tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post8338920447860775896..comments2024-03-24T15:27:49.804-04:00Comments on CANNONFIRE: Nonsense, history and language (update)Joseph Cannonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10574779960109698980noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-17135589228048409112009-08-15T08:35:38.992-04:002009-08-15T08:35:38.992-04:00Ummm yeah I looked this up in the Peshitta (the Ar...Ummm yeah I looked this up in the Peshitta (the Aramaic Bible- http://www.peshitta.org/)<br /><br />And it does not say what the author of the video states it does...<br /><br />Also the whole thing about Aramaic being the oldest form of Hewbrew... ppfffftttt... That's a good laugh...<br /><br />Here is an Excerpt from the e-Mail I sent to the author...<br /><br />"Dear Sir, In your video: "ORIGINAL - DID JESUS GIVE US THE NAME OF THE ANTICHRIST?"<br /><br />There is a slight Exegetical error at time stamp: 0:30-It is stated that Aramaic is the most ancient form of Hebrew this is most assuredly un-true... we both know that Aramaic/Syriac is the Aramaeain from of Hebrew from the the Achaemenid Empire of Cyrus the Great...<br /><br />The history of Aramaic is broken down into three broad periods:<br /><br />Old Aramaic (1100 BC–200 AD), including:<br />The Biblical Aramaic of the Hebrew Bible.<br />The Aramaic of Jesus.<br /><br />Middle Aramaic (200–1200), including:<br />Literary Syriac.<br />The Aramaic of the Talmuds, Targumim, and Midrashim.<br />Mandaic.<br /><br />Modern Aramaic (1200–present), including:<br />Various modern vernaculars.<br /><br />Hebrew is the main language of the Hebrew Bible.Mostly used in the books of Daniel, Ezra and a few other places in the Hebrew Bible and should not be confused with the later Aramaic translations of the Hebrew Bible known as targumim... Aramaic only accounts for about 250 verses out of a total of over 23,000. Biblical Aramaic is closely related to Hebrew being that both are in the Northwest Semitic language family."<br /><br />No response...<br /><br />ohh well...Joshuahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15159852360319809279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-90758033728093946362009-08-05T03:13:38.370-04:002009-08-05T03:13:38.370-04:00Obama is not the antichrist.
Obama is the Lightbr...Obama is not the antichrist.<br /><br />Obama is the Lightbringer, which translates into latin as "Lucifer."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-87062484264731819372009-08-04T20:31:35.728-04:002009-08-04T20:31:35.728-04:00I love your post - and my next comment has nothing...I love your post - and my next comment has nothing to do with you. It has to do with the idiots who are the root of this whole story.<br /><br />GET A LIFE! Seriously, to sit and pontificate on something you know nothing about on the whole subject of "religion" and "God said", is about the biggest waste of time I can imagine.<br /><br />Actually, I'm glad you posted this, It brought me my first laugh of the day. <br /><br />Oh, the Clintons score - again! Wonder how long it will take for BO to take credit for Bill's mission to N. Korea?Marshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04729627562550166150noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-10788144777446748472009-08-04T19:21:37.153-04:002009-08-04T19:21:37.153-04:00Yup...Obama's is the Anti-Christ.
Unmmm...wa...Yup...Obama's is the Anti-Christ. <br /><br />Unmmm...wait. Wasn't Reagan the "Anti-Christ?" he of the 666?<br /><br />I find these "beast's" hard to keep track.RedDragonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11851703091586850869noreply@blogger.com