Monday, August 20, 2007

More on Larry Kolb, "Overworld," Muhammad Ali, and Al Sharpton

A few posts down, I discussed Larry Kolb's book Overworld, which details his history with Adnan Khashoggi, Muhammad Ali, and the CIA. Espionage runs in the family: Kolb's father Lewis Kolb was, we are told, a senior counterintelligence officer operating out of the Philippines.

Frankly, I had come to believe that the family name was something other than Kolb, since no-one by that name appears in any CIA history known to me, and Google does not link to any independent source confirming that there once was a spy named Lewis Kolb. But son Larry assures me that the man did exist, and he has provided evidence to that effect. I reproduce, with permission, a photograph of Lewis Kolb, as well as a relevant section from a WWII-era document. (Kolb retains copyright on these images, so don't reproduce them without permission.)

Well, now I feel silly for ever suspecting that Ed Lansdale's kid became part of Muhammad Ali's posse.

Another correction: In my original post, I said that L. Fletcher Prouty had identified Lansdale as one of the three "mystery tramps" photographed in Dealey Plaza on you-know-which date. In fact, Prouty identified as Lansdale another man who seemed to be signaling the tramps while passing. Daniel Ellsberg, who also knew Lansdale well, disputes this idea.

The book contains all sort of juicy information. One tidbit I wanted to pass along here concerns Al Sharpton, who -- according to Overworld -- was forever trying to ingratiate himself into Ali's entourage.
Reverend Al was just Reverend Al. Around so much of the time, and usually so quiet you barely even noticed when he was there and when he wasn't.

Then one afternoon I was in the Soup Burg on Madison Avenue at 73rd...reading the sports section of New York Newsday I'd found on my stool when I sat down. And when I finished with the sports and flipped the paper over tot he front page, there was a big black-and-white photograph of Reverend Al looking shifty and a huge headline: THE MINISTER AND THE FEDS.

Under that, I read: "For the last five years, the Rev. Al Sharpton, Jr., one of the city's most vocal and visible black activists, has been secretly supplying federal law enforcement agencies with information on boxing promoter Don King, reputed organized crime leaders and black leaders and elected officials, according to sources. And in a two-hour, wide-ranging interview with New York Newsday, Sharpton, 33, said he carried concealed microphones in briefcases and accompanied undercover federal agents wearing body recorders to meetings with various subjects of federal investigations. He also allowed the U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of New York to install a tapped telephone in his Brooklyn home."

Al Fuckin' Sharpton, I thought in surprise as I stared into his face. I should've known. Al Sharpton! Muhammad had always said the government had someone spying on him or, as he liked to put it, that there was a "nigger in the woodpile."
Not exactly the way I'd phrase it. But I do think this story belongs on the internet record somewhere, since Wikipedia's entry on Sharpton makes no mention of this Newsday interview. Kolb goes on to say that the feds had compromised Sharpton during a cocaine bust, which Sharpton claims was a set-up.

Kolb does not mention when he first disclosed his CIA connection to Ali -- a connection which puts Sharpton's "spying" into perspective. Ali must have learned about Kolb's history at some point. A later episode in the book pictures Ali and Kolb receiving a direct request from (then) Vice President George H.W. Bush to participate in efforts to free the hostages in Lebanon -- which Ali went on to do, at no small personal risk. Unfortunately, he was able to secure the release of but one hostage.

Interestingly, this passage of Kolb's book portrays the elder Bush as the real power within the Reagan administration, much as Cheney seems to be the real power in the current administration.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Interestingly, this passage of Kolb's book portrays the elder Bush as the real power within the Reagan administration,"

No. Really?? 41 was the power behind Ronny? Say it ain't so, Joe. I don't wanna piss u off or anything, but didn't 43's brother Neil have to cance his April Fools dinner with John Hinckley Jr's brother Scott back in 1981? GHWB couldn't take even 70 days of being 2nd in charge (imonsho)

Anonymous said...

For that matter, I think that to the extent that there is a "power behind the throne" in the current administration, it's George H. W. Bush, rather than Dick Cheney.

My personal opinion:

1)don't believe the hype. If George H. W. Bush actually disagreed with #1 Son on the desirability of invading Iraq, #1 Son would not have invaded Iraq. The George Sr.-James Baker-Brent Scowcroft thing is simply Show Business bet hedging. There's no downside to that pose, since the invasion is an accomplished fact. And these are people very well-versed in the politics of the fait accompli. Seven ways from Sunday.

2) Cheney isn't so much the Shadow President as he is the Bad Cop. George W. Bush is, well, the Good Cop. Compared to Dick Cheney, anyway. We're talking Image here, Perception Management. More Show Business. Asserting that Cheney is the Shadow President implicitly casts George W. Bush in the role of the affable but hapless, well-intentioned bumbler. Cheney gets to be the Big Bad Villain- and, furthermore, the Big Bad Villain next in line for the Presidency, a factor to be reckoned with that helps keep the Impeachment of Bush at bay. I think that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney share mutual agreement about almost every policy that actually gets enacted by the Bush administration, especially in foreign policy.

Anonymous said...

Robert Reed's opinion is interesting, but goes against all of the evidence extant. There has been a great orchestration of the appearance of a fundamental split between father and son, with W saying he doesn't discuss policy with his old man (seeking advice from a higher father, doncha know).

If it's been an elaborate ruse, to divert attention from GHWB's puppet strings, it's been a good one, and quite convincing, as in particular, the CIA, long associated with GHWB, has been an prominent opponent against W.

I'd say, just as Reagan was an outsider from the elite consensus represented by GHWB and the Trilaterals, so too is W an outlier (out-lier?) from the foreign policy establishment.

sofla

Anonymous said...

Bush Sr.'s guys were, to all appearances, genuinely trying to head off the Iraq War in August 2002 -- it's not just an after-the-fact pose. Scowcroft, Baker, Brzezinski and other were all furiously writing op-eds and appearing on television to speak out against it. (See CooperativeResearch.)

That's one of the big reasons they had to trot out the Judy Miller aluminum tubes story in early September. It may even by why they resorted to the obviously flimsy Niger forgeries. There really was a genuine conflict, and the Cheney gang was fighting back.

Anonymous said...

Another personal opinion: this hasn't been George W. Bush's CIA, or Allen Dulles' CIA, for quite some time now.

Bear in mind also that the Iran-Contra resupply program/ arms & drugs pipeline of the 1980s wasn't run down the line through the CIA out of Langley, either. For one thing, covert operations that were run out of Foggy Bottom or Langley have a pretty unsuccessful track record, something that was fairly obvious by about the mid-1970s.

The Contra resupply effort was put together by DCI William Casey and George H. W. Bush, certainly, and it included CIA officers, but it was compartmentalized through a handful of people.

Furthermore, the CIA stations in Central America were specifically directed in writing to not follow up on any illegal drug allegations by William French Smith- Ronald Reagan's first attorney general ( and the man who bankrolled Reagan's entry into electoral politics, according to the book Reagan's Ruling Class: Portraits of the President's Top 100 Officials. ) fwiw, French departed soon after, to be replaced by Ediwn Meese, the name that most people recall when they think of "Reagan's attorney general."

The 1980s Iran-Contra resupply program was more accurately an operation under the aegis of the National Security Council (NSC) and the Terrorist Incident Working Group (TIWG)- to the extent that such organizational names or acronyms mean anything, that is. For the most part, they're irrelevant. The"CIA" or the "NSC" might as well be the USDA. And there were also many foreign nationals involved in the operation. An incomplete list: Argentines, Saudis, Israelis, Hondurans... The only names that matter are the actual people involved in a given covert operation (or clandestine parapolitical crime), as associated with the extent of their involvement.

I think it's important to grasp the idea that- notwithstanding the moniker- the same "Central Intelligence Agency" can contain skeptics, dissidents, whistleblowers- and personnel involved in secret rendition kidnappings, torture professionals, and cut-outs to drug and arms trafficking organizations and provocateur networks. In a world of hierarchical bureaucracy and compartmentalized specialization, parallel networks are the norm, not the exception. Re-read your Max Weber.

It's complicated- but better honest complexity than the falsity of oversimplified inaccuracy.

gary said...

FYI, there is a thread about this post on the JFK Education Forum:

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=10779