Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Confirmation: The man observed

Yeah, I know. This is the third post (probably two more than you wanted to read) devoted to an email exchange published in Liberal Rapture. The previous installments can be found here and here.

The exchange was between a well-known writer who supports Obama and a black female Democratic activist who got to know the real Barack Obama, and who now has some very critical things to say about Our Dear Leader. Since LR hid the names of both correspondents, some of my readers suspected forgery.

We now know that the exchange is real. Cannonfire readers, especially our resident linguistic analyst G, identified the pro-O writer as James Kunstler. (See comments here.) Kunstler, best-known for his books The Long Emergency and The Geography of Nowhere, keeps a web page here and a blog somewhere else. He has admitted to G that the emails are no forgery. (Thanks, G!)

Is the matter important? That all depends on how much value you place on the delicious first-hand observations offered by Kunstler's anti-O correspondent, whom we will re-christen "Fredricka." (My deepest apologies for first using the code-name "Fred.") To recap (and remember, this is all vis-a-vis Obi):
I have found him to be a rather deceitful person who, certainly, is smart enough but whose vaunted intelligence is vastly overrated - his judgment even more so.
Moreover, I haven't found his writing (which has only been about himself) or his post-graduate career to be anything that would lend me to think more highly of his intelligence.
He skims the surface of issues and problems. In fact, his remarks, when not prepared come across as vapid. He repeats, like rote, tired democratic tropes. (And frankly many Republican ones. He truly does admire Reagan and not just because Reagan won elections).

He seems to have spent little to no time in deep introspection about any particular area of policy. He spent very little time at his actual job in the Senate or doing any substantive work - which was similar to his time in the IL State Senate.
He certainly...seems to at bottom be relatively incurious about geopolitics. And, he would get a glazed look in his eyes and look about for someone else to move on to when I raised questions about how he would address the looming US financial crisis I could see on the horizon.
I can also say how shocked I became at the really dishonest tactics he used, from race-baiting to caucus fraud to paying cyber stalkers to terrorize pro-Clinton writers and website owners.
For goodness sake, the man broke virtually every important promise he made during the primary campaign as soon as it was over, and he's busy continuing this trend now that he's president.
And, he was certainly fairly animated when talking about his "life" and "his story which could only have happened in the U.S." (tell that to all my relatives and friends in the UK and Germany who are biracial with one African parent) and how he went into politics "for his girls future" and when asking us to reach deep in our pockets to help him succeed. It was only when he was pressed to delve deeply into significant policy issues that he became uninterested, bored and fidgety.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

OK i may have been wrong about Edwina-- but i was right about Fredrika.

Anonymous said...

John, I think I know who the African American woman in question is, but have no way to verify. Thoughts?
I don't want to speculate wildly, or reveal identities of people who would not approve. But, just as my gut told me that the writer was a woman, my gut says that the woman I found is the right one. Which means, I could be way wrong.

Anne said...

You would think someone who wrote " The Long Emergency " would be brighter than to fall so deeply under the Barry kool aid spell. All you had to do was a little research and not hate the Clintons to a fever pitch. It seems that was asking too much of alot of people .

However learning that Mr.Kunstler isn't as smart as I thought actually makes me feel better! Perhaps Mr. Kunstler is wrong about other stuff too?? ( most likely not)

John Smart said...

Cinie, she can reveal herself if she wants. Frankly, I only know her "handle" so can't be of much help.

About Kunstler: I have realized something in reading him for a period of years - you have to cut his alarmist impulses by 50% to see the truth in what he writes. His oozing hatred of Clinton (and all strong women?)overwhelmed his thinking about Obama.

Same goes for his contempt of suburbia. He hates it so much that his writing on peak oil is compromised. It is still good. But he wants suburbia to implode so badly he ends up making foolish predictions.

Anonymous said...

A minor perplexing issue for me during the campaign was Kunstler's O-love. The man can practically see through walls (or so it seems in this national environment of willful blindness) and he can't see through Obama's ridiculous charade? Had me scratching my head all year.

Anonymous said...

Those people who followed O blindly were not stupid, actually I guess he was a tool for them to get rid of Hillary and Bill. They used each other, with no thoughts what so ever for the people and the country.

Anonymous said...

Kuntsler's O-love was a direct outgrowth of his Hillary hatred. I used to read his blog fairly regularly, until his Hillary-hating ways got to be too much (and this was back when I wasn't even a fan of hers and was supporting Edwards in the primary). Also, Kuntsler is a hopeless snob, and a large part of his peak-oil theorizing is aesthetically based--he simply abhors the suburbs and the people who populate them and longs for the post-peak-oil day when they will get their payback for inhabiting such ugly dwellings. So of course, Obama would appeal to a snob like Kunstler. Here's a link to just one of Kuntsler's posts, if anyone needs a taste of his contempt for Hillary and those who supported her.

It is a shame that Kuntsler was so blindsided by his Hillary hatred that he was incapable of assessing Obama's own character deficits. Oh well. As Annie said, one could hope his stupidity in that regard means that he's wrong about peak oil and our coming long emergency as well. Unfortunately I suspect he's right about a lot of that.

Inky

Anonymous said...

tom,

It's how the bigotry of this campaign played out. No one - NO ONE - called the Democratic candidates out on willful misogynist rhetoric. To my mind, an absolutely astonishing development.

Bigoted language works by relying on demeaning cultural stereotypes for its punch. I started off as an Edwards supporter, and always referred to him as "my boy" - you can do that with a white guy because we have no cultural stereotype about white guys being too shiftless to hold jobs or carry their weight. But calling Obama a boy would be a very different thing because there are stereotypes that have built up over centuries to demean and control African American men. Saying Obama was "my boy" would have had a very different meaning. Obama engaged in the most outrageously bigoted language I've heard since Claytie Williams ran against Ann Richards when he said that Clinton "periodically gets down" and "attacks" to "boost her appeal". That's as offensive as if McCain talked about Obama sitting around in his hotel room, drinking wine with his buddies and playing craps rather than going on and campaigning. Then there his reduction of her foreign policy work as "tea with ambassadors" - no different than if someone had assessed Obama's time in Springfield to "shoe shining". No one called him on any of that rhetoric. Yet bigoted language is quantifiable. Factor in NO ONE saying a peep about Randi Rhodes' diatribe, and you have a situation where the message from the Democratic establishment was that open season on clinton was in process and nothing was off the mark bringing us to a point where Shuster could accuse her of "pimping" out her daughter and Olbermann could fantasize about some man taking her into a room and beating until the point where she could not leave. You do have to wonder how far someone would have had to have gone for Pelosi or Dean to step up to the plate. So, men like Kuntsler, who already wrestle with entitlement issues, found their darker angels validated (the exact process by which the GOP has maintained control of our cultural dialogue since Reagan).

Anonymous said...

You and your fascist acolytes are becoming crazier and crazier. Totally delusional and totally irrelevant.
You would be the kind that would find fault with Christ Himself. A modern Pharisee.

Anne said...

"...So, men like Kuntsler, who already wrestle with entitlement issues, found their darker angels validated (the exact process by which the GOP has maintained control of our cultural dialogue since Reagan)

very well put.

You do have to wonder how far someone would have had to have gone for Pelosi or Dean to step up to the plate.

Wonder no more!

IMO, nothing would have caused them to say a dang thing. NO act or statement would have caused them to say anything about the shocking misogyny directed towards Hillary and her supporters.

However if some one said Michelle's upper arms were not buff enough....then it would have been DNC / media guns ablazing !!!

Anonymous said...

Inky,

That is a staggeringly hateful post you linked. as if Obama wasn't going to face those exact issues, and as if Hillary wasn't aware of them.

There is a tremendous amount of mental illness on display in that post. He sounds like some out of control Austrian complaining about Jews. I wonder how he feels when he has to shake hands with a woman.

Anonymous said...

I had the same reaction to Kunstler. He's someone I regarded quite highly and yet his O-love and CDS were at such extreme degrees it seemed incongruous. Well, a lot of otherwise smart people I know have been utterly blinded by the Obama Light. I have no explanation for it. Nor do I care to know, frankly, at this point.

I think Inky's point about Kunstler's snobbism is a good one.