Friday, August 18, 2017

Bannon out

When Roger Stone came out against Bannon, I knew: He's out. It's not official yet -- although the hammer may drop as I write -- but the exit sign is flashing, and even Drudge is predicting an adios.

Update: Yes, the NYT published the story even as I was writing these words...
Stephen K. Bannon, the embattled chief strategist who helped President Trump win the 2016 election but clashed for months with other senior West Wing advisers, is leaving his post, a White House spokeswoman announced Friday.

“White House Chief of Staff John Kelly and Steve Bannon have mutually agreed today would be Steve’s last day,” the White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said in a statement. “We are grateful for his service and wish him the best.”
In other words, Kelly made the decision -- probably while listening to Trump rant and rave the other day.

I love this bit from Axios:
One White House source twists the knife: "His departure may seem turbulent in the media, but inside it will be very smooth. He has no projects or responsibilities to hand off."
More:
One senior White House official said it seemed like Bannon was setting himself up to be a martyr — the nationalist hero fired by the "globalists."
Of course, there IS no "globalist" (read: Jewish) conspiracy against Bannon. Bannon is going because things are going bad and someone must be fired. Neither Trump nor Kelly can admit that Trump is the problem.
Bannon has felt freed this past week and has told friends that he is ready to go "medieval" on enemies of Trump and his populist agenda both in and out of the White House.
"Get ready for Bannon the barbarian."
Joy Reid has tweeted:
Hearing from a source that Bannon is going ugly. Stay tuned...
The obvious question, as asked by one of her readers: How much uglier can that guy get? I think the important consideration is that Trump, if he has to have any hope of lasting a full term, must eschew nationalism and become more of a conventional Republican -- but if he does move in that direction, Bannon will turn the Pepe people against the administration. That's no doubt the reason why, until now, it was thought safer to keep Bannon on the inside.

Sorry, Steve -- but if you're going to stage a "revolt against the modern world" (to borrow Evola's term), the White House is not the place.

Remember, remember...
From the Palmer Report (with all due caveats):
Way back in December of 2016, longtime Republican strategist Rick Wilson – who has stood loudly against Donald Trump from the start – posted a cryptic prediction on Twitter in Guy Fawkes style: “Remember, remember, The 8th of November, ‘Twas Putin, and treason and plot; I see no reason Why pro-Russian treason Should ever be forgot.” At the time it didn’t seem to refer to anything in particular. But this evening Wilson quoted his own poem and added “Just wanted to re-up this. You’ll know why in about two weeks.” (link). So what the heck is he referring to with this new message?
Color me skeptical. Wilson first came to my attention just before the election, when he promised a "bonkers" revelation that would destroy Trump. What we got instead was a bonkers last-minute smear against Hillary, claiming that she had been raided by the cops.

Added note: Doing the "I was not a Nazi" polka. Gotta love Jerrod Kuhn of NY, who joined the marchers in Charlottesville, and whose life is now being made much more difficult...
“I’m not a neo-Nazi,” he insisted. “I don’t belong to a German workers’ party from 1933. I’m a moderate Republican.”
"I never worked at zat camp! I am SWISS, I tell you! SWISS!!!"

Kuhn was filmed marching around with a bunch of torch-wielding would-be bullyboys chanting "Blood and soil." They yelled insults at Jews who were trying to hold a worship service. Kuhn's digital trail reveals that he enjoys hanging out with the "moderate Republicans" at the Daily Stormer.

Sometimes I wonder how Hitler would have defended himself, had he gone to trial at Nuremberg. "Adolf who? My name is Wally."

3 comments:

jo6pac said...

There is rumors that bannon will replace roger a. that will be fun;-)

b said...

Well I'm surprised Bannon has left. What next for Breitbart now?

So far, only a small amount of blood has flowed in the US as a result of the Trump presidency, and yet Bannon is out because keeping him would make Trump look bad in the media? If that is so, Trump may be in big trouble. Bannon is of a much higher calibre than Scaramucci. But I'm not at all sure that it is so.

Maggie Haberman and Michael Shear in the New York Times quote the same words as I quoted earlier, but interestingly they put a very different spin on them:

"Mr. Bannon mockingly played down the American military threat to North Korea as nonsensical: 'Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that 10 million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.'"

"Mockingly"? I read him as speaking the truth with a forked tongue, not as mocking.

Do the top brass want to wait a while before starting WW3, whereas Bannon is a Ledeenite "faster, please" guy? Just a hypothesis, but it's hard to imagine it might be the other way round. What else might the brass have against Bannon?

My hunch is that this relates to war preparations. Just how, I'm not sure.

nemdam said...

In fairness to Rick Wilson, he later admitted that the Trump "bombshell" that wasn't was the pee tape. Everyone in the media knew about both it and the dossier, and Rick thought it would drop. Not an endorsement of him, but I thought I should provide more context.