A few items from other blogs:
Marcy Wheeler has a fascinating look at the ever-mysterious
airstrike in Syria. Some say the world came
thisclose to war on that day. A rather outlandish Al Jazeera piece said that the airstrike was more an American thing than an Israeli thing.
Larisa Alexandrovna draws our attention to a new piece by
Karl Rove, who crows about the low poll numbers enjoyed by this Congress. There are those of us who suspect that Rove has had a hand in engineering those low numbers...
Rove chides the Dems thus: "Their bright campaign promises are unfulfilled." He doesn't mention that the Iraq pull-out would have begun on October 1 if Bush had not vetoed the idea; neither does he mention the Republican filibuster.
He also spanks the Dems for -- get this -- not practicing fiscal discipline. This, from the chief political strategist in the 2000-2006 period, during which time Rove sold a political agenda that turned a budget surplus to an economy-wrecking deficit.
It's classic Rove: Attack the enemy's strength; accuse the other guy of doing what
you are doing. His public statements always give one a good idea of what he's up to behind the scenes.
The strategy may be working. Support for Iraq has ticked up, and Bush's poll numbers have risen (per Rasmussen) to 38%.
Mckinney, the new Nader: A
TPM reader complains...
I tried to engage people at firedoglake about Cynthia Mckinney running for president as a Green in '08, and was treated as if I were a republican for even mentioning it.
Because you
are a Republican, objectively speaking. And so is McKinney.
I'm sure McKinney has her rationalizations for her atrocious decision (she has formed an exploratory committee), which could result in a Giuliani victory, which would result in lots of Iranians getting nuked to protect
her precious progressive purity. Rationalization springs eternal. Y'see, a re-run of the Clinton years would be just
so fucking awful that we should gladly sacrifice the lives of millions in order to avoid such a ghastly fate.