tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post3293550260984292262..comments2008-10-02T07:35:21.200-07:00Josephhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10574779960109698980noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-49301614830149557252008-09-20T11:55:00.000-07:002008-09-20T11:55:00.000-07:008 U.S.C. §1401(g)<BR/><BR/>Mr. Cannon, your analysis of the law is inaccurate. You missed an extemrely important factor See below: <BR/><BR/>301 NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH <BR/><BR/>SEC. 301. [8 U.S.C. 1401] <BR/><BR/>The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: <BR/><BR/>(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: This is the part you missed - Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 28 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; <BR/><BR/>Mr. Obama's mother was the U.S. citizen, she was not serving an honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, she was not employed with the United States Government or with an international organization as defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 28 <BR/><BR/>The code you have cited is incorrect and does not apply to this case or Mr. Obama. <BR/><BR/>You can however do a search for the American or U.S. Embassy in foreign countries, look at births abroad, follow it to the year Mr. Obama was born, the applicable law is cited, which is the very same law outlined in Mr. Berg's pleadings. Mr. Berg's pleadings can be found at obamacrimes.com<BR/><BR/>Respectfully,<BR/>Mr. Berg's AssistantPhiliphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03784622230909831171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-39146750642909799452008-07-21T16:19:00.000-07:002008-07-21T16:19:00.000-07:00This Chicago Tribune article dated March 27, 2007, refers to Ann Dunham's marriage six months prior to Barack's birth, and her divorce from Barack Sr. in 1964.<BR/>http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-0703270151mar27,0,1310554.story?page=1<BR/>The divorce should be easy enough to trace.Citizen Khttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00044466045014015160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-16014467721949930882008-07-04T17:56:00.000-07:002008-07-04T17:56:00.000-07:00Umm...about that part of 301(g) that conservative bloggers allegedly ignore...note that it refers to the PROVISO. That is the part that you neglected to actually cite, yourself. <BR/><BR/>You know the "proviso" is the part that starts "Provided"... It says that being in the military overseas can be used to count toward the required years. That's what is referred to as retroactive to 1952.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-83389702354197883252008-07-02T07:54:00.000-07:002008-07-02T07:54:00.000-07:00You do good work. Is it possible to determine whether the bc templates of Opendna were made from the Kos Obama bc, or whether they existed previoulsy. the time of birth being 7:24pm on both cannot be a coincidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-49863175865067234852008-06-13T07:34:00.000-07:002008-06-13T07:34:00.000-07:00LOL! Welcome to yesterday's news guys. No, it wasn't a KOS exclusive. <BR/><BR/>http://www.fightthesmears.com<BR/><BR/>That's his own website. Lose the hate and the paranoia please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-50007112577035727832008-06-12T21:52:00.000-07:002008-06-12T21:52:00.000-07:00I'm very scared for the Party right now. Joseph may get his wish here—total credibility shredding of the Kos crew—soon. Personally, I think the MSM is waiting until as much of the left as possible is behind Obama before breaking the scandal (which may be why folks like Gore have decided to lie low).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-10157659863490636682008-06-12T17:42:00.000-07:002008-06-12T17:42:00.000-07:00Joseph:<BR/><BR/>Re time of birth question -<BR/>I haven't reproduced either except on a photocopier - erm - that sounds wrong! :-) LOL! So my info is academic only!<BR/><BR/>The first breath of the newborn is supposed to be the time to record -but officially recorded times aren't reliable from what I can gather. The midwife probably goes off to have a coffee before filling in the paperwork, then inserts her best guess. Unless the father stands at the bedside with a stopwatch, it's a bit hit and miss in most cases.Twilighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-53547944436138338812008-06-12T17:04:00.000-07:002008-06-12T17:04:00.000-07:00And yes, everyone is racist. Same as women are sexist. The issue is about power. <BR/><BR/>It is rather odd for it to appear on Kos. I shall have to look up how they explain it. Anonymous poster to the site?<BR/><BR/>HarryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-25398008920628827602008-06-12T14:40:00.000-07:002008-06-12T14:40:00.000-07:00There are actually a number of OTHER issues Obama will be soon facing that many don’t know about. Some have been explained here but the larger story isn’t well known.<BR/><BR/>Link:<BR/>Board Games - Chicago Style<BR/>http://newsbyus.com/index.php/article/734<BR/>by Jack L. Key (6/12/08)<BR/><BR/>A glimpse at a larger problem is what Operation Board Games is after. I’ll offer that Chicago/Illinois is also used as a huge Laundromat involving big Banks and others. I was in a family for more than 26 years who’s directly involved in the Laundromat using the big Banks and can tell you that it’s beyond huge. <BR/><BR/>Obama may have many questions surrounding his birth but it’s nothing compared to what is up head. Rezko’s Trial showed him to be involved in a bird’s nest corruption scheme overseeing many control areas for the State under the Governor. But I know from the family that it’s more extensive than this. It has ties all the way up into the Federal area as well as throughout and into other areas. One important area to consider is how they use the many different boards to oversee and manage the Corporations involved for criminal activities. <BR/><BR/>Chiquita (Tribune Company) as an example was caught supplying Guns and seemed to get off with only a slap on their wrist. But what most don’t know is that Chiquita among others were distributing huge amounts of drugs linked with a larger corruption scheme that will astound everyone. Some of this in parts has already been in the news. <BR/><BR/>My ex-wife’s family is directly involved in the Illinois/Chicago Combine as it’s usually called as my younger son is directly involved with Rezko to my dismay. It’ll be unfortunate that maybe he will have his turn with explaining his role some day. But the family also is directly involved in air freighting huge amounts of drugs as “Clyde O’Connor”, my ex-sister-in-law’s brother was caught red handed with Greg Smith in Mexico last September. The family often bragged being a “CIA Asset” thus they would never be caught. But times have changed!<BR/><BR/>See Link:<BR/>Madcow Morning news<BR/> http://www.madcowprod.com/<BR/><BR/>I won’t explain what else is known at this point other than to say that Obama’s link to Rezko going back decades more than suggests he is involved far deeper than it appears. Plus what I’ve said above that has been blocked by MSM and only exists on the Internet supports my comment suggesting how huge this is.<BR/><BR/>Barak Obama needs to take a good hard look in the mirror and accept that his past is surfacing for all to know. Anyone can run for President and even be supported financially by many, but if you’ve been involved in criminal behavior you won’t end up being the President in the end. Again, times have changed!<BR/><BR/>Marty Didier<BR/>Northbrook, ILAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-57018605514071186862008-06-12T14:16:00.000-07:002008-06-12T14:16:00.000-07:00I would be very suspicious of anything Kos puts up on his site as proof of anything. How long would it take anyone to photoshop a birth certificate to say anything you wanted it to? Let's not forget about the claims of Clinton making Obama's face more black than it is, et al. Those who accuse this type of thing are usually guilty of doing the very things they accuse others of.CognitiveDissonancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10992013344343613904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-10665256132604337912008-06-12T14:07:00.000-07:002008-06-12T14:07:00.000-07:00I've never reproduced, and now you have me curious -- just how do they determine the exact minute of birth? I mean, is it when the first body part starts to emerge, or when the cord is cut, or when he or she first asks for the car keys, or what?Josephhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10574779960109698980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-45086257906432447412008-06-12T12:53:00.000-07:002008-06-12T12:53:00.000-07:00It's odd, isn't it, that the Obama campaign would hand over the certificate of birth (as opposed to The Birth Certificate) to El Kos rather than just display it on the official site when all the hoo-haa about it began?<BR/><BR/>I doubt it's a forgery, but why be so secretive in the first place I wonder. Maybe just trying to stir up conjecture and proving his opponents wrong in dramatic(?) fashion. A bit of stagecraft perhaps?<BR/><BR/>Ah well, it'll give the astrologers something to talk about, the time of birth is different - they've gone with 1.06pm, then 7.11pm, now it's 7.24. <BR/>Keeps the wheels of bloggery turnin', don't it!Twilighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-64696769246408489092008-06-12T12:38:00.000-07:002008-06-12T12:38:00.000-07:00John McCain was born in Panama. How come nobody is making a big deal about that?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-75913778203122045962008-06-12T12:06:00.000-07:002008-06-12T12:06:00.000-07:00No Joseph, only white people are racist. Kenyans might want their sons to only marry black people, Hutus don't let their kids marry Tutsis, young Chinese American women get their butts kicked for not marrying Chinese, just like man y "Italian" families want their kids to marry al interno della famiglia ...and don't get me started on a bar-mitva'ed marrying a shiksa... but only white people are racist. And they're all racist, unless of course, you know, they vote for OBbaarmaakWhitey LeBlanchttp://www.anus.com/metal/about/metal/black_metal/white_power.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6604414.post-55135507768614800822008-06-12T11:46:00.000-07:002008-06-12T11:46:00.000-07:00Who's Vetting the Smear Vetters?<BR/>(A VETTERS GUIDE)<BR/><BR/>Step One:<BR/>Raise a reasonably plausible Obama "background" question.<BR/><BR/>Step Two:<BR/>Move family to Utah.<BR/><BR/><>_<>Bubba Hussein O'Reillynoreply@blogger.com