Two posts down, after the Kucinich impeachment resolution was referred to the Judiciary Committee, I predicted that the "progressive" Conyers-haters would show up a few hours later.
And here they are!But here's the interesting news. John Conyers (or, as some pseudo-progressives would have it, John "Neo-CONyers") voted
against tabling the measure. And he voted
for referral to his committee.
Intriguing. In light of the above, consider
this sphinx-like statement:
House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), agreed that it was not in Pelosi's interests to advance the articles of impeachment. "If she were to let this thing out of the box, considering the number of legislative issues we have pending ... it could create a split that could affect our productivity for the rest of the Congress," Conyers told Fox News.
As the dust settles, we can see more clearly why the Republicans didn't want to table the motion. Any Dem in a conservative district who voted in favor of the resolution during what some are pleased to call wartime would be vulnerable. Any Dem who voted against would incur the wrath of the bloggers. Since, under present circumstances, Cheney stands no chance of being removed from office, the situation was win-win for the Republicans.
On the other hand, if the Judiciary Committee were to investigate, circumstances could change.