Sunday, December 30, 2007

EDWARDS SURGES AHEAD IN IOWA!

John Edwards has moved into first place in Iowa!

All right, so he's ahead by a statistically insignificant single point -- 24%, compared to Clinton and Obama, who have 23% and 22% respectively.

And I must also confess that the McClatchy/MSNBC results are not matched by other surveys. The ARG poll puts Clinton ahead of Edwards, 31% to 24%.

I don't care. Look: These are not happy times for me, so I intend to take joy whenever the occasion for joy presents itself. Edwards is winning! That's my message and I will continue to shout it until the next poll comes along.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Joy of the Lord is my strength

Anonymous said...

As we said earlier in the month, the Kucinich remark that he is "thinking about" reaching across the aisle to Republican Paul, is no more (or less) than an extraordinary, ie, Herculean and almost desperate effort to quickly secure what lifeboats are left aboard the good ship Liberty, as she slowly sinks into the muddy and polluted Potomac. The blasts from the Fascist torpedoes have taken their intended toll.
Now we are on the cusp at the fulcrum and tipping point of our destiny and we will witness the kind of rousing debate that kick started this nation over two hundred and thirty five years ago.
The Spirit of Liberty ( and Prophecy) is riding again, just in the nick of time. See Him coming just over the horizon? A rider on a pure white horse is galloping toward US, pell mell, waving His dazzling sword of Justice in one hand and in the other, the reins and our blood bought and fiercely fought Constitution.

Hallelujah Jah, and Jai Ram,

(“Praise God” for all you Gringos)

As you may have noticed Cannon, next door at BuzzFlash this war buleting.

"I'm an American before I'm a Republican," said former senator John Danforth (Mo.). He is unimpressed with his party's presidential candidates. (By Craig Sands For The Washington Post)

New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, a potential independent candidate for president, has scheduled a meeting next week with a dozen leading Democrats and Republicans, who will join him in challenging the major-party contenders to spell out their plans for forming a "government of national unity" to end the gridlock in Washington.

Those who will be at the Jan. 7 session at the University of Oklahoma say that if the likely nominees of the two parties do not pledge to "go beyond tokenism" in building an administration that seeks national consensus, they will be prepared to back Bloomberg or someone else in a third-party campaign for president.

Conveners of the meeting include such prominent Democrats as former senators Sam Nunn (Ga.), Charles S. Robb (Va.) and David L. Boren (Okla.), and former presidential candidate Gary Hart. Republican organizers include Sen. Chuck Hagel (Neb.), former party chairman Bill Brock, former senator John Danforth (Mo.) and former New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman.

Boren, who will host the meeting at the university, where he is president, said: "It is not a gathering to urge any one person to run for president or to say there necessarily ought to be an independent option. But if we don't see a refocusing of the campaign on a bipartisan approach, I would feel I would want to encourage an independent candidacy."

The list of acceptances suggests that the group could muster the financial and political firepower to make the threat of such a candidacy real. Others who have indicated that they plan to attend the one-day session include William S. Cohen, a former Republican senator from Maine and defense secretary in the Clinton administration; Alan Dixon, a former Democratic senator from Illinois; Bob Graham, a former Democratic senator from Florida; Jim Leach, a former Republican congressman from Iowa; Susan Eisenhower, a political consultant and granddaughter of former president Dwight D. Eisenhower; David Abshire, president of the Center for the Study of the Presidency; and Edward Perkins, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Bloomberg, a former Democrat who was elected mayor of New York as a Republican, left the GOP this past summer to become an independent. While disclaiming any plan to run for president in 2008, he has continued to fuel speculation by traveling widely and speaking out on both domestic and international issues. The mayor, a billionaire many times over, presumably could self-finance even a late-starting candidacy.
ad_icon

"As mayor, he has seen far too often how hyperpartisanship in Washington has gotten in the way of making progress on a host of issues," said Bloomberg's press secretary, Stu Loeser. "He looks forward to sitting down and discussing this with other leaders."

Until plans for this meeting were disclosed, the most concrete public move toward any kind of independent candidacy was by Unity08, a group planning an online nominating convention to pick either an independent candidate or a ticket combining a Republican and a Democrat. The sponsors, an eclectic mix of consultants who have worked for candidates including Jimmy Carter (D) and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), have not aligned with a specific prospect.

Now, some people with high-level political and governmental credentials are moving to put muscle behind the effort. A letter from Nunn and Boren sent to those attending the Jan. 7 session said that "our political system is, at the least, badly bent and many are concluding that it is broken at a time where America must lead boldly at home and abroad. Partisan polarization is preventing us from uniting to meet the challenges that we must face if we are to prevent further erosion in America's power of leadership and example."

At the session, Boren said, participants will try to draft a statement on such issues as the need to "rebuild and reconfigure our military forces," nuclear proliferation and terrorism, and restoring U.S. credibility in the world.

"Today, we are a house divided," the letter said. "We believe that the next president must be able to call for a unity of effort by choosing the best talent available -- without regard to political party -- to help lead our nation."

Boren said he and Nunn, who often collaborated when they headed the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees, respectively, issued invitations to other moderates with whom they had served, and found that almost everyone was willing to come.

"Our hope is that the candidates will respond with their own specific ideas about how to pull the country together, not just aim at getting out their own polarized base," Boren said. "But we will have a couple months before the nominees will be known, and we can judge in that time what their response will be."

Boren said the meeting is being announced in advance of Thursday's Iowa caucuses "because we don't want anyone to think this was a response to any particular candidate or candidates." He said the nation needs a "government of national unity" to overcome its partisan divisions in a time of national challenge he likened to that faced by Great Britain during World War II.

"Electing a president based solely on the platform or promises of one party is not adequate for this time," Boren said. "Until you end the polarization and have bipartisanship, nothing else matters, because one party simply will block the other from acting."

Danforth said he remains a Republican but finds little cause for optimism among the current GOP candidates. "My party is appealing to a real meanness," he said in an interview, "and an irresponsible sense of machismo in foreign policy. I hope it will be less extreme, but I'm an American before I'm a Republican." Danforth has also written critically about the impact of religious conservatives on the Republican Party.

Cohen said his emphasis will be on the issues rather than on a candidacy, adding that he and Nunn will co-sponsor a series of "dialogues" on key topics, aiming to build planks for a possible consensus platform for the next president.

"The important goal all of us share," Cohen said, "is to get government back to the center."

Nunn, for his part, described Bloomberg as "an enormously capable man" but said: "I've made no decision who I'm going to support. Most of us hope to shape the Republican or Democratic side's response, but who knows where this is going to go? I think the country's at the tipping point, and it's going to take a lot more understanding by the electorate for anybody to be able to lead."

This folks is what we can call "a miracle"

Joseph Cannon said...

I'm letting the above post stay even though I think atlas is an asshole and I wish he'd find some other blog. But the Bloomberg menace is quite real.

Paul has nothing to do with "the good ship Liberty." Read "The Shock Doctrine." Laissez Faire, which Paul espouses, is as big a killer as Marxism.

AitchD said...

What a greedy bunch of hasbeens on that list! What sort of world did they expect to find after their own crucial neglect and pawning off of Alexander the Great's former empire onto the next generation (us)? They didn't impeach and remove Reagan when they should have; G.H.W. Bush also. It must be pretty serious, whatever all those good old boys are up to. They know two things they're not telling us. One of them is that they're scared shitless, and the other is why they're so scared.