A brief question: If Donald Trump can call upon "Second Amendment people" to solve his Hillary problem, is it all right if I call upon "Article Three
people" to solve the Donald Trump problem?
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Seems to me that there are two hurdles here: 1. Is Russia technically our enemy? 2. Can we scare up two witnesses to an overt act?
The second question raises a third. Picture this: An NSA guy eavesdrops on a conversation between (say) Roger Stone and one of Putin's people. Does that NSA guy count as a witness? If the initial eavesdropper plays the tape for another NSA person, do we have two
The Constitution was written before the invention of audio recordings, so some interpretation is necessary.