There's a new
semi-official explanation for Bush's back bulge. (Scroll down.) It is now admitted to be real -- proving Bush a liar. Apparently, he really
was fearful that those Jewish youngsters at the Menorah-lighting ceremony were going to gun him down...
5 comments:
MUST follow up on this. Why did the NYT kill the story before the election? Why not a simple secret service note about a bullet proof vest at the beginning of this story? What about the audiotapes in France? The Bush group must be held accountable.
!!- An electric voting machine in Ohio gives President Bush 0ver 3400 extra votes (this just reported on CNN's inside politices, Nov. 5th)... thats like 2% of the votes by itself!!!
!!- Some voters using e-voting machines not properly calibarated found that their votes for Kerry were defaulted for Bush. In fact, all their choices were opposite of their choices.
!!- Numerous voting "anomalies" have been reported.
We don't know if there is a conspiracy of voter fraud or not. I'd like to think not (perhaps wishful thinking). But lets try to be less conspiratorial here and focus on facts and numbers, it'll help the arguement.
Here's a couple questions, if we had the facts on these questions, maybe it would shed some light on what happened.
?- When machines were not calibrated properly, was the default always favoring Bush?
?- If yes, how many possible votes were cast incorrectly? In what voting districts? Democrat or Republican districts?
?- Who set this default choice? Who made/serviced the machines?
?- Are there reports of other machines giving out large or small "extra" votes for Bush? Did Kerry get any "extra" votes, or was it always Bush?
- The CEO of Diebold who manufactures e-voting machines stated publicly that he would do whatever is necessary to make sure Bush got the votes he needed in his state (Ohio, of course). Having such a partisan Bush supporter making voting machines makes me uneasy, but proves nothing in itself. (I'll try to dig up this link and post it later)
?- Can anyone find data on the default choices set for Diebold machines?
?- Was there any difference between the number of votes for Bush made on Diebold machines versus other e-voting machines? Do the numbers match other statistical data?
?- How many default votes per machine could result in a victory for bush in Ohio? Other states?
?- Could this be the reason why exit poll data does not mach the vote numbers?
Just some thoughts...
Just what exactly do they mean when they say the e-voting machines need to be "calibrated"?
LamontCranston
Oh, come on! That was a BOX, not a strap! Of course he was wearing a transmitter-receiver. The bullet-proof vest theory was ruled out long ago - it would have been fastened on the sides, not on one side of the back with a wire leading up to the shoulder.
You should be a little smarter by now - the Bushies lie lie and lie again. Semi-official explanation? I can´t believe that you swallow that stuff.
There's also the teensy problem with the bulletproof vest idea that people who know about them have said that there's no vest that would have appeared that way under a suit jacket.
Post a Comment