Wednesday, March 25, 2009

An attempt at definition

Krugman describes Geithner's plan as a "put option." So does Nemo, here.
I am of the opinion that most people, even intelligent laypeople, do not know that non-recourse high-leverage loans are equivalent to a put option. I suspect many of them do not even know or care what a put option is.
Well, I'll try to help. But before I do, please be advised that I am the only person I know who could not qualify for a home loan in 2004. In other words, few would consider me an expert.

What is a put option?

A put option is a bet that the price of a stock will go down.

Your name is Ed. You make a deal with Fred. "Fred," you say, "right now the price of BigWeenie Inc. is $12 a share. I want the option to sell you ten shares for that price -- one month from now. If you take this contract, I'll pay you a premium of a buck a share, right here and now. Such a deal, right?"

"Wow!" says Fred, who is easily impressed. "Ten whole smackers! How can I pass that up?"

A month passes. If BigWeenie shoots up, you're screwed. You don't have to go through with the deal (that's why it's called an option) but you never get that premium money back. You lost ten bucks. BigWeenie leaves a bad taste in your mouth.

But let's say BigWeenie goes flaccid. Let's say it's worth a limp and puny $5 per share. You buy ten shares for $50 and now you can sell them to Fred for $110. (Unlike you, Fred is obligated to keep his part of the bargain. That's why you paid him that premium.) Now Fred is the one who feels screwed by BigWeenie.

What is a non-recourse loan?

Ed wants to borrow $30,000 from Fred. As collateral, Ed offers his prized copy of X-Men number 1. (This is actually a good price.) Fred takes the deal.

The time comes for Ed to pay back the loan -- but he doesn't. "Fine," says Fred. "I'll take the comic book." And so he does.

Bad news: The local comic book dealer tells Fred that the bottom has fallen out of the market. Maybe there was a bubble, and maybe the bubble has burst. For whatever reason, that copy of X-Men #1 is now worth $15,000 -- max.

And that's it. That is a non-recourse loan. Fred can't get any more money from Ed. Ed has no personal liability. The comic book -- the collateral -- is all Fred gets. He has no other recourse.

What is leverage?

Leverage is borrowing money to invest. This occurs when Fred, who has $100 bucks, borrows enough cash to buy $1000 worth of BigWeenie Inc.

The bank indulged in a leverage fantasy when it offered Ed a house loan for no money down, on the expectation that the property would keep going up in value. An even more dangerous leverage fantasy occurred when an investment bank borrowed money to buy a fancy-schmancy financial instrument based on the hallucination that Ed was going to keep up his payments. As St. Anthony of Padua once observed, leverage is a motherfucker.

2 comments:

Gary McGowan said...

An economy wrecked by over leveraging (borrowing) on fraudulent paper will now be saved by providing low cost leverage (borrowing) to buy fraudulent paper.

Your first reaction to Fed and Treasury intentions might be "Are these guys nuts?"

The better question is what do they know that the general populous does not?

The answer to that is the entire mountain of OTC derivatives is falling down.

There is ONE simple cause of this crisis and that is OTC derivatives. By refusal to face the real problem there will be no solution at all. The result of this denial is hyper-inflation.

It is so sad that we accept that all our elected officials and CEOs of major companies are devout criminals ...

The Treasury will fix nothing by planning to make soft loans to finance one trillion dollars worth of OTC derivative purchases. The dirt will certainly be in the details of the financing that you will never see.

This is creative accounting and it is nothing else.

Keep in mind that an OTC derivative is an unfunded special performance contract. Under the law the ONLY way to cancel contracts is the US government declaring by Presidential Order an Economic Emergency...

-----------

G-20 Must Freeze The $1.5 Quadrillion Derivatives Bubble As The First Step To World Economic Recovery, By Webster Tarpley, 3-22-9 (article at Rense com.) It refers to Krugman at
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/21/despair-over-financial-policy/?pagemode=print

In Krugman, problem globally is over one quadrillion.

What a mess Washington has on its hands because of one non-simple thing, OTC derivatives.

The predictable result of all this is hyperinflation and a totally bombed out dollar as financial firms consolidate into less than 12 entities in the USA. My estimate is this will have occurred before 2012.

------------- All the above are snips from Jim Sinclair at jsmineset.com – He truly understands the financial and Fed. operations. However, he is neither a physical economist nor statesman (nor does he pretend to be).

Bob Harrison said...

Great post. I'm gonna hafta send some people over here to read it.