Wednesday, October 16, 2013

BoehnerLand

No doubt you have already heard the news: Boehner and the Republicans have surrendered. For once, the other side has gone on a caving expedition.

I honestly don't think that Boehner wanted this excursion into madness. He was forced into it by the teabaggers. Right now, a lot of dazed and shaken people are asking a fundamental question: Just what is the Tea Party? Are they or are they not "true conservatives"?

Rush Limbaugh says that the baggers are the only true conservatives, and that the GOP is now "irrelevant" because they've thrown away the Tea Party. Meanwhile, Republican Charles Boustany (of LA) says that the Tea Partiers are neither Republicans nor true conservatives. Sean Hannity wants to form an official third party for true conservatives, and he wants Sarah Palin to be that party's candidate for a senatorial seat. And Carl Bernstein -- remember him?-- said that the baggers are a cancer similar to the segregationist Dems of the pre-LBJ era.

(Actually, the word "similar" doesn't apply. We're dealing with the offspring of the same people.)

The Tea Party's popularity has dipped, as one might have expected, but the number is still at 30 percent favorable, 49 percent unfavorable, with the biggest drop in favorability among moderate Republicans. (Also see here.) Basically, this is the same degree of popularity/unpopularity Dubya had to deal with in the last couple of years of his presidency.

Here's an interesting question: Although the poll numbers are similar, can we say that the TPers and the hard-core W supporters are the same people? I suspect that the teabagger battallions include a lot of people who never really bought into the whole neo-con we're-an-empire-now mindset.

Interestingly, there's evidence that the GOP overall is less popular than the Tea Party -- 28 percent favorability vs. 30 percent.

They never change. In Texas, the Lieutenant Governor has called for Obama's impeachment over -- I kid you not -- Benghazi. You'd think that on this day of all days, the GOP leaders would have gotten the word out: "Ixnay on the azy-cray."

Sadly, those people have forgotten how to adopt a veneer of sanity, which means that the ultra-conservatives will continue to seem nuttier than a Snickers bar. I say we should encourage that sort of behavior.

Polls suggest that the shutdown fallout could lead to a stronger Dem majority in the Senate. I wouldn't mind a filibuster-proof majority, although I would rather just have done with the filibuster altogether.

Oh, and I can't help mentioning one additional bit of cuteness. Mitch McConnell used the shutdown fight to sneak in added funding for a Kentucky project he liked. That's what I love about Republicans -- they never let their hatred of government stop them for asking for pork.

The next fight: Joan Walsh of Salon has argued that Dems in Congress should take this opportunity to get active:
When Social Security needs “fixing,” we should lift the cap on income subject to the payroll tax. The chained CPI is a cut and shouldn’t be a first offer, but a last resort.

Likewise, President Obama took a tax rate hike off the table this month in an interview with CNBC’s John Harwood; Congressional Democratic leaders should put it back on the table immediately.
Bravo to both ideas. But I do not expect to see the Dems attempt to do the right thing on either score.

The baggers are already ramping up the propaganda, trying to convince the world that Obama has been a massive spendthrift. In fact, the deficit has fallen dramatically, from ten percent of GDP to two percent.

Even more startling are these charts on the Brad Blog, which prove that, spending-wise, Obama has been far more conservative than Reagan and Bush were.


Also see the charts here, including this oft-ignored bit of good news:
One fact which hasn't changed over the last six months is this: the Affordable Care Act will shrink, not expand, the U.S. national debt. Nevertheless, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan responded to the CBO's latest report by warning, "We must provide relief to the families we serve. We should start by delaying Obamacare and paying down the debt to help grow the economy." But despite the mythmaking of John Boehner, Paul Ryan and their GOP allies, CBO has consistently concluded that the Affordable Care Act will reduce, not increase, the debt over the next decade...
I made that same point repeatedly in those little videos that appeared in this blog during the 2012 debates. Look, I'm not a big fan of Obamacare; I strongly advocated that we go to a single-payer system. But the current plan will save money. That's a fact. A lot of people believe otherwise, because a lot of people would rather get their information from Rush and Fox News instead of the Congressional Budget Office.

Fukuppy: Seriously, don't you think that everyone's favorite corporate mascot should be (as I suggested in the preceding post) the new symbol for Congress?

Just look at him. He's perfect for the job. He's a fat white guy with a bland, inane look on his face. He's held in place by big red clown shoes. Theoretically, those tiny blue wings could help him take flight -- but I suspect that those wings are actually non-functional.

If you don't recall the name of the guy who represents you, you needn't look it up. His name is Congressman Fukuppy.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree about Boehner. I just don't buy that he was holding back on this mess to simply save his job as Speaker. Regardless of what you think about Boehner this isn't his first rodeo. I don't know what the original plan was but Cruz screwed the pooch with his grandstanding. Right-wing radio and TV whipped the TP members into a frenzy. Defunding Obamacare has become a life and death matter.

Most Democrats wanted a single payer system like Medicare for all. There was no reason to reinvent the wheel on healthcare reform when 70% of the population wanted reform in 2008. Of course, the standard response was this [ACA] is as good as it gets with Republicans fighting tooth and nail. Despite all the compromises, turning in a version of Romneycare, the GOP still hates the plan and members routinely insist the sky will fall down without defunding and repeal.

Healthcare costs are eating the country alive and the unfairness of a system that rejected preexisting conditions and capping coverage on catastrophic illness and/or injury demanded to be changed. You'd be amazed at how quickly you reach those caps when a devastating illness/injury strikes. Bankruptcy is not a good fall back position.

ACA is loaded with flaws and the Federal rollout has been ragged at best [even Democrats are seriously complaining]. It is what it is.

But the Republican reaction is crazed. Got a kick out of a comment from one Republican rep tonight who claims that 'this President is determined to destroy the Republican party.'

Yup, Obama has driven them insane, made a public spectacle out of their members and I bet even planted that Confederate flag at Sunday's rally. Just to make TP members look bad.

As if any effort were required!

Peggysue [who never ceases to be amazed]

joseph said...

And don't you owe an apology to Booman, who was exactly right when he kept predicting that the Republicans would not shoot the hostage?