Tuesday, September 11, 2007

A spooked-up ABC journalist...?

Laura Rozen is covering the strange case of Alexis Debat, the rather young ABC News journalist, "terror expert" and business consultant from France, whose background and bona fides have come into question.

The main questioner is Pascal Riché, who writes here about a Debat "interview" with Barack Obama, with whom Debat never actually spoke. Debat later claimed, weakly, to have conducted the interview through an intermediary, although the go-between remains unidentified.

The Riché piece notes that Debat has made some very large claims about his background:
Once he claimed to our colleague Guillemette Faure, a reporter for Le Figaro, that he got his PhD in political science from Edenvale University, in Great Britain, a university which proved to be a fraud.
His resume at the Nixon Center (where Debat is a "Senior Fellow") claims that Debat received a PhD from the Sorbonne in 1999. But according to Riché,
"He manufactured his doctorate. I had the document which he manufactured in my hands," says André Kaspi, a professor of North American history at the Sorbonne. Debat does not deny a "conflict" with the Sorbonne, but refuses to elaborate.
Also:
During the 2005 civil unrest in French suburbs, Debat appeared on television with the title "ex-social worker." He said he worked for the foundation "Agir contre l'exclusion." Other times, he claimed to have served as a French commando, tracking Serb soldiers in the former Yugoslavia.
Debat's resume states that "Alexis occupied various positions in the French government, first as an analyst on the Counter-Terrorism Coordinating Committee, then as a senior desk officer for the Ministry of Defense." According to Riché, the French government will confirm only that "he did hold a desk job for a few months."

Debat has launched a counterattack. Regarding the Edenvale University claim, he writes that he never asserted a connection with that institution, and that "None of the biographies accessible online mention this." His wording sidesteps the question of whether he made such a claim to a reporter for Le Figaro.

In his response, Debat does not really address the dispute over his claimed work for the French government. However, he does insist that he received a doctorate from the Sorbonne and that his thesis is listed here. A check of that site reveals that the thesis director was the afore-mentioned André Kaspi, who now claims that Debat concocted his doctorate. Debat, for his part, insists that Kaspi was not his thesis director. At this time, I have no idea what to make of these claims and counter-claims.

But I do note with great interest the title of that thesis: C.I.A. et perceptions de sécurité aux Etats-Unis, 1947-1962.

Alexis Debat does not appear to be a mere fake journalist of the Stephen Glass variety, and he's not just another neocon bullshit spewer. The neocons despise the CIA, while Debat is clearly enamored of the Agency. For the clearest view of his mind-set, see his piece here, written in response to the release of the congressional report on 9/11.

His main proposal: The CIA should be given far more authority and power within the American intelligence community.
The CIA has been compelled to perform its duties without the full authority it needed, against the will of its rivals (the military, the FBI, the State Department), and, most importantly, beyond the dialectic that made the agency both the protector (by its mission) and the destructor (by its institutional status) of the American republic.
Despite dozens of "intelligence failures", every President since Harry S Truman has consciously chosen to back down from efforts to centralize the intelligence community, to the detriment of the nation's security. Instead of being empowered with its original functions of "lead integrator", the CIA has been kept as an anomaly and left to compete with-and duplicate the work of-the FBI, the State Department and the various intelligence arms of the Department of Defense.
The biography attached to this piece reveals that "Dr. Debat is at work on the largest manuscript ever written on the history of the Central Intelligence Agency, to be published next year in Europe and the United States." I doubt that Debat would have access to the materials necessary for such a work unless the Agency considered him "on the square."

(Incidentally, the same short bio also avers that Debat was "Director of the Scientific Committee for the Institut Montaigne (Paris)," even though he tells a rather different story in his response to the accusations against him.)

So who is Alexis Debat? His apparent institutional allegiance to the CIA naturally leads the observer to suspect a long-standing relationship with the Company. While researching this story, my thoughts drifted back to Philippe de Vosjoli, the French spook who was more-or-less "recruited" for American intelligence by the CIA's infamous James Jesus Angleton. Alfred Hitchchock's worst movie, Topaz, tells a fictionalized version of this story; John Forsythe plays Angleton.

I don't know who Debat really is. But I'd like to learn more. The positioning of spooks within the journalistic community is a very serious matter.

Note: If you came here via Reddit or Buzzflash, you'll want to read the update, which continues to explore this thesis. Go here.

9 comments:

Hyperman said...

Maybe Operation Mockingbird is still active. He's a French version of Michael Ledeen :)

Anonymous said...

I've been wondering about the Nixon Center of late. Nixon's family kept hold of his library and papers up through July 2007, when they *finally* decided to submit and become part of the Archives system.

Still, the Nixon Center is funded (directly) through the nonprofit Richard M Nixon Birthplace and Library Foundation. Running a think tank is a significant expense - and I can only wonder about the illicit flows of money that may come through the Nixon Center.

Joseph Cannon said...

"Running a think tank is a significant expense - and I can only wonder about the illicit flows of money that may come through the Nixon Center."

That's an interesting point, anon. I've been to that library, and it's pretty clear that they're not making their money from sales in the gift center.

There's a large, opulent fountain in front of the library. If you get close to it, you'll see a small sign identifying it as a present from Ryoichi Sasakawa, a Japanese magnate who got his start in organized crime.

Joseph Trento's "Prelude to Terror" has a good story about Nixon's involvement with seedy wheeling and dealing in his post-presidential career. That money was probably laundered through the Center.

Anonymous said...

Thanks!

Unfortunately the Nixon Home and Library is only obliged to list the top 4 highest paid individuals - and Debat is not among them.

The Nixon Center publishes a magazine called "The National Interest." For some reason, TNI was a 100% wholly owned incorporated division of the Nixon Center up till 2005, when they brought it back in house.

It's quite a shell game they're running!

Anonymous said...

I admit!
That I was too young back in the day...of Nixon...or Johnson.
I admit that I am new to the political scene (20 some odd years of observing, reading and contemplating).
But, for the love of God.... there is a new war being sold under the same old label, with the same propoganda, inline with with the same old lies!
Where is the outrage?
Where is the opositon?
And a year from now, who is going to have a 20/20 vision of reality?
Not Republicans!
Which Democrat is going to appologize for his vote (or lack of retreiveing his vote) for the disaster that will face America?
A spook on ABC?
The housing buble?
How many Repubs are closet gay?
How about if we can't win in Iraq, in what story book do we win against Iran?
How did Iran become the new boogyman?
Is Osama now so Passee that we need a new soft target?
Iran is no soft anything, so I hear.
Where is the outrage?
Here and eleswhere!
BTW
Fuck Kerry!
He deserved to lose!

Anonymous said...

Ryoichi Sasakawa? You mean the Yakuza leader, convicted war criminal, and self-proclaimed "world's richest fascist," who was also a key financial supporter of both the Unification Church and the World Anti-Communist League?

That Ryoichi Sasakawa?

Well, goddamn.

Joseph Cannon said...

Yeah, that one.

The fountain is very striking. You can see it here:

http://www.trainweb.org/chris/nixon2.JPG

Anonymous said...

Hmm, seems there's a Sasakawa Peace Foundation that's trying to come on all respectable and has fairly extensive US connections. Probably worth looking into -- but it's already 2 am, and I'm certainly not going to do anything with it tonight.

However, there are a couple of official pages here and here that make a decent starting point. Also an account of Sasakawa's career at VotaireNet, including a photo of him out jogging with Jimmy Carter.

And more here -- this last one gets far too deeply into the intricacies of Japanese politics to be easy going but probably is worth wading through. At any rate, it does tie Nixon in with a rather sedate version of the "Japanese gold" story, which is intriguing.

The ability of old fascists to pass in polite company never ceases to amaze. Makes me glad I've never been polite company myself.

Anonymous said...

This guy has probably been making up his anonymous sources for his entire career, all in the service of his own self-aggrandizement. That's my guess.

Yet it's only one small step from Debat's pure journalistic fraudulence to the half-baked suggestion on the part of Rozen that Debat is CIA. Think for just a minute, people. You ought to present actual evidence before you throw around innuendo, else you're a pretty poor journalist. I mean, without evidence, I could suggest that the author of this article is a plant of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, because her article tends to confirm and benefit their point of view...

That's obviously not the case, but unless you stick to hard facts and evidence, you can be lead anywhere.