Thursday, March 29, 2007

The DOJ and the vote game

All praise unto Larisa Alexandrovna for turning our attention to this op-ed by Joseph D. Rich, chief of the voting section in the Justice Department's civil right division from 1999 to 2005. His subject goes beyond the politicization of U.S. Attorneys. He describes the Bush plan (which I'm sure is really the Rove plan) to use the Justice Department to insure election unfairness:
Over the last six years, this Justice Department has ignored the advice of its staff and skewed aspects of law enforcement in ways that clearly were intended to influence the outcome of elections.

It has notably shirked its legal responsibility to protect voting rights. From 2001 to 2006, no voting discrimination cases were brought on behalf of African American or Native American voters. U.S. attorneys were told instead to give priority to voter fraud cases, which, when coupled with the strong support for voter ID laws, indicated an intent to depress voter turnout in minority and poor communities.
And:
Missouri had one of the closest Senate races in the country last November, and a week before the election, Schlozman brought four voter fraud indictments against members of an organization representing poor and minority people. This blatantly contradicted the department's long-standing policy to wait until after an election to bring such indictments because a federal criminal investigation might affect the outcome of the vote. The timing of the Missouri indictments could not have made the administration's aims more transparent.

This administration is also politicizing the career staff of the Justice Department. Outright hostility to career employees who disagreed with the political appointees was evident early on. Seven career managers were removed in the civil rights division. I personally was ordered to change performance evaluations of several attorneys under my supervision. I was told to include critical comments about those whose recommendations ran counter to the political will of the administration and to improve evaluations of those who were politically favored.
We should ask Congress to expand their inquiries. The topic goes beyond the firing of the Eight. The larger issue is forcing the DOJ to enforce unfair elections.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I wondering again about what really happened to Jonathan Luna from Baltimore.

ViViDVeW said...

Great post.

Shows why the US Attorney scandal is more important that it would appear on face value. While the firing of US Attorneys for political reasons does not even rank on the scale of the Bush Administration’s improper use of executive powers, it illustrates like nothing before the SOP of the administration and the GOP as it exists today.

It can’t help but lead to wider implications like the ones raised here. Once people believe that the malfeasance of their government can be this pervasive, it’s impossible to not see through the glass house of lies that have built up over 6 years.