Friday, September 05, 2008

Update on the Palin smears -- and one NON-smear

It's worse than I thought. I cannot believe that people I once considered politically sympatico are resorting to such disgusting smear tactics.

The photo displayed here (on the left) is a hoax which some on the left have circulated as true. The original of this image, and the full story of how it came to be, is here. I don't know how many people have swimming pools in Alaska, but I strongly suspect that Sarah Palin doesn't have that kind of cellulite.

Bill Maher accused Palin of running up a $22 million dollar deficit during her tenure as Mayor of Wasilla. The City's documents are here. I just took a look at the numbers for 2003 (the first year after Palin left office), and the balance sheet speaks of a surplus. Either the newly-elected Mayor Dianne Keller worked an amazing feat of financial magic, or Maher was misinformed.

The Obots have put together a number of fake web sites designed to promote anti-Palin memes.

Here is a site which purportedly belongs to Britol Palin's boyfriend. After exposure as a hoax, the website's perpetrators quickly added a message proclaiming "This is a parody." Look at the posts and you'll see no attempts at humor. This blog was meant to deceive.

A fake "Alaska Independence Party" site was here until earlier today.

A recently-removed pdf file distributed by Democrats revealed Sarah Palin's Social Security number and exact home address.

The Obots have painted Palin as intolerant of gays, even though her position on gay marriage exactly mirrors Barack Obama's most recent stance. I've seen no evidence that she has tried to implement Dominionist theology during her time in the governor's chair. At any rate, dare an Obama supporter critique Palin's choice of pastors?

The Huffington Post is now posting hate diatribes against Piper Palin, who is all of six. Recall that moment during the speech when the little girl licked her fingers and patted down the baby's hair? Millions of normal people went "Awwwww..." But hard-core Obots aren't normal:
Totally creepy. Hasn't she been taught not to lick her hands? And to put it on her baby brother...eewww...makes me cringe. Needs more home training - nothing cute about this no matter howthey change to spin it. Disgusting...
I agree. This is probably a result of HOME SCHOOLING by her mom. She can't train her own children, how can she lead a country!!!!!!

1. Pregnant + an Alcoholic
2. Lacks home training
In light of the above examples of dirty pool, some of you may be surprised to learn that a widely-circulated letter criticizing Sarah Palin is real, even though many people pegged it as a fake. The erudition of the text struck many as suspicious.

Anne Kilkenny knew Palin during her days as mayor of Wasilla. I just spoke with her husband Ray, who struck me as a very nice guy. (I was surprised to learn that he and I used to live in the same L.A. suburb.) Yes, there really is an Anne Kilkenny -- and she did not intend the letter for the public. It was distributed to a handful of friends, one of whom asked permission to send it to another friend -- and within hours, it entered millions of cyber mailboxes. Ray says Anne said some things that she might have rephrased had she known that the missive would reach a large audience.

The letter has already been subjected to variants. The most accurate version is here.

Anne was graduated from UC Berkeley in 1971 -- which explains the high quality of her writing. Some of her criticisms strike me as fair -- for example, I think that it has been well-established (thank you, Bob Somerby; you've made your point) that Palin opposed the "bridge to nowhere" only after she heard the entire nation laughing at it. Some of Kilkenny's critiques seem to arise from a simple clash of personalities. Example:
During her 6 years as Mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over 33%. During those same 6 years the amount of taxes collected by the City increased by 38%. This was during a period of low inflation (1996-2002). She reduced progressive property taxes and increased a regressive sales tax which taxed even food. The tax cuts that she promoted benefited large corporate property owners way more than they benefited residents.
What is left out here is the fact that the city doubled in population. (It's a suburb of Anchorage.) The difference between expenditures and revenues speaks to me of black ink, not red. The town doubled in size but, according to Kilkenny, revenues grew by 38%. Not such a terrible record.

Kilkenny complains that taxes were refunded directly to the taxpayers instead of being invested in renewable energy. I'm a strong proponent of renewable energy, but I am not sure that this is a problem solvable by an Anchorage suburb. And I’m fairly sure that Palin's choice will play well with moderate to conservative voters. This is, in short, a disagreement based on differing weltanschauungs; it is not an accusation of chicanery.

I certainly do not approve of regressive taxation. But a sales tax is hardly a subject that any Obama voter will want to bring up. Chicago has the highest (and most regressive) sales taxes in the country, in order to pay for all of the corruption overseen by Blagojevich, Daley, Tony Rezko and Barack Obama.

As for the "arrogance" charge -- for all I know, this may be true. But who among the arrogant can compete with Barack Obama, the man who has never apologized for saying that he barely knew Tony Rezko?

Added note: Not long ago, all the progs seemed horrified when cops used a taser on a loudmouthed attention-seeker who disrupted a speech by John Kerry. (Of course, prog assholes hate Kerry almost as much as they hate those awful, awful Clintons.) Have ya noticed how these same progs seem perfectly happy to leap to the defense of an Alaskan state trooper who tazed an 11-year-old kid?

You can't say progressives don't have standards. Plural. As in double.

16 comments:

Citizen K said...

I posted the links re Anne Kilkenny on riverdaughter's blog in response to Gary's post, and they deleted them. Glad to see that you've posted the info here. This race gets weirder and weirder. I really have no idea who the new POTUS will be.

Anonymous said...

The fake pic is supposed to look fake. Remember hyperealism with paints? This is the New Yorker cover before the New Yorker gets to do it. But it's not funny if you have to explain it.

If there's an election between those two tickets, who do predict to win?

After two years what will it be like? After four years?

Dimitri

Joseph Cannon said...

Oh, nice try.

As the lady said in "The Exorcist": "Why you do this to me, Dimmy?"

Levi Johnston said...

Nice try, making up facts to trigger emotion in your blog readers against tactics used by left-wing nuts. Unfortunately, I lack a wing. I kindly request you, and readers of your blog reread the disclosure on my page (especially the response at the bottom) in response to your lie. Also, consider other half-truths the author may or may not have made to trigger emotion in you.

http://www.levijohnston.com/Blog/Disclosure/

Anonymous said...

that photo was sent to me by my semi red neck friend from arizona the day of the announcement. she loved it. in all fairness i think it was made by a fan of palins or some redstate/freepers generated origin, and plays to her base.

i don't think anyone thinks it's real.

Anna Belle said...

Holy Crap, Joseph, you're on FIRE with these last few posts. BTW, your first link in this post is dead. They've pulled the article. But you can find similar info here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charlotte-hilton-andersen/sarah-palin-bikini-pictur_b_123234.html

Yes, I do feel icky linking to HuffPo. It's not a HuffPo source, though. It's in their community blogging section. It may be gone before I finish posting...

Thanks for the doing the research on the Anne Kilkenny story.

Anonymous said...

citizen K, I deleted you because you are a troll. as for the letter, I never claimed it was fake, only speculated that it was either fake, or that Kilkenny is a shill or a tool. In any case the letter is clearly propaganda. It has no informational value and is full of misleading statements, no matter how erudite they appear.

For example she says

" During her 6 years as Mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over 33%. During those same 6 years the amount of taxes collected by the City increased by 38%"

Well that seems awful until you realize that the growth of this town was explosive, and that it nearly doubled in poopulation in 10years.

Testimonials are some of the most common forms of propaganda, and they are most effective if they are of a first hand nature. the fact that Kilkenny "compliments" Palin is further proof. It makes the letter appear "fair" and even handed.

If this letter is truly genuine, how is the rapid circulation among the most hatefilled "progressive" blogs explained? it was surely a coordinated effort. Have you noticed that the blog "mudflats" on wordpress which didn't even exist until a month or so ago is all of a sudden the biggest blog on wordpress? And they're just pumping out smear after smear of Palin. Seems like they were ready to go with the smear campaign, and this "letter" was just the beginning. The other letter, from John Smit, IS clearly fake, imo.

Joseph Cannon said...

To answer a few points...

1. "Levi" -- you're not one-tenth as clever as you think you are, and you aren't kidding anyone.

2. The fake pic is done with care. I think it was meant to be taken as real.

3. Judging from internal evidence, the obnoxious Huff thread was being edited and censored even as I stumbled across it. I don't think at Arianna suddenly grew a conscience (I have NEVER trusted her), but I do think that she is learning the pitfalls of making a bad impression.

4. gary, as you may have noted, I myself mentioned the bit about the town's growth. Once you factor that in, Palin looks less like a big spender and more like a model of fiscal restraint.

(I've received a number of differing reports as to the exact increase in population, but all of them agree that the population increase exceeded the rate of increase of town revenues or expenditures.)

But I think you are being a bit silly to scry some conspiracy here.

From a number of clues in my conversation, I gathered that Anne and her husband are pretty firmly on the left. "Not that there's anything wrong with that," as they say. The same could be said about yours truly, until recently -- that is, until the progs started screaming eliminationist rhetoric at anyone who would not support the Lightbringer.

I could list the conversational clues that led me to this assessment, but doing so might get a bit personal. (The fact that Anne refers to her fellow Alaskans as "rednecks" is the most obvious clue.)

My assessment of Anne is this: We have a well-educated, very liberal, very political person who moves up to Alaska and tries to fit in with...well, with the kind of people one does NOT normally run into in Berkeley. It's a classic "Northern Exposure" situation.

(Why does she move there? Family connections, perhaps. There are other Kilkennys in Anchorage.)

She meets Sarah Palin, who is definitely NOT a "Berkeley" type. Ten years ago, Palin is in her early 30s and is little too confident. She works hard, but she also doesn't realize that some things have perhaps come a bit too easily to her. (This is often the case with attractive women.) She hasn't learned about compromise. She has probably never before met someone educated at a place like UC Berkeley. And she's religious.

Cue the "Odd Couple" music. Anne and Sarah simply don't get along.

A decade passes, and Palin learns a few life lessons. She learns how to deal with differing types of people. She's still religious, but doesn't wear her faith on her sleeve as she might have. She chooses quieter, less demonstrative church.

But Anne remembers her when. And still does not like her.

(Frankly, I might have disliked Palin if I had met her at that time.)

As for the distribution of the letter -- Anne clearly states that it was NOT supposed to go far. Just a small circle of friends. One of those friends is a guy named "Brad" who asks if he can share it with someone he knows. Anne finds out only later that Brad put the damn thing on an email list sent out to 800 people.

From there, it obviously went onto other lists. It went viral.

No need to see any conspiracy, gary. Shit happens.

Anonymous said...

Joseph- I think you might be getting a bit overly defensive here- that picture was discussed on Jay Leno as a fake- jokes and laughs were made. I don't think it can get much more obvious than that. The only folks that would take it for a genuine photo are probably proud NRA members looking for a promo op with her.
Furthermore, this is not anything new on the internet. You can't really take this anymore serious than the ones out there of Obama-and you know there are plenty of those too.
As far as Kilkenny's email... you should confront this site on your claims because they stated they had her direct permission to publish it on their site:

About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla

A suburban Anchorage homemaker and activist — who once did battle with the Alaska governor when Palin was mayor — recounts what she knows of Palin's history.

By Anne Kilkenny

Editor's note: The writer is a homemaker and education advocate in Wasilla, Alaska. Late last week, Anne Kilkenny penned an e-mail for her friends about vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, whom she personally knows, that has since circulated across comment forums and blogs nationwide. Here is her e-mail in its entirety, posted with her permission.

http://www.crosscut.com/politics-government/17341

This is not a small blog posting her email for traffic. It is a genuine news source in Seattle. I am sure they would get her permission before posting it.

Anonymous said...

Hyperrealism? Oy. It's a shop done by a certain "anonymous" forum who, shockingly, does this stuff. It's the best of their impromptu contest, hence the one that's going to make the rounds.

But really, some vast conspiracy? It's a bunch of 15-30 year old dudes on a bloody forum doing it for fun.

Anonymous said...

Last night I caught two minutes of Anderson Cooper (as I was loading a DVD of the 1961 classic "The Hustler" with Paul Newman and Jackie Gleason). In those two minutes I heard Ed Rollins say that Nixon said that "you don't play down to the ticket" or something like that. He went on to explain that Nixon meant that people shouldn't have spent so much time attacking his vice presidential running mate Spiro Agnew, instead they should have spent more time attacking him, the guy who was actually running for president. And we remember who won that one.
BTW Joseph, I think pretty women often have a harder time actually, because everyone thinks they get everything more easily and therefore no one wants to help them, the women are jealous and the men don't want to look stupid.

Joseph Cannon said...

About the published version of the email: I'd have given permission as well. No point in trying to shove toothpaste back into the tube.

kitty, I think I will do a weekend post about whether prettiness is an asset or a drawback to women, career-wise. I think you make a good point.

Citizen K said...

garychapelhill, I looked for an email address for you, but nada. So (with apologies to Joe for posting it here) all I can say to your baseless "troll" claim is, you're so wrong. Before kos deleted "The Palin pregnancy" blogger post, I posted:
"Utterly repulsive! (1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:Andrys
Haven't you learned? Wasn't it enough to split the party with the baseless, petty, sexist, stupid and undemocratic posts you made as 'progressives'? Think of it - we only need to say that McBush made a token move, a purely political move. Had Clinton been the nominee for president or Obama's choice as vice president, McBush would have made another political choice. Had Obama picked Richardson, we would have seen another political move. End of story. Get off the vagina. This type of medieval speculation is beneath anyone calling themselves a progressive. You blew it with Clinton slander and gossip and now you're showing just how low class you can be against this woman. Enough"
Now, the appearance of Palin was a wakeup call to me. I can't vote for a Republican at the top of the ticket. If that makes me a troll, maybe you should pass me some koolaid. I simply think you're doing PUMA a disservice and potentially alienating undecides Democrats with your hasty censorship. I've sent around links to riverdaughter's blog to friends who think that PUMAs are only pissed off Hillary supporters. RD's post last week especially showed just what PUMAs are up to, and I can get behind that. I can't get behind the lock-step 'our opinion or no opinion' that I'm reading these days. So, in the meantime:
Hillary 2012

davis,br said...

Anne Kilkenny probably has a particular axe to grind with Palin. My speculations are based upon an article that mentions her in the Anchorage Daily News.

It appears that Kilkenny’s ticked because the governor/legislature didn’t allocate more money to a custodial wages labor dispute (or crisis) that was occurring in a Wasilla school district.

From the Anchorage Daily News, Mar 3 2006

Mat-Su School Board votes to privatize custodial jobs
Move will save $1.6 million, but some staff will see large pay cuts.

In all, the board heard more than three hours of public testimony against outsourcing. Many urged the School Board to lobby the borough Assembly and the state for more money instead.

‘With a $1.2 billion surplus in their budget, (the state) should be able to do more for us,’ said Wasilla resident Anne Kilkenny.”

The woman apparently has a few issues with Gov. Palin; but it ain't too hard to discern this one, and it's in the public record.

And they probably do go way back: it can get really, really vicious in small towns, especially when it comes to politics. It ain’t always white doves, butterflies, and rainbows out in the hustings.

Anonymous said...

I think that whether prettiness plays a role in career success depends on who is doing the hiring. Personally, I've found that female executives are much more likely than men in similar positions to cut other women off at the knees, though many would disagree. There is much anectodal evidence to support either view. The only thing I have clearly concluded is that the bar rests much higher for one half of the population that it does for the other half.

Kim in PA

Anonymous said...

davis- actually Kilkenny has taken issue with Palin's policies for quite some time (about 12 years)- she states this in her email.:

Fourth, she has hated me since back in 1996, when I was one of the 100
or so people who rallied to support the City Librarian against Sarah’s
attempt at censorship.


But from what I can see in that article you linked, she should have issue with the governor's policies.
And I think Alaska should return the bridge to nowhere funds--afterall the federal highway fund is broke now.
But regardless of all that- Your article had nothing to do with Palin- she hadn't been elected yet. This policy was put into place before Palin was elected as governor. It was another administration/governor that had Kilkenny speaking out along with over 300 other people in public forum.

But these type of policies are put into place because Alaskans don't even pay tax sales and income tax-But Palin's policies merely mask problems rather than resolve them...it is no wonder she kept all the bridge to nowhere money:


http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/05/AR2008090503525.html

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5izcMPCCNGsjEswZTr168n8oMj5yg