Image and video hosting by TinyPic














Friday, September 09, 2016

AGAIN with the "birther" BS!

It seems that Chris Matthews had a newsworthy spat with Rudy Giuliani yesterday. I caught a bit of it as it happened -- to be specific, I heard the argument over Donald Trump's embrace of birtherism (and Mike Pence's denial of same).
MATTHEWS: When did he — he has now accepted that birtherism was nonsense, when did he do that?

GIULIANI: Look, Hillary Clinton’s campaign — Chris, Hillary Clinton’s campaign …

MATTHEWS: He did not do that yet. I am waiting for him to do it.

GIULIANI: Hillary Clinton’s campaign was the first one to bring up the fact that there was a question …

MATTHEWS: Where did they do that? Where did they do that?

GIULIANI: Donald Trump has said that three, four, five years ago.

MATTHEWS: Give me the example of when they did that. You just said that Hillary Clinton accused the president — has Hillary Clinton ever accused the president of being foreign-born, ever?

GIULIANI: Her campaign did during the primary.

MATTHEWS: Her campaign, the Hillary for president campaign did this?

GIULIANI: Yes.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: No, it didn’t. There's no evidence the Hillary campaign ...

GIULIANI: I was always responsible for everything in my campaign.
Apparently, this is the go-to GOP response whenever someone brings up Donald Trump's embrace of birtherism: "Hillary started it."

No she did not. She had nothing to do with it.

I should know: I was involved (in my own weird way) with the PUMA movement back in 2008. Back then, I was pretty plugged in to what was going on. Although quite a few websites have tried to relate how the birther myth started, my humble blog has been one of the few places where you will find the parts of the story which most journalists leave out.

Various fact-checking websites (like this one) have asserted that birtherism began with an anonymous "chain email" which made the rounds in April of 2008. I don't know anyone who actually received this email at that time; if it ever popped into my inbox, the spam filter must have caught it. That email certainly had no link to the official Clinton campaign.

Not even Rudy Giuliani can claim that Hillary should take responsibility for an anonymous email.

Bottom line: Back in 2008, that bit of anonymously-emailed April Fooling was IT. There was no more birtherism heard throughout the land for the rest of Hillary's campaign. She endorsed Obama in June.

The dates prove the point beyond rational debate: Birtherism did NOT begin with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- period.

The "Obama was not born in Hawaii" myth was not heard again until August, when there was a flurry of activity. Again, let us be clear: There was no Clinton campaign in August. Got that, Rudy?

(I have a personal theory about that original April email. I think that it was a typical Roger Stonian trick, similar to the current fake story that Donald Trump raped a teenaged girl provided by Jeffrey Epstein -- a ridiculous claim discussed in previous posts. We should return to that topic one of these days, since there have been developments: Roger Stone and his writing partner Robert Morrow have staged a bogus spat over this allegation, which Morrow pretends to accept at face value. Apparently, Morrow and Stone hope to sucker liberals into pursuing a red herring. I don't know who these guys think they're fooling.)

Birtherism began in earnest in August of 2008. The question has arisen: Were the first birthers die-hard former supporters of Hillary Clinton? In other words, were they PUMAs?

(Let's say it yet again: Hillary conceded in June and was campaigning for Obama in August.)

Back in October of 2014, I wrote a post which discussed the events of that time period in great detail; perhaps it would be as well to reprint that earlier piece. Everything below the asterisks comes from 2014.

* * *

Earlier today, during a Barnes and Noble run, I flipped through a book called Wingnuts, by John Avlon -- a work which carries an endorsement from no less a personage than Bill Clinton. Although the book came out a few years ago, I did not get a chance to skim through those pages until tonight. It's a not-bad compendium of the nuttier right-wing attacks on Barack Obama.

Alas, Avlon gets his history wrong when he talks about the origin of "birther" madness. Worse, his blunder was picked up by the Daily Beast.

Avlon claims that birtherism was originally a liberal "thing." Specifically: Wingnuts argues that birth certificate paranoia originated with the PUMA movement. In case you came in late, PUMA is an acronym for Party Unity My Ass, a movement comprised of people who refused to give up on Hillary Clinton during the 2008 campaign. I was loosely affiliated with PUMA.

To claim that this movement gave birth to birtherism is wrong and arguably slanderous.

PUMA began on The Confluence, a pro-Hillary site set up by Riverdaughter, a feisty and extremely talented former Daily Kos blogger. She was exiled from Markos Moulitsas' mega-site because she refused to clamber aboard the Obama bandwagon. Her site was the first to publish the acronym and the first to shape that acronym into a movement. Throughout 2008, The Confluence was PUMA Central.

It's important to understand one key fact: Not long after The Confluence got PUMA going, Republican operatives -- sensing an opportunity -- set up a number of fake PUMA sites. These sites pretended to be the work of liberals disenchanted with Obama, although these wolves-in-sheep's-clothing were rarely very persuasive. No matter how stridently they tried to baaa, they emitted a distinctive lupine odor.

Perhaps the most influential pseudo-PUMA site was No Quarter, the brainchild of former CIA guy Larry Johnson. He was the cleverest of the bunch -- which isn't surprising, given the man's background. Johnson had me fooled for a while, although I eventually saw through him.

Another suspected "wolf in sheep's clothing" site (at least in my opinion) was PUMAParty.org, which published some of the earliest birther texts. I never considered those people to be genuine Democrats, and thus did not link to any of their posts.

The real PUMA movement centered around the Confluence. Love her or hate her, Riverdaughter was the real deal.

Being a scientist, Riverdaughter understood from the start that birtherism was sheer nonsense. Neither she nor any other contributor to her site ever published one positive word about that idiotic theory.

Throughout this period, I was "kinda, sorta" aligned with the PUMA movement. What differentiated me from someone like Riverdaughter is...well, in the first place, she's a better writer than I am, at least on those occasions when she's fully engaged. More importantly, she was and is Hillary Clinton's number one fan, with the possible exception of Chelsea.

For my part, the situation was always more complicated. I was not so much a Hillary supporter as an Obama opponent. It was all too easy to predict what kind of president Obama would be -- and to forecast the damage he would do to the Democratic brand name. Hillary Clinton deserved support because she was the only person standing between Obama and the nomination. Of course, her sheer grit and tenacity during that battle eventually won me over.

For the most part, Riverdaughter preferred to ignore the birther phenomenon. I did pay attention to it, but that attention was not sympathetic.

Larry Johnson publicized an analysis by someone who went by the name of "Techdude," an alleged forensic specialist. He claimed that, by using the imaging program GIMP, he could determine that Obama's "short form" birth certificate was a forgery. The Techdude posts were filled with "fancy footwork" that bedazzled the gullible while providing nothing of probative value. I've used Photoshop (the pro app that does what GIMP does) professionally since the very first iteration of that program, and I could not replicate this fellow's directives. Neither could anyone else.

Despite The Daily Beast's claims that birtherism began on the left, none of the original birth certificate loons were bona-fide lefties or real PUMA folk. Eventually, they all showed their true colors as right-wing wackos: Larry Johnson, Orly Taitz, the freaks behind HillBuzz, Phil Berg, Linda Starr, the vile "Texas Darlin," and the ultra-mega-hyper-vile Pamela Geller. Most of these people were pretty easy to figure out -- for example, I found evidence that "Texas Darlin" had been a contributor to the far-right Free Republic site, which is not normally known as a hotbed of pro-Clinton activism. Texas Darlin' (who later pushed a lie that Michelle Obama had been disbarred) had the same IP number as the ultra-weird Larry Sinclair, the oddball who claimed that Obama had been a male hooker.

(Were Larry and TD one and the same? Hm!)

As for Johnson -- well, allow me to reprint some words I published in 2008:
In previous posts, I detailed how Larry Johnson's No Quarter deliberately inflamed the public with a false story about the allegedly "forged" Obama birth certificate. That site published as established fact -- without any caveats or "maybes" -- the claim that a professional image analyst was able to discern the name of Barack Obama's sister in the candidates much-disputed Certificate of Live Birth.

Did No Quarter publish a single image backing up this assertion? No. The site published all sorts of other images, but not the one that mattered.

No-one has replicated these "findings." No Photoshop professional found the details comprehensible. The source of the claim, "Techdude," has now been exposed as an utter fraud.

Has No Quarter issued an apology? Nope.

Johnson and his confreres (Texas Darlin' and Susan UnPC) maintain an aggressive, belligerent stance, despite having about as many legs to stand on as Monty Python's black knight.

Think about it: If your blog published a major piece of false information -- one that sparked a firestorm of public interest -- wouldn't you show a little humility when the whole thing was revealed as a crap-fest of deception?
You can't understand what happened to PUMA unless you understand the tactics of infiltration and political imposture. To the best of my knowledge, none of the "birthers" had any previous history of liberal activism. The genuine PUMA writers, the ones who could be trusted, all had Riverdaughter's seal of approval.

(Well, she never really approved of me. But how could she? I'm an unclassifiable, ornery ol' bastard who pisses off everyone on every side of every issue. And proud of it!)
Comments:
No question the birth certificate issue was fueled by rightwingers, but to be fair, they were also frothing over where McCain was born.

 
When Trump says Putin called him "brilliant", he's talking shit. NBC get it right: Putin called Trump "яркии" (iarkii). If I recall correctly, Putin has said that he considers Trump to the most "яркии" candidate. In context the best translation is "colourful". He's saying Trump is the most colourful candidate. He's right.

May I be the first to observe that if a Russian intelligence asset is running for the US presidency, saying how much he admires Putin and Putin admires him is rather poor cover.

I know that disinformation is often largely true, and sometimes it is even wholly true (but misdirectional), but this would seem to be going too far.

But then I've watched the Manchurian Candidate. (I apologise for not having read the novel: my copy has been in a box for several years. If the normal rule applies, it's surely better than the film.) In the film, the KGB asset who is aiming to become US president is a McCarthy-style figure. Maybe film audiences in 1959 were a little more sophisticated than most media consumers nowadays. The guy didn't go around saying "I admire Khrushchev" and "Khrushchev says I'm brilliant". That would have been, y'know, a bit of a giveaway.

The US and Russia are going to be on opposite sides in WW3, Trump or no Trump.

And here's an interesting connection... In his introduction to an edition of the novel, David Willis McCullough states that the assassin's mother, a power broker who is married to the said US presidential candidate, was modelled on none other than Joseph McCarthy's lawyer, Roy Cohn.

Cohn was the mobbed-up lawyer who enabled a young landlord and property developer called Donald Trump to extend his business activities into Manhattan.
 
I was sitting on the thread the night the PUMA acronym was borne, though I don't recall who exactly put it together, but certainly The Confluence was PUMA central and I still tell people who can relate that I'm a PUMA. I was a regular on No Quarter until the birtherism really got out of hand and it became obvious even to little old me that there was some serious rodent humping going on. tRump is the champion of birtherism and he can continue to deny he is a racist, Russian stooge prick, but that won't change the fact that that is exactly what he is.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home


This page is 

powered by Blogger. 

Isn't yours?


























Image and video hosting by TinyPic


FeedWind



FeedWind




FeedWind