One must nod in agreement with the reader who observed that nothing major happens in this country without a few accompanying conspiracy theories. Such speculations have become so ubiquitous that the old "no-smoke-without-fire" axiom now possesses only limited usefulness.
And yet...perhaps we should continue to keep an eye on this rumor. Don't play Chicken Little, but don't play the role of the ostrich, either.
Yes, levees do break. Especially levees facing a Level 4 hurricane. Especially when those levees were designed to withstand only a Level 3 hurricane.
I wrote the previous post because I suspected that such a compilation might evince a genuinely intriguing piece of information. One respondent provided the following:
See the TalkingPointsMemo site's Timeline, for a link to a news article that cites a National Guard timeline. The NG Timeline places the rupture of the 17th Street Canal Flood Wall at 3 a.m. Monday, 8/29, three hours before the hurricane even made landfall. [A call to the Army Corps of Engineers at 5 a.m. Monday appears to confirm that account.]The Talking Points Memo timeline here does not mention a 3 a.m. rupture. The compilation of stories here first mentions the 17th Street Canal levee in a dispatch time-stamped 3:10 p.m. Other stories indicate that the levee breach occurred earlier -- exactly when remains unclear.
Perhaps the reader would help us out here with a clearer citation?
At least we can now lay to rest the belief that the levee broke 21 hours after the storm hit. That belief seems to have arisen from a misinterpretation of Michael Chertoff's clueless statements.
Nevertheless, the "blown levee" rumor continues to grow. Even if it proves fabulous, it may nevertheless have significance. The Whitewater pseudo-scandal was mostly a matter of rumor -- yet no-one can deny that the controversy was important.
In that light, you may want to read this piece -- which is written to a surprisingly high standard, considering the fact that it appears on the Alex Jones site. The article directs our attention to a blog by New Orleans resident Andrea Garland:
Also heard that part of the reason our house flooded is they dynamited part of the levee after the first section broke - they did this to prevent Uptown (the rich part of town) from being flooded. Apparently they used too much dynamite, thus flooding part of the Bywater. So now I know who is responsible for flooding my house - not Katrina, but our government.Not an eyewitness report, but at least now we have a name to deal with.
And Andrea is not the only named source. In the previous compilation, I foolishly overlooked this alleged eyewitness report which saw cyber-ink in the Daily Kos:
10:57 Raw transcript of comments by NOLA evacuee Clara Barthelemy: "The 17th street levee was bombed by the Army Corps of Engineers to save the more valuable real estate in the city... to keep the French Quarter protected, the ninth ward was sacrificed... people are afraid to speak out...We've seen these words earlier, except now we have a name. Does this name connect to an actual person? Is that person reliable? Can others confirm her story? Further digging may fetch some answers.
The Clara Barthelmy story has received responses elsewhere on the net, including this right-wing site. A reader opined that "Clara Barthelemy sounds fat, black, and uneducated." Another reader responded:
Dear Black People from NOLA:And people call me intolerant of Jesusmaniac red-staters. I don't apologize for responding to haters with counter-hate. Taste of their own medicine, and all that.
Obviously they blew the levee to protect the cars.
AND SINCE NONE OF YOU OWN CARS, YOU LOSE!@!!@#!@#
Omg operation "darkie shield", go innernets
Back to the blown levee story:
ABC's David Muir spoke to another New Orleans resident named Joe Edwards who claimed that the levee was intentionally blown:
JOE EDWARDS, JR., 9TH WARD RESIDENT: I heard something go BOOM!A potentially related account can be found in this London Observer article, which quotes a man named Correll Williams:
MUIR: Joe Edwards rushed to get himself and as many neighbors as possible into his truck. They drove to this bridge, where they've been living ever since
EDWARDS: My house broke in half. My mother's house just disintegrated. It was a brick house. All the houses down there floated down the street like somebody's guiding 'em
MUIR: Was it solely the water that broke the levee, or was it the force of this barge that now sits where homes once did? Joe Edwards says neither. People are so bitter, so disenfranchised in this neighborhood, they actually think the city did it, blowing up the levee to save richer neighborhoods like the French Quarter.
MUIR: So you're convinced . . .
EDWARDS: I know this happened!
MUIR: . . . they broke the levee on purpose?
EDWARDS: They blew it!
Williams only left his apartment after the authorities took the decision to flood his district in an apparent attempt to sluice out some of the water that had submerged a neighbouring district. Like hundreds of others he had heard the news of the decision to flood his district on the radio.Could this be the source of the "intentionally blown" reports?
We now have three (perhaps four) names. Those names do not necessarily make the story true -- but at least they take us out realm of anonymous reports. For that reason, I advise everyone to keep on eye on this tale, which may yet prove to be something more than just a tale.
A side note: Just to prove that right-wingers really do live in an alternate universe, this conservative conspiracy site claims that Clinton, not Bush, drastically underfunded the levees in New Orleans.
50 comments:
Hello there. Great work, but I must take issue with the following statement:
"Yes, levees do break. Especially levees facing a Level 4 hurricane. Especially when those levees were designed to withstand only a Level 3 hurricane."
Perhaps that is true, but it's irrelevant. A Level 4 hurricane did not hit New Orleans, and it wasn't levees that broke and flooded the city.
The hurricane's eastern, "buzz-saw" side was in Mississippi,its eye landed near the Louisiana-Mississippi border, and it was Mississippi that suffered the worst hurricane damage (see NYT).
The strongest winds New Orleans saw were 100mph, ie a weak category 2. This is why after the hurricane missed New Orleans and hit Mississippi, headlines said things like "New Orleans Spared, Stock Market Rallies" (Bloomberg)
You can see from the photos that New Orleans suffered very little damage from the actual hurricane.
Sometime after the 100-mph winds subsided, several concrete canals deep within the neighborhoods of NOLA developed large (40-foot) holes, somehow. These are NOT the infamous earthen levees holding back Lake Pontchartrain. They are, again, concrete canals that make their way through the center of town. Concrete structures do not rupture without the addition of considerable energy, and that is how we know that a windy evening was not the culprit.
By all means...:
I directed you to the TalkingPointsMemo site, and there is in fact such a link. [I actually had pointed it out to TPM earlier.] It is located in Monday, 8/29's entries, under "Late morning..." (the 13th entry for Monday, to-date). TPM has conflicting times sourced for the 17th St. Canal Flood Wall break, but the Knight-Ridder news article from 9/10 that is linked in that entry is an excellent piece of investigative journalism, and is the source of the 3 a.m. NG Timeline citation.
I heard that Cannon blew the levees.
He ate 400 cans of Baked Beans, then blew the fattest fucking fart ever heard in human memory, and they broke.
And Cannon is in another city.
I can't believe you've already found a source that blames Clinton, not Bush, for the cuts to disaster relief funding for New Orleans. Sigh. So sad.
The real issue isn't the credibility of Alex Jones. In fact, the issue doesn't have much to do with the credibility of ANY web site.
The important issue has to do with the credibility of the named witnesses. Who are they? What, exactly, did they see and hear?
And who paid them to make up such lies?
I wonder if the EPA or perhaps the CDC took water samples near or around the levees. Even though much pumping may have diluted any such samples, there would still be trace amounts of explosives in the water.
However..., a better question might be whether the results of any such water samples would ever see the light of day.
On August 24 of this year, The New York Times Book Review printed former Vice President Al Gore’s favorable review of Ross Gelbspan’s book “Boiling Point.” The book analyzes global warming and attacks the Bush administration for opposing the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol.
While I applaud Al Gore’s position on global warming, I don’t support ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. Apparently, I am in good company in opposing that Protocol as currently written, as I laid out in a letter to The Times Book Review that stated in part:
On July 25, 1997, John Kerry and Ted Kennedy, along with 93 other senators (with five senators not voting and none voting in opposition) adopted a resolution stating that ‘the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol to, or other agreement regarding, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992, at negotiations in Kyoto.’ Shouldn’t someone who has held the office of vice president of the United States and who has sought the presidency disclose the facts, even when reviewing a book? The reason that Gore’s name is not found with the 95 others is that as vice president presiding over the Senate, he could not cast a vote unless there was a tie. On the Kyoto vote the result was 95 to 0 against the treaty.
I agree that the best way to ward off global warming is to reduce the use of fossil fuels, primarily coal and oil, and their derivatives such as gasoline. This can be done by a number of means such as conservation, developing alternative energy sources and increasing combustion engine efficiency.
The Kyoto Protocol imposes limits on the expansion of fossil fuel use and requires cutbacks. The countries most affected by the limitations or cutbacks called for by Kyoto are the developed countries, primarily the United States, which uses 25 percent of the world’s gasoline, and to a lesser degree, Japan, Russia and the European Union.
In response to my letter criticizing Gore for urging support of Kyoto, Gore wrote to The Times as follows:
The ‘Sense of the Senate’ resolution that Ed Koch refers to actually took place five months before the Kyoto Protocol was even written, and was aimed at providing guidance to the negotiators on general principles. During the political give-and-take over its wording, that resolution was eventually stated so broadly that even the strongest supporters of a tough treaty ended up supporting it. Indeed, the author of the resolution, Senator Robert Byrd, has publicly criticized the subsequent misrepresentation of its meaning by opponents of Kyoto. The fact that the Protocol was not ratified by the Senate during the two years between its signing and the end of the last administration is evidence of the vigorous opposition by the Republican Congress to confronting the global climate crisis.
Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia wrote Resolution S. 98 that opposed ratification of Kyoto if it did not comply with certain concerns, the primary one being the exemption of developing nations like China and India from its requirements. The resolution was passed on July 25, 1997. The text of the Kyoto Protocol was ready for signature at the United Nations headquarters on March 16, 1998. The Protocol has not yet been ratified by Russia, whose signature is needed before it can become effective and binding on all signers.
As recently as October 30, 2003, Senator Byrd stated, “The Kyoto Protocol, in its current form, does not comply with the requirements of Senate Resolution 98.” He continued: “S. Res. 98 directed that any such treaty must include new scheduled commitments for the developing world in addition to any such requirements for industrialized nations but requirements would be binding and mandatory and lead to real reductions in the emissions of greenhouse gases over time. This is clearly different than the minimal, vague, and voluntary commitments that we are currently pursuing.”
This was a reference to the Bush Administration. Byrd also emphasized that “developing nations, especially the largest emitters, need to be a part of any binding global climate change treaty.”
President Clinton and Al Gore were unsuccessful in getting the signers of Kyoto to include the developing nations. Knowing that the Kyoto Protocol would not be passed without the inclusion of developing countries in some way, Clinton did not even send the Protocol to the U.S. Senate for ratification.
Gore now blames Bush for not getting the parties of the Protocol to include developing countries under its mandates. This is an outcome which neither he nor Clinton had been able to accomplish during their eight years of office from 1993 to 2001. How could Bush be expected to succeed where they had failed?
China has since surpassed Japan in its use and importation of the world’s major energy source, oil, ranking second in use after the U.S. China is now one of the largest manufacturers of automobiles, with millions of new buyers joining those already in line to buy its Cadillac and Volkswagens and many other foreign brands licensed for manufacture in China. The aggregate population of China and India is in excess of 2 billion people.
Should we sign the Kyoto Protocol in its current form, as Al Gore appears to be urging, if those nations which have signed it decline to renegotiate the Protocol and include the developing nations? I don’t think so, and I don’t think you will find a single U.S. senator who urges that we do so under these conditions.
Senator John Kerry should be asked if he as president would submit the flawed Protocol to the Senate for ratification and if he were still senator would he vote for it.
Disastrous politics
Mark Alexander (archive)
September 23, 2005 | Print | Recommend to a friend
As residents in coastal Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama continue to piece their lives back together, there are two persistent questions about Hurricane Katrina at the forefront of acrimonious political debate this week.
First, there is the lingering question of who is responsible for the lack of planning, preparation and infrastructural improvement in the days, weeks, months and years leading up to the hurricane. This all-important question, however, has spawned a concerted effort to focus on the sluggish federal response as a diversion. (As a resource for this question, see the Katrina Consequential Timeline)
Clearly there were bureaucratic failures by FEMA -- but that is the nature of the beast, and no amount of reform, other than decentralization, will change that. The most productive thing President George Bush can do to alleviate the bureaucratic abysses is to eliminate it. As noted in this column last week, "As a first measure, the President should fire every senior executive service lawyer in DHS, FEMA, DoD, et al. The entire federal bureaucracy is hamstrung by legalities."
As for the question of accountability in New Orleans, by now, everyone on the planet knows that most of New Orleans, with the exception of the original city settlement, has been developed below sea level -- surrounded by expanding levees intended to protect it from Lake Pontchartrain, the Mississippi River and the Gulf. Those levees, designed to withstand a category three hurricane, were never upgraded to withstand a category four or five hurricane, though clearly such a storm was inevitable.
On a good day, New Orleans continuously pumps water out of the alluvial bowl created by its levees, though building structures there continue to sink. In the event of a category four or five hurricane, however, 80 percent of the city would be swamped, and every politician from the city's mayor to the state's governor knew it. But the Big Easy is a party town -- a gambling destination -- and the city's leadership wagered the city against odds of a big hurricane.
In the years prior to Hurricane Katrina, there were numerous factors that precluded the strengthening of New Orleans' levees. The primary burden for inaction lies with generations of corrupt Louisiana politicians, from the Huey Long dynasty forward. Despite the city's continued below-sea-level expansion, these crooked and negligent pols paid little regard to levee strength, even in the face of repeated warnings about their inadequacy. There were also successful legal challenges brought by environmental groups who blocked the expansion and hardening of levees in an effort to protect the neighboring wetlands. Indeed, New Orleans' hurricane-defense system -- such as it was -- would have been greatly improved by the Army Corps of Engineers had it not been for environmental lobby lawsuits in both 1977 and 1996.
In recent years, Louisiana has received more federal taxpayer-funded Corps of Engineer grants than any other state and has received more levee funding under the Bush administration than it did under the Clinton administration. However, that funding has been limited by massive boondoggle infrastructure projects like the 700-percent cost overrun for Ted Kennedy's Big Dig -- $16 billion American tax payers spent on 7.5 miles of Boston highway that could have been spent on NOLA levees, but we digress.
The funding New Orleans did receive was often diverted by the city's Levee Board to other projects. For example, the Board spent $2.4 million of levee funding on a Mardi Gras fountain near Lake Pontchartrain, and $15 million more on overpasses to riverboat casinos. All the while, a big storm was on the horizon.
On Monday, 29 August, after a few days of evacuation flip-flops, tens of thousands of New Orleans residents emerged midday to the realization that Katrina's worst winds had landed to the east. Although Katrina was now tearing into Mississippi and Alabama, New Orleans had -- or so it thought -- dodged the bullet.
As waters continued to rise against levees holding back Lake Pontchartrain, there was some concern that Katrina's massive rainfall might yet overtop the levees. However, it appears now that the levees were not overtopped. In fact, there is compelling evidence that the floodwalls failed structurally in two locations -- which would not have happened if they had been built to specifications. (Contrary to assertions by Nation of Islam agitator Louis Farrakhan, the levees were not "blown up" in order to divert flood waters from "white" to "black" parts of the city.)
Simply put, somewhere there is a contractor, and a whole cadre of well-grafted inspectors, who are accountable for the structural failure of the levees. Finding that contractor will be one of many serious tasks facing congressional investigators in the coming months.
As you recall, in the immediate aftermath of the levee failure, Democrats were waving accusatory fingers and demanding an "inquisition commission." They were hoping for colorful headlines blaming the Bush administration and, by extension, anyone on a Republican ticket in the upcoming election year. Then, when Republicans joined in the call for investigations, Democrats quickly backed down and, indeed, refused to take part altogether. Upon reflection, they determined that an inquiry into factual communication, material distribution and evacuation failures after Katrina would instead bury Louisiana Democrats -- from buck-passing New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin (see his evacuation plan) to lachrymose Governor Kathleen Blanco to hysterical Senator Mary Landrieu.
Truth be told, congressional investigators need only do one thing to get to the bottom of the floodwaters in New Orleans -- follow the money.
Rep. Tom Davis, chairman of the Select Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, said this week that his investigation will "move ahead" with or without Democrats. Rep. Davis, who also chairs the chamber's Government Reform Committee, said, "At the end of the day, we must come together for good, hard fact-finding." But, he noted, Democrats "could tie up the process forever, and losing time is losing information." (Of course, the Demos will obstruct the investigation, claiming it is a Republican cover-up.)
Perhaps the committee's first witness should be Bill Nungesser, a former Levee Board chairman who tried to reform the system. Mr. Nungesser says of the levee failure, "Every time I turned over a rock, there was something rotten. I used to tell people, 'If your children ever die in a hurricane, come shoot us, because we're responsible.' We throw away all sorts of money." (In other words, Louisiana Democrats had looted New Orleans long before Katrina hit.)
Rotten indeed, which leads us to the second pressing question about Hurricane Katrina this week: Who's going to pay for what -- and how?
President Bush has proposed a massive reconstruction effort that will ultimately cost perhaps $200 billion both in hard-dollar reconstruction costs and soft-dollar tax incentives, enterprise zones and the like. The President also called for modest cuts in other government programs to offset the reconstruction costs, anticipating that congressional Republicans would follow suit with more aggressive proposals for cutting other department budgets.
On that note, House Republican Study Committee chairman Rep. Mike Pence announced "Operation Offset" Wednesday, a proposal to cut $500 billion over the next decade. "We must begin now, as the American people expect particularly Republican majorities in Washington to do, to make the hard choices," said Pence, who anteed up $16 million earmarked in the just-passed highway bill for his district's roads and infrastructure. Pence was quick to add that cutting all the pork out of the massive $284-billion highway bill (about $120 billion) would offset only about half the Gulf Coast reconstruction costs, and that there would have to be substantial cuts across the board in other bloated programs.
In a remarkable move, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was quick to comply, announcing that she would return $70 million of the $129 million in highway-bill earmarks that she'd grabbed for her district.
Speaker Dennis Hastert warned, "We all know that we have a fiscal responsibility throughout this process. We want to make sure that taxpayer dollars are being used for their intended purposes and not being misspent."
Rep. Tom Tancredo added his concern about how reconstruction funds will be used: "The head of the FBI in New Orleans just this past year described the state's public corruption as 'epidemic, endemic, and entrenched. No branch of government is exempt.' The question is not whether Congress should provide for those in need, but whether state and local officials who have been derelict in their duty should be trusted with that money."
Undoubtedly, the potential for fraud is as massive as the reconstruction effort, and some of this "cost offsetting" is tantamount to dumping unconstitutional pork from one plate to another.
Amid all of this rancorous debate about who's to blame and who will foot the bill, the plight of those on the Gulf Coast who actually lost family members, homes and businesses somehow gets lost. Those at ground level are not worrying about political agendas. They're busy trying to provide for their families. Or perhaps they're searching through the rubble, trying to find fragments of family heirlooms and photographs. It is for them that we continue to pray every day.
Thanks for the info, I added you to my favorites.
If you are interested in business home internet marketing mlm
, I have a business home internet marketing mlm
site.
Feel free to drop by and tell me what you think.
Hey, you have a great blog here!
Just checking different blogs and posting to the ones I like.
If my post is not for you then sorry about this.
I have a online sports gambling site. It pretty much covers ##GAMBLING## related stuff.
Come and check it out
.
I just bookmarked your blog. I will try to post often.
Do you think gas pricing is ever going to go down? I founds some gas saving tips at home depot coupon
Keep in touch :)
You are truly blessed to be a blessing!
I just picked up another internet marketing add link technique to use from the posted on your blog. I can wait to get more internet marketing add link techniques.
You are truly a blessing in more ways than you can imagine.
Well written blog on site turnkey web I have a related blog on site turnkey web
Great site about web site design houston texas Keep up the good work! website design bathurst
Greetings!
I am researching christian denomination
in order to spread the word about a great new
book.
I'm quite sure that many of the readers
of this blog are interested to read about
christian denomination
Good Posts, Keep on Blogging.
Be sure to visit
Advanced Business Marketing
Expensive Marketing Secrets Free.
ciao bello che stai facendo di bello
Good Posts, Keep on Blogging.
Be sure to visit
Advanced Business Marketing
Expensive Marketing Secrets Free.
Hey Blogger, just looking info on call center and stumbled onto your blog. Actually The rumor: Follow up was not exactly what I was searching for, it caught my eye and grabbed my attention. I understand now how I landed on your site when I typed in call center related info, and I'm glad I found your page. Nice post and I'll check back for more wisdom. : )
I discuss this topic daily myself. I also have a website that talks about california cash equity goldmedalmortgage.com home loan refinance related things. Go check it out if you get a chance.
Hey you have a great blog here about mlm chat rooms. I'm definately going to bookmark you.mlm chat rooms. Come check it out when you have time.
Hi Blogger, I find it very refreshing to occasionally find a article such as yours with a familiar topic such as The rumor: Follow up. It somehow ads to ones list of lifes experiences.
I have a soft spot for blogs related to creating ebooks and /or sites that have a central theme around creating ebooks type items.
Once again, thank you Blogger, hope to see more posts from you in the future :-)
I just ran across "The rumor: Follow up" while conducting some research on various Detective sites. Even though it wasn't really what I was searching for, I think the people who visit your site might still be interested in reading our reviews of various sites including Detective. I started creating these review sites to help people determine what's good and what's bad on the net. As you know, the more information people have before spending their hard earned money, the better. Your readers can even add their opinions for others to read. By the way, I enjoyed reading the posts on your site.
I found your blog on [turnkey home business] and thought it might be of interest to my readers at my[turnkey home business] blog. Check it out if you have time.
Get 1000s of Links pointing back to Your Site... Starting Today!
YO Blogger !!
This blog called The rumor: Follow up is one I just came across while looking over the net the last while. Do you have any business free home resell right risk ? I almost typed Grey Poupon. haha. My BAD spelling!! LOL - (:--). If you've ever come across business free home resell right risk I was curious if you did anything with it?
I've got a FREAKING pile! & been trying to sell em online. What a uphill learning curve!
How long you been blogging?
Keep up the (:0) work !
Chad again.
Hi Blogger,
I always like an interesting blog. The rumor: Follow up caught my attention even if I was looking for best autosurf blogs. Kind of gets my thoughts moving coming from a different angle about best autosurf. Hope to check back every now and then. Have a nice day :-)
Hey Blogger, just looking info on call center and stumbled onto your blog. Actually The rumor: Follow up was not exactly what I was searching for, it caught my eye and grabbed my attention. I understand now how I landed on your site when I typed in call center related info, and I'm glad I found your page. Nice post and I'll check back for more wisdom. : )
Mighty Blogalicious, blog posting to you Blogger !
I'm always looking for more master resell rights . Watch out for my BAD grammar! (:--)
Do you have any master resell rights on your The rumor: Follow up blog?
Curious to how you've been using your's if you have any - ever sold any?
Here's what I did with mine: http://www.TonOFeBooks.com .
Have a kick butt day and don't let the bad bloggers get you down !
Informative blog you have here. Here is mine tv shopping
Hi,
The rumor: Follow up was interesting. Someone told me about blogs and I have been out there looking all nite. I'm glad I got the chance to check it out. I will be back. Well on with my search. Have a nice day :-)
And A Link Back To Your Web Site Excite You?
Hi, It was about time that someone tought about roulette lyric system. It has been a long time waiting for roulette lyric system. Hope you can profit from this as much as I did. Larry
Hey Blogger, just looking info on coastal vacations and stumbled onto your blog. Actually this post was not exactly what I was searching for, it caught my eye and grabbed my attention. I understand now how I landed on your site when I typed in coastal vacations related info, and I'm glad I found your page. Nice post and I'll check back for more wisdom. : )
Mighty Blogalicious, blog posting to you Blogger !
I'm always looking for more ebook author ebook resell right . Watch out for my BAD grammar! (:--)
Do you have any ebook author ebook resell right on your The rumor: Follow up blog?
Curious to how you've been using your's if you have any - ever sold any?
Here's what I did with mine: http://www.TonOFeBooks.com .
Have a kick butt day and don't let the bad bloggers get you down !
We've been running traffic generating operations for our 400+ websites
Howdy Blogger, I was just net surfing for some info on liberty league and noticed your blog site. Your The rumor: Follow up sounded interesting although not relevant to my liberty league search but I am glad see someone has some excellent points of view out there.
I have thoroughly enjoyed reading through your blog. Thanks for the great information. I will visit on a regular basis. I hope other reader will appreciate your content as well...
I have a internet marketing secret site. It pretty much covers internet marketing secret related items and services. You may find some of my content of interest.
Come by and visit my site.
The title read... The rumor: Follow up and Blogger I gotta tell ya... Nothing I've ever found beats coastal vacations britt phillips in terms of both easy to do and easy to make serious money. I mean the system these guys have built is so simple a child could make not just a little money, but I'm talking thousands of dollars every week. What does everyone here think about coastal vacations britt phillips ?
If you would just take your time to know your way around, you could discover
Nice Site. We have Free Houses on my site. Please take a look new home construction in bixby
Hi,
I've got an online slot machines strategy site with some original articles related to slot playing strategy that your visitors may find interesting - here's a sample article:
Multi-Player Slots - Why They Look Set for Huge Growth!
Slots are exciting and fun, but are a solitary playing experience. Many of us like to play with other players and this is where multi-player slots can enhance your ...
slot playing strategy
Thanks,
I enjoyed your coupon code blog. I found this coupon forum that you might be interested in... **Coupon Forum**
Hi, Blogger, I liked your blog its my first time here! If you are interested, go see my telemarketing software related site. Its purley for Businesses who need telemarketing.http://www.lowcosttraffic.com/mlm-telerecruiter.html
All the best to you!
Hi there Blogger I am out looking for the freshest information on ellis island genealogy and encountered your site. Although The rumor: Follow up wasn't just what I was searching for, it certaninly got my attention and intrest. I see now why I found your page when I was looking for ellis island genealogy related information, and I'm glad I stopped by even though this isn't a right match.
Awesome post, Thanks for the read!
GROW IT YOURSELF!
Hello there, I was recently doing a search through blogs for the phrase at home work. I happened to come across yours even though it wasn't particularly related to what I searched for. I still decided to read your blog a bit, and I just wanted to say that you have a good thing going here. Anyway, I've only just recently started a at home work website, and I'm searching blogs trying to find ideas. Feel free to visit the site when you get a chance if you wish. Much success, Eric.
display your RSS feeds on their web sites for content.
Yes, you can stay home with our quick money making idea and get paid from the automatic Internet sale of OVER ONE MILLION valuable items!
Post a Comment