful double-teaming ploy on the part of those who wish to confound truth-seekers by sucking them in.
Harken, ye seekers after honesty. Packaging isn't always honest.
Please see The BRAD BLOG response to Bev Harris and the Clint Curtis, Wayne Masden issues...
http://bradblogtoo.blogspot.com/2004/12/response-to-bev-harris-questions-on.html
Brad
THE BRAD BLOG
NOW OVER FLOWING AT:
http://BradBlogTOO.blogspot.com
Post a Comment