In the meantime, this teaser:
The late Alexander Litvinenko was a former FSB spook who became a paid liar in the employ of Boris Berezovsky, the shadowy exiled Russian oligarch (and business partner of Neil Bush). Berezovsky hopes to destabilize Putin and take control of what was once the second superpower.
Before the assassination, few in Russia respected Litvinenko. Few outside of Russia heard of him. Now, a film will be made of his life. The project, starring Daniel Craig (the new James Bond), will derive, in large part, from Litvinenko's book Blowing up Russia.
In that work, Litvinenko attempts to demonstrate that Vladimir Putin was responsible for the apartment bombings of 1999. However, in “Storm in Moscow”: A Plan of the Yeltsin “Family” to Destabilize Russia, an extremely important paper written by the Hoover Institution's John B. Dunlop, a starkly different picture emerges. (Oddly, the Hoover Institute has wiped all trace of this paper from its site.) As Peter Dale Scott summarizes:
Dunlop's thesis is in itself an alarming one. It is that men of influence in the Kremlin, building on the connections established by the wealthy oligarch Boris Berezovskii, were able to arrange for staged violence, in order to reinforce support for an unpopular Russian government. This staged violence took the form of lethal bombings in the capital and an agreed-upon incursion by Chechens into Russian Dagestan.Dunlop argues that Litvinenko's one-time employer, Boris Berezovsky -- the man who would rule Russia -- arranged these provocations in the final months of the Yeltsin era to prevent reformists from taking control.
Yeltsin, a heavy drinker in poor health, was not the true leader of Russia. Decisions were made by a conspiratorial group calling itself "The Family," which still wields enormous power. Despite the title of Dunlop's monograph, the leader of the Family was not Yeltsin; Yeltsin's daughter Tatyana, Boris Berezovsky (who was vying to become the Rupert Murdoch of Russia) and a handful of others held the real power.
Putin was once a member of this Family. Upon achieving power, he turned against the oligarchs. Ever since, Berezovsky has plotted vengeance.
Long-time readers of this blog will recall that we have encountered the term "The Family" before, in relation to 9/11. I will argue in my upcoming piece that the Berezovskii Family and the Family mentioned by Mohammed Atta were, in fact, one and the same.
You will see subtle evidence to that effect for yourself if you carefully read the Dunlop and Scott pieces cited above. You should also study an important piece by Yuri Yasenev (obviously derived from Russian intelligence files), "An Orange Revolution is in store for Russia."
A mysterious company called Far West Ltd. may have functioned as a business front fro the Family. One of the partners in Far West is Dick Cheney's Haliburton.
An officer of Far West described the firm's business as "connected with the secured transport of commercial shipments from Afghanistan." Decide for yourself how best to interpret those words.
The Family established a wide array of international contacts. Key decisions were taken at a 1999 meeting in Adnan Khashoggi's villa in the south of France. That such a meeting took place is beyond question; Khashoggi himself has admitted as much, although the actual topic of the discussion remains disputed. It is known that French intelligence and the Israelis had a good idea of what went on.
And yet the very existence of this meeting was denied by none other than Alexander Litvinenko. (See footnote 24 of Scott's piece.)
Why would Litvinenko lie about such a thing?
We have many indications that, after the publication of this book, Litvinenko and his patron had a falling out. We know that Litvinenko had planned to blackmail certain exiled oligarchs. Although he did not mention Berezovsky by name, we may fairly presume that he was a potential target.
Virtually all of the suspects in the Litvinenko murder have some tie to Berezovsky.
What was said at Khashoggi's villa? What did Alexander Litvinenko threaten to reveal to the world?
Nota bene: If you are going to do follow-up research, I suggest beginning with Dunlop's thesis, which will reward a leisurely study. Professor Scott covers a wider scope and spotlights some of Dunlop's shortcomings; however, Scott writes in an academic style which some will find impenetrable. (Like many scholars, he assumes that his readers have already familiarized themselves with the material listed in the footnotes.) Dunlop provides a clear, linear narrative which manages to be both gripping yet scrupulously annotated.
I know that I have offered a simplistic and crude introduction to a very complex tale. This is, as I said, but a teaser.
13 comments:
Joe, this is precisely why we can't lose you. (That and the fact that I'd have to find at least another hour's worth of work each day to keep from looking idle...)
amen, mazoola
double amen
yes Joseph, we love your research, your humor, your brain power, your writing skills and your prickley attitude. Please do not allow that prickley part to dominate all the other fine and honorable parts.
Tell the prickley person inside to get lost!
the Dunlop piece has gone missing. Can you post it somehow?
Anon (well, most recent Anon) -
Either minor Blogger- or Joe-error; paper is available here.
Ah, this is bound to be interesting and a good example of why you ought to keep your blog.
I don't agree with your take on CD and a couple of other things. I probably find it just exactly as maddening as you do.
However, there is always room for honest people to just shake their heads at each other, move past a deadlock, and tear into a fresh piece of meat.
good work joe.
i'm with mazoola et al
don't let the bastards grind you down.
I've been reading you off and on for a few weeks now, and your combination of insight and humor is a rare commodity on this side of the net, as I'm sure the CD-ers have shown.
Seriously. Take a break if you need one. I for one will be waiting when--if--you return.
I think the behavior of the CD-ers who are posting here if they are geniune in their belief in an alternate history of the 9/11 events are alienating an important ally. This is the type of zealotry that loses political battles. Two groups of people ostensibly on the same "side" of an issue disagreeing to the point of losing the fight. Not that your behavior deserves any criticism. If the CD-ers weren't as zealous and could see the common ground, and behave civilly in the process we would all be closer to exposing the truth.
I look forward to your investigative information and analysis, Joe. I believe I have read much the same take from Wayne Madsen in recent weeks on his website, and I know you also use Hopsicker as a source. When numerous investigators like yourselves are pretty much on the same wavelength it makes your material all the more credible and persuasive. How about also tying in the recent arrest of Scaramella by Italian police?
If you can make sense of Far West and its nest of connections, Joe, you'll have my undying gratitude. I've been trying to sort that stuff out for the last year without getting anywhere.
According to Peter Dale Scott, Far West is connected with Diligence LLC, which in turn is connected with Joe Allbaugh, formerly of FEMA and all-purpose Bush crony. After Allbaugh left FEMA, he set up a company called New Bridge, which was supposed to make everyone concerned rich by participating in the rebuilding of Iraq.
New Bridge was affiliated with Diligence and also had connections with something called Crest Investment Corporation -- whose co-chairman was Neil Bush, the sometimes traveling companion of Boris Berezovsky.
Far West itself is coming under increasing pressure these days, in part due to that Peter Dale Scott essay. A recent article quotes its head, Vladimir Filin, as complaining that the CIA and Mossad are out to get him, saying:
"External pressure on the Kremlin is strong and open, but not always successful. Therefore the US and Israel need new means for pressuring [Russia]. Specifically, there has been a decision made to discredit the mechanism of political decisions in Russian arms trade by portraying it as corrupted. Supposedly, Venezuela, Syria, Iran, Sudan and other "outcast countries" pay bribes to the Kremlin through some alleged middlemen to get political approval for arms contracts. I don't know anything about such bribes. I assume they do not exist. But this is not important for the CIA and Mossad. All they need is to find a convenient candidate for the role of the alleged middleman, make him testify, and then to spin the scandal in the unprincipled international mass media. It is well-known how skillfully Western press demonizes businessmen from the former Soviet Union without any proof [of their guilt]. It suffices to recall the unbridled campaign of slanders against such a law-abiding person as Victor Bout, who was turned into an international outcast.
Nowadays, the CIA and Mossad are trying to do something similar with the agency Far West LLC (formerly "Far West Ltd") now by threatening it, now promising all kind of rewards for "cooperation."
Simultaneously, in the West, Ukraine, and Russia, the US and Israeli intelligence services and their agents of influence in Kiev and Moscow have started a campaign of psychological pressure against "Far West LLC." In the Internet they've been creating a reference base, both in Russian and English, for the planned publications in leading Western media outlets, which usually serve as a prelude for criminal investigations and arrests.
Under these conditions, the leadership of "Far West LLC"--who does not wish to smear themselves and to play into the hands of the enemies of mankind--the United Sates, NATO, and Israel--have transferred the management of the agency from Europe to the United Arab Emirates, Brazil, Turkey, Iran, and Ukraine, that is to those countries where the blatant provocations of the US and Mossad are less easy to conduct and where extradition is impossible unless in the form of kidnapping and other illegal activities.”
At the same time those in the Kremlin must clearly understand that no private structure by itself, without support can oppose the state, especially such powerful as the United States and Israel."
Link
Your link to Dunlop's article is broken.
Let me add two pennies to this investigation. The security firm Erynus holds signicant interest in Far West LLC.
Post a Comment